close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Talk

Why should YOU join our Glock forum?

  • Converse with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Learn about the latest hunting products
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.

Glipsc 10-8-09

Discussion in 'Bluegrass Glockers' started by TreehugginGlock, Oct 8, 2009.

  1. Well, I guess I need to post the results from tonight or else someone will be accusing me of trying to hide my lousy showing. Oh well, I had a learning experience tonight and hopefully once I burn through the ammo I already have loaded, I'll be cooking with gas again.

    Well, tonight we had an amazing turn out of folks. We had 4 targets with a no shoot and some hard cover areas. Shot 2 rounds into each target for three different positions with mag changes in between.

    Here's how things shaped up:

    4.870 Dean Francisco
    4.859 John Haas
    4.076 Jeff Cooke
    3.982 Greg Hodges (not too bad shooting my ammo)
    3.578 Jim Geiger
    3.405 Richard Wanke
    3.322 Steve Dunham
    3.328 Danny Massey
    2.658 Gary Lee
    2.384 Chris Nelson
    1.977 Tom Spivey
    1.928 Herman Stuckey
    1.9073 Otis Fox
    1.9070 Jonathan Brand
    1.902 Richards Marks
    1.623 Leigh Ann Jeter
    0.709 Mike Fuzette

    Hope everyone had fun. I love it when we shoot on the move, so I had a great time even though I stank up the place. Oh well, there's always next week. See you all there.:wavey:
     
  2. roadforeman

    roadforeman NRA Benefactor

    93
    0
    Feb 24, 2009
    Western KY
    From one pole cat to another, you didn't stink up the place. Your ammo may have..................................................:tongueout:
     


  3. Yes Leigh Ann Learned that if you do not seat your primers all the way it may not go boom, Greg learned not to borrow ammo from Leigh Ann. Oh yes Wonks gun worked last night too.
     
  4. wenmass3

    wenmass3

    7
    0
    Jul 18, 2009
    Hey ,
    3.328 is better than 3.322 :) I think you may have typed in the worng number :- )

    Best regards ,
    Danny
     
  5. wenmass3

    wenmass3

    7
    0
    Jul 18, 2009
    Hey,
    3.328 is a higher number than 3.322

    Well , you have to be petty when you don't shoot that good ! Besides , Steve always beats me anyway !

    Thanks ,
    Danny
     
    Last edited: Oct 10, 2009
  6. You're right, Danny. That's what I get for relying on what a man tells me without double checking it. :brickwall:

    You were actually number 7 and Steve was number 8.

    Good catch.
     
  7. Wonk

    Wonk

    19
    0
    Feb 1, 2009
    10,000 pardons Danny. Being the OCD type you would think I could do better than that but numbers never where my best subject. :embarassed:
     
  8. wenmass3

    wenmass3

    7
    0
    Jul 18, 2009
    Thanks Leigh Ann and Wonk

    No problem - I should get moved to last for whining !