Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.
Separate names with a comma.
If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.
Discussion in 'General Glocking' started by tercel89, Jan 16, 2013.
Will a regular (gen 3 ) recoil spring assembly work in a Gen 4 G19 , 17,22,23 ?
No, the hole in the front of a gen4 slide is too large and a gen3 RSA will pass through it.
Yes you can. You will need a washer adapter for the front of the slide. These can be found on ebay or elsewhere. Yes and it does change ejection behavior.
Here's one such adapter washer that will allow you to use a Gen3 recoil assembly in a Gen4:
Many manufacturers make their own such adapter washers.
I found this idea rather interesting though, an aftermarket guide rod with a single recoil spring made to fit a Gen4:
I wasn't aware of this. I would however think twice about doing this. The newer, post July 2011 RSA's work fine as intended.
It seams to me these aftermarket adaptations were a result of companies jumping on the gen4 RSA issue bandwagon and trying to make a quick buck before Glock fixed the issue.
Today, I don't see the need.
The NEED is if you intend to "tune" your RSA's with different spring weights, or if you are experiencing BTF issues, or if you want to shoot 115 gr. like the Gen3's do.
AND/OR go to a single solid metal rod system (titanium, tungsten, stainless)
Aftermarket springs are much better quality springs than the flat Glock springs, and they are cheap once you have invested in the rod.
There is no advantage of the Gen4 TRIPLE spring RSA over a traditional single spring/rod setup-- single rod and spring makes it simpler, less prone to fail.
There are a few posts where the double system has binded or locked up.
Thanks for the explanation.
No advantage at all ? not one ? can you provide some data to back that up ?
My Gen 4 G22 has a softer recoil than my Gen 3 did. I consider it an advantage.
NO, can you provide data the other direction, other than anecdotes of perceived recoil reduction, and cool factor. A single spring recoil assembly works just as well as the double, there are no advantages that I can conceive in a handgun, just downsides as mentioned in the post.
"Perceived" recoil is not eligible. Don't get me wrong- I do own gen 4 guns, as well as G26, G30, and G29, I know what the recoil feels like compared to my single spring guns-- but I don't perceive the TRIPLE recoil spring giving any advantage...more points for disadvantage than advantage.
That is very interesting. I would not have thought, there would be any difference assuming the springs are the same strength.
CCI, the reduced recoil is not perceived. At least in my two examples. It's noticeable.
The Gen4 Glock 19 spring is not the same "strength" as the Gen3 Glock 19 single spring. Because it is also a TRIPLE spring assembly (3 springs), the physics are slightly different also - as discovered by the initial problems with the G4 Glock 19.
It is quite the complex spring assembly. but sometimes simple is better .
Again with a washer adapter, and a aftermarket rod, one has the ability to vary the spring characteristics IF one were having ejection issues.
Sorry, I don't notice a recoil difference between my Gen4 and my Gen3 (stock springs) guns. How are you sure its not the grip feel affecting your perception?
I'm guessing that Glock is using the dual spring assembly because it allows a wider range of effect whereas it is the best of both worlds: on the one hand it can handle heavier loads than a single spring while at the same time being able to handle softer loads since two springs don't have to be the same rate. Like I said just a guess but seems credible in terms of physics.
BTY I am using an adapted SS rod and single spring assembly from the Glockstore. So far no negative effects but I have only ran a box of FMJ through the gun. I went this route because I intend to use 45 Super in the gun occasionally, and also replaced the barrel with a LW threaded barrel.
That's why I played it safe by saying my examples of the Gen3 and 4 G22. Maybe not all. And not speaking of the 9mm. Just .40
As far as how I know, you'll just have to take my word for it. Been shooting the gen3 for ten years or so and shot the gen4 today back to back.
It's physics, a very simplified view is, the harder that slide slams back, the more felt recoil. Just pull back both slides and see which one requires more force. Both being new springs.
But, the other side of the coin is, the heavier spring needs a more stout grip to function and can make an ammo sensitive gun.
I assume that you can provide data that a single spring works just as well as a double.
I have no doubt that it made a difference in the G22. Many forum members reported the same.
It is not anecdotal when you loose the snappiness inherent in the G22 Gen 3.
It is counterintuitive: if you read most tutorials on recoil spring, stronger springs give MORE shooter perceived recoil. It is a common mistake that shooters to go to a 'heavier" spring when shooting heavier loads for the purpose of "reducing" recoil. You only go to a heavier spring to preserve the gun mechanicals-- on a Glock this is irrelevant, on a tuned 1911, that might make more sense.
Spring considerations do not occur in a vacuum- but must take into consideration the ammo load. The LIGHTER the spring the WIDER the ammo variation tolerance (ie less probability of ammo cycling failure). The lighter the spring, the farther the brass flies. (Makes it harder for handloaders to find - thus they may want to go to a heavier spring to tune where their ejected brass lands).
The heavier the spring, the more important the ammo load factors into the cycling (ie narrower ammo variation tolerance, the higher the probability of ammo cycling failure). The heavier the spring the shorter the ejection trajectory. Too strong and the brass just barely rolls out or hits you in the face--- worse case gun fails to cycle. This is evident in Glock's recent foray into the multi spring "improvement".
Here is a simple article: http://www.custom-glock.com/springtech.html You can google more if you want more.
The subject on recoil is quite complex. Psychology has as much to do with it as physics. We are conditioned to move our hands arms and shoulders even when the gun does not even go off-- this contributes to the recoil-- this is seen in simple FTF drills (load a dummy round somewhere in a magazine). We are conditioned by hollywood and ourselves. If you shoot 1000 rounds of .40SW in a weekend course- the recoil at the beginning of the weekend is very stout compared to the end of the weekend-- where you don't notice the gun going off.
Changing the grip texture or grip size makes a large difference in perceived recoil. This is where Glock should have stopped.
Back to the subject: Yes you can run a Gen 3 RSA in a Gen4, with an adapter device (machined washer).
If you are one of those with a chronic BTF or 115gr failure to cycle Gen4 problem, this is the first thing I would do. That's just my opinion.