close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Gen 4 G22 recoil

Discussion in 'Caliber Corner' started by thomas.allen12, Oct 8, 2012.


Tags:
  1. thomas.allen12

    thomas.allen12
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2012
    13
    0
    Location:
    Clarksville, TN at present
    I just bought a Gen 4 G22 .40 S&W and the recoil is crazy. Everything I have read said that was suppose to be a little bit more than the 9mm recoil. Was wondering if I should get new recoil springs. You'd think with the new version of spring that is in a Gen 4 there wouldn't be that much recoil.
     

    Wanna kill these ads? We can help!
  2. TheExplorer

    TheExplorer
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2012
    1,322
    0
    What ammo? And if you think that's bad on a 22, try a 27.
     

  3. thomas.allen12

    thomas.allen12
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2012
    13
    0
    Location:
    Clarksville, TN at present
    Just standard Federal FMJ...

     
  4. TheExplorer

    TheExplorer
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2012
    1,322
    0
    Grain?
     
  5. avenues165

    avenues165
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2012
    428
    0
    Location:
    SLC, Utah
    It sucks that you are experiencing something you didn't expect. Recoil is relative. I have found my G23 to be a softer shooter than other .40s I have shot. I would have predicted that a Gen 4 G22 is a softer shooter than a G23.

    I would say either trade it for a G17, or buy a .40-9mm barrel for it. I see no benefit to using a pistol that is unpleasant to shoot.

    If you haven't already, try 180 grain loads. There are also some 135 grain loadings that are labeled low recoil. Federal make one, IIRC. For the range I have used a Fiocchi 165 grain loading at 1,040fps that is pretty mild. I also have found the Federal HST 165 grain loading to shoot fairly mild for a SD load.
     
  6. cowboy1964

    cowboy1964
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2009
    19,445
    1,992
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    Glock .40s kick fairly hard compared to others like M&P and HKs. It is what it is. You will get used to it. 180 grainers should kick the least.

    I just ordered some low recoiling Winchester Ranger 135gr just to get an idea of what that's like, though I probably would never use it for a carry round.
     
    #6 cowboy1964, Oct 8, 2012
    Last edited: Oct 8, 2012
  7. vafish

    vafish
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2003
    16,541
    29
    Location:
    Commonwealth of Virginia
    I can hardly tell the difference between 9mm +p+ in my g17 or g19 and 180 gr loads in my g23 or my sons g22.

    But I've been shooting .41 mag, .44 mag, and heavy handloads in .45 colt for 30 years.

    Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine
     
  8. Para_bellum17

    Para_bellum17
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2012
    15
    0
    If the weapon is new then you'll need to take a break-in period into consideration. Before you say that you don't like, it fire a few hundred rounds and see what you think. Used is used, you're not going to recoup all of your money if you get rid of it now. I have a G23 and found that the 180gr have the least felt ercoil/snap.
     
  9. JW1178

    JW1178
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2009
    2,254
    76
    How about a picking up a pair of Man-Up pills? :supergrin:

    No really, couldn't resist. I know it snaps a bit more, but train with it and it won't be much of an issue. Or, take it down two model numbers and get the gun that really has a pair, the G20. It actually flips less, but will put it back more.
     
  10. SCmasterblaster

    SCmasterblaster
    Expand Collapse
    Millennium Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 1999
    17,801
    552
    Location:
    Hartford, Vermont
    How's your grip strength?
     
  11. thomas.allen12

    thomas.allen12
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2012
    13
    0
    Location:
    Clarksville, TN at present
    180 gr...My grip strength is good... I'm not new to this. I have been in the Army now long enough to retire. I've shot my fair share and then some. I don't mind the recoil just wondered it is was normal as I haven't shot a .40 S&W before. Mainly 9mm since that is what I carry when deployed. I want to get to where I can double tap and actually hit the target on the second shot like I do with my old Baretta M9. Thanks for all the replys. As far as the "Man up" pills....I prefer "Soldier Up"....LOL~~!!
     
  12. SCmasterblaster

    SCmasterblaster
    Expand Collapse
    Millennium Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 1999
    17,801
    552
    Location:
    Hartford, Vermont
    a G17. Far less recoil in a 9x19. :cool:
     
  13. SDGlock23

    SDGlock23
    Expand Collapse
    Glockoholic

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2005
    6,489
    134
    Location:
    Under the dome on the flat earth
    Going from a heavy, steel 9mm to a lightweight .40 I guess would be somewhat of a change. I do think the Gen4's recoil less than the Gen3's, but recoil is a subjective thing.
     
  14. SCmasterblaster

    SCmasterblaster
    Expand Collapse
    Millennium Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 1999
    17,801
    552
    Location:
    Hartford, Vermont
    I work out with the grip-strengthening tool. :supergrin:
     
  15. avenues165

    avenues165
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2012
    428
    0
    Location:
    SLC, Utah
    If you find that you just don't care for the .40, you can try 357 sig. I really like to shoot the 357 and it seems to have less perceived recoil for me. The recoil characteristics are also different, it has less muzzle flip and twist. It seems to come straight back at you, allowing for faster follow-ups, in my experience.

    You can convert the G22 to 357 sig with only a barrel change, the .40 mags work fine as is. The G22 and the G31 use the same parts other than the barrel and mag followers.

    Some feel that if they are going to use a 9mm bullet that the 9mm is fine. I get that, but I personally love the 357 sig.
     
  16. Tiro Fijo

    Tiro Fijo
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    May 31, 2011
    6,281
    7

    So, you're a bachelor?


    :rofl: :tongueout:
     
    #16 Tiro Fijo, Oct 10, 2012
    Last edited: Oct 10, 2012
  17. SCmasterblaster

    SCmasterblaster
    Expand Collapse
    Millennium Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 1999
    17,801
    552
    Location:
    Hartford, Vermont
    Yes, I happen to be a 57-year-old batchelor. :upeyes:
     
  18. ADK_40GLKr

    ADK_40GLKr
    Expand Collapse
    1. Christian Studies

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2010
    2,334
    7
    Location:
    RFD NY Adks
    ^^^^^^
    This
    I started on a Gen 2 G22, so didn't know the difference until I got a 9mm conversion barrel. The only time .40 bothers me is when I shoot my G27 right after firing a few magazines of .22LR.

    May I suggest: SHOOT the thing until you get used to it!

    As someone already suggested, It;'s all relative!
     
  19. vafish

    vafish
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2003
    16,541
    29
    Location:
    Commonwealth of Virginia
    He can convert it to 9mm with just a barrel and a magazine.

    Needs to be a conversion barrel.

    Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine
     
  20. packinaglock

    packinaglock
    Expand Collapse
    John 3:16
    1. Glock Talk's Drunk Squad

    Joined:
    May 1, 2007
    5,691
    550
    Location:
    Loxahatchee Fl
    So do I when my wife prescribes me a dose of Noassatall. :supergrin: