close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

FMJ for Self Defense?

Discussion in 'Caliber Corner' started by Glock19Fan, Aug 6, 2012.

  1. Inebriated

    Inebriated

    2,449
    57
    Feb 20, 2012
    If you don't hit a vital organ or structure, you will not stop a fight. Simple as that. I don't care if it's with a .45 ACP that expanded to 3 FEET, if you miss vitals, you aren't winning. Handguns (9mm, .40, .45) don't do a thing but poke holes, JHP or not, and a .357" hole in the Aorta is just as effective as a .45" hole. I would prefer to use something designed to penetrate, and get to what it needs to put a hole in, than use something designed to STOP MOVING inside the body. So if I didn't have to worry about every round going passing through a bad guy, and potentially wounding someone innocent, I would carry FMJ and be just as content, if not more.
     
    Last edited: Oct 24, 2012
  2. RichardB

    RichardB Silver Member

    1,742
    128
    Jul 29, 2007
    NC
    I don't know that the big hole, small hole theory has much to do with reality.

    Marshal & Sanow developed data which depicts 9mm FMJ and 45ACP FMJ as roughly comparable in stopping power (I don't sweat the small % of difference). Their numbers shattered the balloons of others and the war was on.

    Decades later another cop, Greg Ellifritz, has published his own numbers, using different criteria and he also finds the 45 and 9mm Parabellum are not that far apart. Ellifritz's bottom line is: For serious fighting use a rifle or shotgun.

    http://www.buckeyefirearms.org/printable/node/7866

    Excerpts of Ellifritz's paper.

    9mm Luger
    # of people shot - 456
    # of hits - 1121
    % of hits that were fatal - 24%
    Average number of rounds until incapacitation - 2.45
    % of people who were not incapacitated - 13%
    One-shot-stop % - 34%
    Accuracy (head and torso hits) - 74%
    % actually incapacitated by one shot (torso or head hit) - 47%

    45 ACP
    # of people shot - 209
    # of hits - 436
    % of hits that were fatal - 29%
    Average number of rounds until incapacitation - 2.08
    % of people who were not incapacitated - 14%
    One-shot-stop % - 39%
    Accuracy (head and torso hits) - 85%
    % actually incapacitated by one shot (torso or head hit) - 51%

    Based on this study one should be prepared to need more than one round to neutralize a serious threat.
     

  3. digilo

    digilo

    307
    0
    Apr 27, 2010
    texas
    Use FMJ only if that's all your gun will feed. Otherwise use of HP is prudent. Gabrielle Gifford was shot in the head with a 9mm FMJ, and shes recovering.

    Can't get much better shot placement than that.

    Had the bullet been HP instead of FMJ, no way she'd have recovered.

    Also, anyone care to speculate on her chances had she been shot in the head with .45 ACP FMJ, instead of 9mm FMJ??
     
  4. M 7

    M 7

    1,399
    34
    May 22, 2012
    I am not sure that any valid conclusion(s) can be drawn from the Marshall and Sanow data due to the fact that the data appears to have been intentionally manipulated.

    http://www.firearmstactical.com/marshall-sanow-statistical-analysis.htm

    The statistical analysis (in the link above) is pretty damning unless one is willing to believe that a one in three trillion chance is a good bet. :winkie:

    While the study done by Ellifritz seems to be seriously flawed, it appears for the time being, that his data was not manipulated. It would've been nice to see a more detailed break-down of his data like the brand, type (JHP or FMJ) and weight of the ammo involved, separate categories for "head" and "torso" shots, etc.

    Some of his conclusions are a little goofy, but to his credit he seems to have offered an honest attempt at analyzing the data he collected.
     
    Last edited: Oct 24, 2012
  5. Tiro Fijo

    Tiro Fijo

    6,281
    8
    May 31, 2011

    That is pure hyperbole & conjecture based upon opinions of those whose theory the data didn't support, i.e., the Facklerites. Those who were in the know during that time confirmed what was revealed in the data: that the .357 Mag. & the 9mm 115 gr. +p+ JHP were deadly. Ask anyone who was on the Border Patrol in the 80's or the IL State Police as well.
     
  6. M 7

    M 7

    1,399
    34
    May 22, 2012
    Lighten up, dude. :winkie:

    If you'll take the time to read the linked material you'll see that there is no hyperbole or conjecture-

    http://www.firearmstactical.com/marshall-sanow-statistical-analysis.htm

    the statistical analysis is well done and the results are clearly documented for all to see, or at least, for those who will see.

    Just 'cause you don't like it doesn't mean that it is not a valid analysis. The M&S stuff has HUGE issues, unless of course a 1 chance in 3 trillion plus of being legitimate is a good thing. :dunno:

    See, I got no skin in the game, so I don't care. "Light & fast", "slow & heavy", or somewhere "in between"- it's all good.
     
    Last edited: Oct 24, 2012
  7. FMJ .45 ACP, like 9mm FMJ, has a long track record against human adversaries. While I haven't heard much about 9mm FMJ, .45 FMJ has a very good track record, so much so that some people prefer them to JHC as the FMJs are probably the best feeding .45s extant.
     
  8. Tiro Fijo

    Tiro Fijo

    6,281
    8
    May 31, 2011
    Perhaps you just "discovered" this revolutionary info you keep quoting, however this has been beat to death a million times here & on other websites. ANCIENT NEWS!!

    Marshall never "doctored" his stats. It's just that his stats didn't jive with what the FBI was pushing at the time.
     
  9. Glock19Fan

    Glock19Fan Cool Guy

    1,729
    7
    Mar 25, 2003
    Tennessee
    From what I recall, the same surgeon that operated on her also saved the life of a patient shot in the head with a 7.62x39 AK round.
     
  10. shotgunred

    shotgunred local trouble maker

    8,871
    1,083
    Mar 1, 2008
    Washington (the state)
    All the major military's in the world use plain old fmj. I am sure that fmj's have killed more people in the world than all other ammo combined.
     
  11. M 7

    M 7

    1,399
    34
    May 22, 2012
    OK, so it is "old news". :dunno:

    It is still valid.

    For Pete's sake, the analysis uses simple statistical procedures that a high school student could conduct with ease. :animlol:


    As for your opinion-

    -what proof have you to support your opinion? :headscratch:

    Have you conducted an examination of the statistical analysis (linked above) for errors? :dunno:

    Despite your opinion, the statistical analysis demonstrates otherwise.
     
    Last edited: Oct 24, 2012
  12. LASTRESORT20

    LASTRESORT20 LongTerm-Guy

    19,273
    27,490
    Aug 10, 2010
    NC

    Nope! Your not the only one....Never been a 45 guy....

    There is a G20SF near by for heavy work....so no need for the 45.
     
  13. unit1069

    unit1069

    8,239
    227
    Oct 10, 2007
    So. Central US
    International treaties determine what ammo is legally acceptable for armed conflict between sovereign states. The issue here is what is the best self-defense ammunition. LEO agencies and all reputable experts apparently agree that reliable JHP ammo is more efficient than FMJ, not that FMJ ammo isn't effective. It's just that JHP is more efficient and effective, all things being equal.
     
  14. SCmasterblaster

    SCmasterblaster Millennium Member

    18,501
    710
    Sep 24, 1999
    Hartford, Vermont
    .45 expanding to 3 FEET. Now that is an odd thought. But you're right though. Vital organs or nerves have to be lacerated or punctured. That is why I would aim for the central nerve/spine.
     
  15. Inebriated

    Inebriated

    2,449
    57
    Feb 20, 2012
    3 Feet might be a tad ambitious. lol

    But yeah, a hit's a hit, a miss is a miss. Instead of getting wrapped up in bullet type, velocity, ME, weight... worry about hitting.
     
  16. SCmasterblaster

    SCmasterblaster Millennium Member

    18,501
    710
    Sep 24, 1999
    Hartford, Vermont
    BUT, it is a funny thought. :supergrin:
     
  17. Inebriated

    Inebriated

    2,449
    57
    Feb 20, 2012
    Have you seen that Grizzly Extreme stuff? They're trying their damnedest to make it a reality.

    [​IMG]
     
  18. SCmasterblaster

    SCmasterblaster Millennium Member

    18,501
    710
    Sep 24, 1999
    Hartford, Vermont
    is one BIG hollow point! :cool::cool::cool:
     
  19. Inebriated

    Inebriated

    2,449
    57
    Feb 20, 2012
    I'm still trying to figure out what that could possibly be ideal for...
     
  20. SCmasterblaster

    SCmasterblaster Millennium Member

    18,501
    710
    Sep 24, 1999
    Hartford, Vermont
    Or maybe Osama bin Laden? :cool: