close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Finally took a sip of the H&Kool-Aid...

Discussion in 'Heckler & Koch Forum' started by KennyFSU, Nov 4, 2012.

  1. NEOH212

    NEOH212 Diesel Girl

    8,983
    12
    Mar 25, 2008
    North East Ohio


    Me too! :cool:
     

  2. The reason you don't see what the big deal is....is because there isn't. :rofl:

    I've shot my share of HK's.... (Admittedly friends).... Major yawn fest.
     

  3. KennyFSU

    KennyFSU

    1,851
    35
    Mar 14, 2011
    Florida
    Lol. This was just my initial impression.

    As others said, this gun should stand the testament of time, but only time will tell.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  4. Chuck TX

    Chuck TX CLM

    6,241
    451
    Jul 11, 2003
    Republic of Texas
    Nothing's for everybody.

    I got my first HK for the same price as a new Glock. Liked it right off the bat. Didn't take long until I unloaded most of my Glocks (except the 10mm's and longslides.).
     
  5. KennyFSU

    KennyFSU

    1,851
    35
    Mar 14, 2011
    Florida
    I guess I'm just not fancy enough.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  6. Chuck TX

    Chuck TX CLM

    6,241
    451
    Jul 11, 2003
    Republic of Texas
    So is the situation that you like it, but wonder why it cost more?

    Dropping $900 on a pistol can be a hard pill to swallow. Especially if it doesn't exactly knock your socks off.
     
  7. brisk21

    brisk21

    4,206
    16
    May 13, 2008
    Michigan

    See, now you're just full of it. There is no proof that HK pistols as a whole last longer than Glocks. They will both last pretty much forever.

    And this kind of shows where you are coming from. Colt really mostly makes lower end 1911s. Parts quality and fitting on Colt 1911s are nothing special, as they are equalled or surpassed by many companies such as Springfield, S&W, Dan Wesson, STI, Kimber, and several more.

    Im a huge fan of my HK45 and i do feel that it is pretty much the best handgun I own. Not because of longevity though. My point is that there is no greatest, supreme pistol. For every Wilson Combat there is a Les Baer. For every Sig there is an HK. For every Glock there is an M&P.
     
  8. KennyFSU

    KennyFSU

    1,851
    35
    Mar 14, 2011
    Florida
    In all honesty, I put 300 rounds through it last night and although it was accurate, it didn't really do anything that my Glock couldn't do (sans thumb safety and decocker). I guess it just didn't justify the $900 price tag for me.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  9. cowboy1964

    cowboy1964

    20,453
    2,526
    Sep 4, 2009
    U.S.A.
    What were you hoping for/expecting? To me the main things are ergonomics, reliability/confidence in that reliability, and shootability. I'm still looking for that "perfect" handgun. For now my #1 is still a compact Glock.
     
  10. Well of course... Contrary to what some of the fanboys say and uber fan girl neo who thinks hk's are the greatest thing ever, it REALLY is tough to justify $900 for a polymer pistol no matter what the situation is.

    IMO hk's are like buying brand name clothing...There really isn't anything to justify the jump in price except the name, and only that matters to people who give a crap about the name at all..

    You see I'm not cutting on hk's ... If they were just expensive it would be "one" thing... But their pricing is really dripping into the "offensive " category, considering what they are. Mass produced, (forgive me) predominantly 'plastic' guns. They really don't offer anything over an "average" gun, nor has anyone been able to show me otherwise.

    As for "ergonomics" that's personal preference and in the case of these kinds of guns, it's just a function of how they pour the plastic into the mold :whistling::shocked::upeyes:
     
    Last edited: Nov 11, 2012
  11. NEOH212

    NEOH212 Diesel Girl

    8,983
    12
    Mar 25, 2008
    North East Ohio
    Believe what you want.

    HK still has the lower failure rate. Glocks last forever. Just ask anyone on the internet that has shot 100,000+ rounds out of theirs......:whistling:

    I've had the Glocks, Sigs, and HK's. I've had more Glocks break than Sigs and HK's. Granted, I have never fired 100,000+ rounds out of any one of my guns but the failure rate of the Glocks I've had compared to the others says something.

    I'll never say HK is supreme or for everyone but they ARE the best polymer pistol on the market.
     
    Last edited: Nov 11, 2012
  12. RetailNinja

    RetailNinja

    1,229
    2
    Jan 31, 2007
    Tuktoyaktuk
    I had an H&K USP .40 while owning a Glock 35 and Beretta 96G at the same time. The USP was certainly at the top in terms of looks, fit and finish, and functionally efficient. Unfortunately, I was genetically predisposed to have gyspy fingers that I literally cannot wrap around the gun. My shooting looked like buck shot at 30 feet. Sold it. I would buy a P30L if I didn't meet my current wife, the 1911.
     
  13. Here look.. I fixed it for you!
     
  14. brisk21

    brisk21

    4,206
    16
    May 13, 2008
    Michigan

    hahahahaha:rofl::rofl::rofl:
     
  15. brisk21

    brisk21

    4,206
    16
    May 13, 2008
    Michigan

    Its not about beliefs. You say HK is supreme to Glock. For you, maybe that is true. But it is subjective. There are plenty of people that would say the opposite. I REALLY like my HK45. If I could only own one pistol that would be it. Its not like were comparing HK to a Jennings pistol. There is a standard of quality and reliability that is needed to be a premier pisol and HK, Glock, Sig, Springfield, and Smith and Wesson all attain. After that it is all preference. I see what all the buzz about HK is now, and i appriciate it, but Glocks are excellent and you can't deny that.
     
  16. sns3guppy

    sns3guppy

    4,976
    1,232
    Sep 4, 2006
    It's tough for you to justify that. I don't justify it. I simply make the purchase.

    If I'm rationalizing, I probably shouldn't be buying it. I own various HK handguns (and rifles) not because I justified or rationalized them, but because I decided to buy them. I haven't regretted them. I shoot them, and I carry them. It wouldn't hurt my feelings a bit if they were the same price as a Glock, but none of my 1911's are the same price either.

    Polymer...steel...who cares? It's reliable.

    Is HK the be-all and end-all of brands? I don't know. I don't care. They do what they're advertised to do. They do that well. I own Berettas, Rugers, Sigs, HK's, Springfields, yada, yada, yada...most of them are just fine. The HK's aren't tough to justify at all, and the price isn't that out of line with other better production handguns.
     
  17. KennyFSU

    KennyFSU

    1,851
    35
    Mar 14, 2011
    Florida
    I think that's the main argument here; what makes them BETTER than a $500 Glock? To me, nothing.
     
  18. 01deuce

    01deuce

    65
    0
    Dec 6, 2009
    Northern Indiana

    Well, you don't have to get the extractor of the week to make it work right!
     
  19. brisk21

    brisk21

    4,206
    16
    May 13, 2008
    Michigan
    Glock and HK are both AWSOME guns. They are probably 2 of the best. Enough said.
     
  20. KennyFSU

    KennyFSU

    1,851
    35
    Mar 14, 2011
    Florida
    I've only owned 3 Glocks, all were 9mm and gen 3s and they have always been 100%. :tongueout:
     
    Last edited: Nov 14, 2012