close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Federal court strikes down NC emergency gun ban

Discussion in 'Carry Issues' started by Professor Zero, Mar 29, 2012.


  1. Professor Zero

    Professor Zero
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2005
    134
    2
    Location:
    Edge of the Charleston metroplex
    http://saf.org/viewpr-new.asp?id=397

    BELLEVUE, WA - A federal district court judge in North Carolina has just
    struck down that state's emergency power to impose a ban on firearms and
    ammunition outside the home during a declared emergency, ruling that the
    provision violates the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.

    The case, Bateman v. Purdue, was brought by the Second Amendment
    Foundation, Grass Roots North Carolina FFE and three individual
    plaintiffs. Defendants in the case were Gov. Beverly Purdue and Reuben
    F. Young, secretary of the state's Department of Crime Control and
    Public Safety, in their official capacities.

    In his opinion, Judge Malcolm J. Howard, senior United States district
    judge for the Eastern District of North Carolina, wrote, "the court
    finds that the statutes at issue here are subject to strict
    scrutiny...While the bans imposed pursuant to these statutes may be
    limited in duration, it cannot be overlooked that the statutes strip
    peaceable, law abiding citizens of the right to arm themselves in
    defense of hearth and home, striking at the very core of the Second
    Amendment."

    "When SAF attorney Alan Gura won the Heller case at the Supreme Court,"
    noted SAF Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb, "the gun ban crowd
    said that we were a one-trick-pony' and that we would never knock out
    another gun law. Well, SAF has now knocked out gun laws in Maryland,
    Illinois and North Carolina.

    "We filed this lawsuit on the day we won the McDonald case against
    Chicago," he added, "extending the Second Amendment to all 50 states.
    This was part of our strategy of winning firearms freedoms one lawsuit
    at a time."

    Gottlieb pointed to language in Judge Howard's ruling that solidifies
    the Second Amendment's reach outside the home. The judge noted that the
    Supreme Court in Heller noted that the right to keep and bear arms "was
    valued not only for preserving the militia, but 'more important(ly) for
    self-defense and hunting."

    "Therefore," Judge Malcolm wrote, "the Second Amendment right to keep
    and bear arms 'is not strictly limited to the home environment but
    extends in some form to wherever those activities or needs occur."

    "Under the laws at issue here, citizens are prohibited from engaging,
    outside their home, in any activities secured by the Second Amendment,"
    Judge Malcolm wrote. They may not carry defensive weapons outside the
    home, hunt or engage in firearm related sporting activities.
    Additionally, although the statutes do not directly regulate the
    possession of firearms within the home, they effectively prohibit law
    abiding citizens from purchasing and transporting to their homes
    firearms and ammunition needed for self-defense. As such, these laws
    burden conduct protected by the Second Amendment."
     

    Wanna kill these ads? We can help!
    #1 Professor Zero, Mar 29, 2012
    Last edited: Mar 29, 2012
  2. Elitematch

    Elitematch
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2011
    4
    0
    Location:
    Eastern NC
    Its about time..

    Sent from my DROID X2 using Tapatalk
     

  3. kirgi08

    kirgi08
    Expand Collapse
    Southern Rogue.
    Silver Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2007
    34,001
    3,190
    Location:
    Acme proving grounds.
  4. Navitimer

    Navitimer
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2009
    816
    0
    That's great to hear! In the past there have been "states of emergency" declared for things such as hurricanes, etc., so it will be good to know that carry during those times cannot be prohibited. Thanks for posting this!
     
  5. Warp

    Warp
    Expand Collapse
    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2005
    16,225
    272
    Location:
    Atlanta
    Good deal.
     
  6. Gunnut 45/454

    Gunnut 45/454
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2002
    12,129
    9
    Well it's good to here that the courts actually read the true meaning of the 2nd! That every American can and should be able to defend themselves EVERYWHERE at anytime and place!:supergrin:
     
  7. TSAX

    TSAX
    Expand Collapse
    USAF Vet

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2010
    10,162
    7
    It would be nice if more states were like this.







    :50cal:
     
  8. RenegadeGlocker

    RenegadeGlocker
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2001
    4,687
    688
    Location:
    Texas
    Expect more if filed by competent attorneys like these.

    Just as Roe took down a lot of anti-abortion laws, Heller/ McDonald is going to take down a lot of anti-gun laws.
     
  9. unit1069

    unit1069
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    8,115
    163
    Location:
    So. Central US
    During the Hurricane Katrina disaster the people of Louisiana learned how Democrat/"progressive" governments will use emergency powers to seize lawfully-owned weapons.

    I'm surprised North Carolina would attempt the same State power grab. There must be a Democrat/"progressive" equation in operation here.
     
  10. bear62

    bear62
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2005
    1,460
    19
    Location:
    Rocky Mountains
    Well ........ we needed some good news!!!!!!!!!
     
  11. LoadToadBoss

    LoadToadBoss
    Expand Collapse
    IYAAYWOT

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2008
    3,480
    71
    Location:
    Northwest Louisiana
    I said it before and I'll say it again. In an emergency situation, it doesn't matter what the law says the authorities can or cannot do. They will do what they think they need to do and then let the lawyers hash it out when things settle down. All a LEO needs to do is claim "officer safety" and you're handing your firearm over, especially when possessing the firearm in public during a declared emergency. After years of litigation, the government gets its hand slapped and Joe Private Citizen is out thousands in attorney's fees.
     
    #11 LoadToadBoss, Mar 30, 2012
    Last edited: Mar 30, 2012
  12. redbaron007

    redbaron007
    Expand Collapse
    Some Dude
    Lifetime Member
    1. The Outpost Lounge

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2009
    7,963
    43
    Location:
    SWMO
    I wonder if they will appeal it.

    Good for North Carolina!! CONGRATS!!! :thumbsup:


    :wavey:

    red
     
  13. kirgi08

    kirgi08
    Expand Collapse
    Southern Rogue.
    Silver Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2007
    34,001
    3,190
    Location:
    Acme proving grounds.
    East of Charlotte is pretty much "left",west of Charlotte is "right". Asheville being as far left as DC is.:upeyes:

    :whistling: :supergrin:
     
  14. Arc Angel

    Arc Angel
    Expand Collapse
    Deus Vult!

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    6,920
    6
    Location:
    Penn's Woods
    Good! Even though I don't live there I was aware of this law, and thought it a patent violation of peoples' Second Amendment rights.
     
  15. toshbar

    toshbar
    Expand Collapse
    Timber Baron

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2009
    4,146
    13
    Location:
    Eastern NC
  16. ArmoryDoc

    ArmoryDoc
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    May 14, 2006
    4,066
    40
    Location:
    Kansas
    Why are we so brainwashed to believe it takes a Federal Court to affirm our rights to keep and bear arms. It's already written in the Constitution. "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED".
     
  17. kirgi08

    kirgi08
    Expand Collapse
    Southern Rogue.
    Silver Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2007
    34,001
    3,190
    Location:
    Acme proving grounds.
    If'n they don't,whom will? .'08.
     
  18. Arc Angel

    Arc Angel
    Expand Collapse
    Deus Vult!

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    6,920
    6
    Location:
    Penn's Woods
    Try explaining this to the state legislatures of: New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Maryland, Delaware, and California. All of whom are flagrant violators of the people's rights to keep AND bear arms. ;)
     
  19. ArmoryDoc

    ArmoryDoc
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    May 14, 2006
    4,066
    40
    Location:
    Kansas
    I know. And we not only keep turning our backs when these politicians do this stuff but we keep electing these violators of our rights. Until the "people" get tired of it, it will continue. Sad.
     
  20. redbaron007

    redbaron007
    Expand Collapse
    Some Dude
    Lifetime Member
    1. The Outpost Lounge

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2009
    7,963
    43
    Location:
    SWMO
    Theoretically speaking...you are correct.

    However, reality speaking....it ain't that easy, unfortunately! :crying:

    :wavey:

    red