Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Forum at

Why should YOU join our forums?

  • Reason #1
  • Reason #2
  • Reason #3

Site Description

Fast and Furious

Discussion in 'Cop Talk' started by Sam Spade, Nov 4, 2011.

  1. A valid LE operation run well, Holder acted properly.

    0 vote(s)
  2. A valid LE operation gone wrong. Holder didn't know.

    0 vote(s)
  3. An improper LE action, but unknown to DoJ

    0 vote(s)
  4. An improper LE action, known to DoJ and pursued for political reasons

    0 vote(s)
  1. Sam Spade

    Sam Spade Staff Member Lifetime Member

    May 4, 2003
    For some bizzaro reason, the FOP has decided to offer a nod of support to Eric Holder, prior to his testimony on Fast and Furious.

    Personally, I don't think that's reflective of the working cop's point of view. I'd like to hear what y'all say. I know we have non-LE visitors here. I welcome your comments, but would ask that you not vote in the poll, so it can reflect the street's POV. Thanks.
    Last edited: Nov 4, 2011
  2. The National FOP supported Holder during his confirmation hearings, so this is no surprise...Go figure...:dunno:

  3. Hunca Munca

    Hunca Munca nonplussed

    Dec 20, 2006
    allegheny county
    My take:

    Fast and Furious was a political operation set up to "prove" the US was the source of Mexican gun violence. The plan was to then use this "evidence" as a basis for further gun control initiatives in the US. Holder knew. Obama knew.
  4. I didn't vote because none of the choices reflect what I think happened.

    To me, intel is the most important thing if you're interested in bring down organizations, not just individual little soldiers. If you're interested in just individual soldiers, then a buy-and-bust approach is the way to go. If you're interested in bringing down a large chunk of the organization, the first thing you need is a roadmap of the organization's structure. Tracing guns is one way. Tracing money is another.

    Of course, everything is complicated by the fact that the operation involved a foreign country. (Are there U.S. laws that forbid the ATF from doing this? (I don't know)).

    So I would vote for "A valid operation that appears to have gone wrong. (Maybe even accurate to say it spiraled out of control). Don't know (or care) if Holder knew. Some people within ATF were trying to think outside the box, and yeah, it came back to bite them in the ass. Yeah, innocent LEOs and others were killed. But if they were't killed by 'Fast & Furious' guns, they would likely have been killed by other guns."

    Does it look bad for ATF? Absolutely.

    Guns don't kill people. People kill people. If those killers didn't have access to 'Fast and Furious' guns, they would have gotten other guns. Plenty of other people are supplying the Cartels.
    Last edited: Nov 4, 2011
  5. alwaysshootin


    Nov 14, 2005
    No ifs, ands, or, buts, about it, this, is the reason for "Fast and Furious"! Lame street media, was touting that 90% of the illegal guns in Mexico were from the U.S., causing the need for reimplementing the AWB, well before FAF, was disclosed. It was a complete setup, to obtain objectives for the anti gun crowd.
  6. Dragoon44

    Dragoon44 Unfair Facist Lifetime Member

    Apr 30, 2005
    I am not surprised. unless there has been a radical change national FOP has ALWAYS been anti gun and pro gun control.
  7. p.d.


    Aug 4, 2009
    Dry Ridge, Kentucky
    As has the IACP.
  8. Glockdude1

    Glockdude1 Federal Member CLM

    May 24, 2000
  9. blueiron


    Aug 10, 2004
    Anyone who believes that this operation was conducted without the knowledge of and explicit consent of BATFE, DOJ, Dep't of State, and the White House is either unknowing as to how government works or disingenuous.

    A government LE agency cannot conduct operations into another sovereign nation that involve contraband into that nation without the consent of everyone in the entire cleared chain of command. To do so otherwise, would be inviting huge national and lack of control rogue agency repercussions otherwise. This does not include the international repercussions when the affected nation found out what was occurring. Either everyone knew or BATFE is out of control and a rogue agency. No one inside or outside of government is asking which.

    What appears to be simple exportation of firearms by a U.S. gov't agency is the equivalent of the government of Mexico formally exporting illegal narcotics into the United States. The Mexicans do not want more firearms in their nation and they have strict gun control.

    This is a calculated clandestine maneuver that has blown up and has repercussions on both sides of the border. Both Mexicans and U.S. citizens have been killed by a stupid operation that was dreamt up by moronic bureaucrats looking for an internal promotion.
  10. merlynusn


    Nov 16, 2007
    +1 :agree:
  11. glock192327

    glock192327 Where is eye

  12. CAcop


    Jul 21, 2002
    I can't think of a vaild reason to allow guns to cross the border. What are they planning with that op? To get drug kingpins on weapons violations? Drug dealing and murder are the two biggest businesses for these cartels. Why not focus on that? What does adding guns to that mix cause? Why tell gun dealers to violate the law after they reported attempted illegal purchases as required by law?

    I say it again. I cannot think of a vaild reason why any law enforcement officer would allow guns to walk. IF the AG or any other official has a good reason I would be willing to listen. So far I haven't heard a good one yet. And you would think if there was they would have said it by now.
  13. jethro21


    Nov 28, 2003
    We participated in Fast and Furious in the last days of the operation, long before any of this came to light, however we never (in the ops I was a part of) let the weapons leave the stateand we took them all off after several straw purchases.

    I will say this, the indecisiveness of the feds working it was frustrating and concerning. We played a very small support part of this operation (surveillance and traffic stops) so I wouldn't expect a full briefing on the purpose of the operation, but my feeling was it was politically motivated and very poorly run.

    The numbers of American guns in Mexico is badly skewed to make us look bad. We are only given access to a small portion of the guns taken each year to run numbers on.
  14. Scattergun1187

    Scattergun1187 Vote Republican

    Jul 24, 2010
    Eric Holder is responsible for this fiasco and needs to resign along with the Commander in Thief.
  15. captcurly


    Sep 14, 2008
    Southern Delaware

    Hunca, I am with you on this 100% and I am a Life Member of an FOP Lodge and I do not support the corrupt Holder. I would not trust Holder as far as I can spit. Just watch this clown's eye and body movements when being questioned. This guy cannot be trusted.
  16. blueiron


    Aug 10, 2004
    Well, considering that the gun store on West Peoria Avenue was cajoled by BATFE into being one of the wholesalers to the BATFE circus, it isn't surprising. GPD should have been told early on, but it is probably a good thing that their aren't being implicated now for complicity.

    One of the employees there was a Fed 1811 [now retired] that I worked with, the owner was promised the Moon for cooperation, and the entire store staff got screwed over with bad publicity/some protests/and plenty of demonization in the local press.

    I stopped in to buy stuff and even I saw suspicious activities in the store and area. When I brought it to the store's attention, it was hinted to me to leave it alone :whistling:.

    Any patrol officer would have noticed it and of course, the Feds don't like to share until it is almost over. :dunno:
  17. ericridebike


    Dec 18, 2010

    Sorry, I voted before I fully read your post & am a non-LEO. I picked the last option. I think the DOJ was fully aware and trying to further their anti-gun agenda.
  18. Please disregard my vote as well. I didn't see your request until after I voted. I also took the last option.
  19. Hack

    Hack Crazy CO Gold Member

    I think it was a mixture of being started out as legitimate but got out of hand. When it wasn't stopped I blamed the top office holder in this, as it is his show, and his responsibility to keep up these things. I do believe it was politically motivated.
  20. Angry Fist

    Angry Fist Dehumanizer® Lifetime Member

    Dec 30, 2009
    Hellbilly Hill
    I smell a rat... :whistling:

    I just wonder who the biggest fish going down is.