close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Talk

Why should YOU join our Glock forum?

  • Converse with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Learn about the latest hunting products
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.

Ex-cop Mehserle who killed Oscar Grant at Oakland train station released

Discussion in 'The Furball Forum' started by Black Smoke Trail, Jun 13, 2011.

  1. El_Ron1

    El_Ron1 AAAAAAAAGHHH!!!

    63,128
    87
    Apr 15, 2004
    Redneck Sparta
    Oscar would have cured cancer by now and been close to conquering AIDS as well.
     


  2. He meant to use a stun gun on the handcuffed & face-down victim, but drew his pistol instead.

    Oops.

    If he wasn't carrying a stun gun, he wouldn't have killed anyone.
     
  3. Black Smoke Trail

    Black Smoke Trail

    875
    0
    May 17, 2011
    On second thought you have a good point there. Apparently you think that anyone who does not meet your expectations or standards of humanity should be executed. Very efficient and effective.

    This line of logic and superior thinking has been employed by very famous and effective leaders throughout history. Pol Pot, Mao Tse Tung, Adolf Hitler, and Joeseph Stalin just to name a few. .

    Superior thinking such as that must not allow minor details like due process, natural born rights, and Constitutional freedoms to get in the way. These concepts and value are wasted on lowly minions like Oscar Grant. Right? :upeyes:

    I am sure Mehserle will go on to perfect the cold fusion process and move on to solving global warming.
     
    Last edited: Jun 13, 2011
  4. cowboywannabe

    cowboywannabe you savvy?

    21,404
    5,035
    Jan 26, 2001
    baaa....punks murder intentionally and get 7 years served.....this is just par for that same course.
     
  5. Black Smoke Trail

    Black Smoke Trail

    875
    0
    May 17, 2011
    That was the euphamistic rationalization given for the attrocity. Even if in fact true, there was absolutely no reason to taser a cuffed subdued man laying on his stomach.

    Going with Mehserle's rationalization, he was intending to torture Oscar Grant with his taser. Still not exactly honorable intentions to say the least.

    There will always be disagreement over the taser but in my opinion, when abused or used on improper persons, the taser IS a lethal weapon.
     
    Last edited: Jun 13, 2011
  6. Black Smoke Trail

    Black Smoke Trail

    875
    0
    May 17, 2011
    EXACTLY. Mehserle is NOT the focal point here. The focus should be on the judicial system that allowed this attrocity and abortion of justice to happen.
     
  7. Natty

    Natty

    3,008
    0
    Jan 28, 2006
    Maryland/Virginia
    Obviously officer Mehserle wasn't scared and fearing for his life, or he would have shot 15 times.
     
  8. voyager4520

    voyager4520 -----

    8,589
    0
    Apr 25, 2009
    SE Colorado
    Maybe Tasers should be redesigned so you don't pull a trigger to fire them. And maybe they shouldn't be shaped like a gun.

    With all the liability lawyers circling every aspect of life like sharks I'm surprised a "less-lethal" law enforcement weapon would be shaped like a handgun.
     
    Last edited: Jun 13, 2011
  9. cowboywannabe

    cowboywannabe you savvy?

    21,404
    5,035
    Jan 26, 2001
    its supposed to be worn on your "weak side" so you have to make a concious decision to use it instead of your handgun.
     
  10. Mayhem like Me

    Mayhem like Me Semper Paratus

    17,801
    3,702
    Mar 13, 2001
    Behind the Green door
    I'm glad he's out , however, he was criminally negligent, he shot a man he meant to taze.
    Some people do not belong in this line of work becasue they vaporlock under stress I am sorry that he had to find that out on the job.

    And sorry for the needless loss of life.
     
  11. redneck1861

    redneck1861

    342
    0
    Jan 7, 2011
    I agree
     
  12. Brucev

    Brucev

    9,189
    5
    Jul 19, 2009
    He's out. He got away with murder. Now that he's no longer being protected. He probably better pay a lot of attention to his rear view mirror.
     
  13. BonoVox

    BonoVox CLM

    285
    0
    Feb 23, 2007
    CalCCW.com California
    Lame.
     
  14. Brucev

    Brucev

    9,189
    5
    Jul 19, 2009
    "Lame?" He is a murderer. He got away with murder. He is now out on the streets. He is no longer has any government provided protection. He has to take care of himself. He'll need to keep his eyes open. People have long memories.
     
  15. Wasn't "murder"... there was no malice aforethought... he made a hugely tragic mistake that cost the victim his life and him his career and future. Bad situation all the way around.
     
  16. Brucev

    Brucev

    9,189
    5
    Jul 19, 2009
    "Wasn''t 'murder'...?" Really. If a criminal had had a officer on the ground and put a round in the back of his head, it would be murder. This is no different.
     
  17. Sam Spade

    Sam Spade Lifetime Member

    14,807
    2,120
    May 4, 2003
    You gotta be ****ing me. No difference between the two---really? No difference between a guy who's a criminal from the start deliberately shooting someone and a guy who's trying to make a lawful arrest of an actual criminal and screws it up.

    What a disgusting point of view, from someone obviously lacking in discernment and judgement. Next time, call MS13 instead of 911; we'll all be happier.
     
  18. Brucev

    Brucev

    9,189
    5
    Jul 19, 2009
    I am sure you and the other posters at this site are fine men. I do not doubt your commitment to professionalism and integrity. In the late 70's and early 80's I had a lot of fun working with friends who were in LE in New Orleans. There were fine men. In this case, I do not at all agree with anyone who wants to give this man a pass for blowing another man's brains out because he made a mistake. I count him a murderer without excuse. Had I been on his jury, he would have had to really "walk on water" to have made me see it any differently. Accident? The same thing from anyone else, a homeowner holding a criminal at gunpoint on the floor for instance, would have been judged far differently. There is no reason to cut this man any slack. Closing ranks? I understand the impluse. I also know that it is a mistake. I know ministers who have been accused of crimes. Some have been guilty. Others have been simply accused. Evidence collected by police proved them completely innocent of the charge. However, I do understand the impulse. It is hard to accept failure on the part of a colleague. Further, it damages the profession. Those with a high level of trust and responsibility must accept that they are held to a higher standard than simply that of a reasonable man. Failure to hold those who fail to the highest standards only makes things harder for those who hold to those standards.
     
  19. Did you watch the video and see the officer's expression and reaction when his "taser" went "bang"? Murder requires malice aforethought of which there was obviously none here. This was manslaughter and a tragic mistake and completely different than your example of a criminal executing an officer.