close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

DUI checkpoint video goes viral

Discussion in 'Civil Liberties Issues' started by Stephenthesuave, Jul 7, 2013.


  1. plp

    plp
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2013
    5,681
    2,319
    Location:
    Redneck Riveria
    It emphasizes the rift being driven between those sworn to serve and protect and those whom expect some degree of privacy.

    By law, being on the public roads gives LE the right to maintain safety for the public domain. Checkpoints send out a strong message to those whom would drink or drug, then drive, that this is not smart.
     

    #2 plp, Jul 8, 2013
    Last edited: Jul 8, 2013
  2. BenjiEDF

    BenjiEDF
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2012
    837
    1
    He was guilty of contempt of cop and I'm pretty sure that's a law, I don't know for a fact but just shut up and do what your told... sheesh!
     
    #3 BenjiEDF, Jul 9, 2013
    Last edited: Jul 9, 2013
  3. JBnTX

    JBnTX
    Expand Collapse
    Texas

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2008
    19,556
    3,613
    Location:
    Texas
    What are idiots like that trying to prove?
    He's just another constitutional "expert" that has no clue.

    ..
     
    #4 JBnTX, Jul 9, 2013
    Last edited: Jul 9, 2013
  4. TBO

    TBO
    Expand Collapse
    Why so serious?
    CLM
    1. The Outpost Lounge

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    43,103
    12,079
    Location:
    3500 Cedar Ave S. Minneapolis, MN 55407
  5. eaglefrq

    eaglefrq
    Expand Collapse
    NRA Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2009
    1,524
    40
    Location:
    The Twilight Zone
    What do you mean? His window appeared to be rolled down approx 3 inches. Why does he have to roll it all the way down?

    I know the checkpoints have been ruled constitutional by the SCOTUS, but other than rolling his window all the way down what did he do wrong?
     
  6. JBnTX

    JBnTX
    Expand Collapse
    Texas

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2008
    19,556
    3,613
    Location:
    Texas
    So the police officer can do his job and smell for alcohol and drugs.

    This is not about a person's rights. It's about certain people with a burr up their ass for some reason, so they get a video camera and go cause an encounter with a police officer.

    These people are immature idiots that have no concept of "rights" or anything else.

    Those police officers are there for public safety, and it infringes on no one's rights to cooperate with them.

    To do what this idiot did is not only offensive to those police officers, but offensive to society.

    It has nothing to do with constitutional rights, the founding fathers, big government, tyranny, fascism, Nazi Germany or any of the other crap these idiots spew on a daily basis.

    ..
     
    #7 JBnTX, Jul 10, 2013
    Last edited: Jul 10, 2013
  7. NorthCarolinaLiberty

    NorthCarolinaLiberty
    Expand Collapse
    MentalDefective

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2009
    5,145
    0
    Location:
    Tax Funded Mental Institution
    Except it's been shown time and time and time again that roadblocks actually make the roads less safe. This information is so widespread that it should be common knowledge by now.
     
  8. SGT HATRED

    SGT HATRED
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2010
    3,962
    270
    Location:
    PHX AZ
    If you DON'T have a problem with, then YOU are part of the problem...
     
  9. BobPistol

    BobPistol
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    May 19, 2013
    286
    1
    Another cop who thinks the plebes must obey him unconditionally. These bad apples make LEO's look bad.
     
  10. eyelikeglasses

    eyelikeglasses
    Expand Collapse
    Hooah, Hooah.

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2009
    1,777
    2
    Location:
    The Sunshine State
    I know. Some cops need to read up on the Constitution.:wavey: Like how it should be capitalized, for example.
     
    #11 eyelikeglasses, Jul 10, 2013
    Last edited: Jul 10, 2013
  11. Stephenthesuave

    Stephenthesuave
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2012
    194
    0
    Location:
    Knoxville, TN
    Yeah serf, shut up and comply.
     
  12. JBnTX

    JBnTX
    Expand Collapse
    Texas

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2008
    19,556
    3,613
    Location:
    Texas
    Do you have a source for that information?
     
  13. chickenwing

    chickenwing
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2010
    1,955
    34
    Resistance is futile.

    Sent from my SPH-L900 using Ohub Campfire mobile app
     
  14. RickD

    RickD
    Expand Collapse
    Pro-Open Curry
    Millennium Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 1999
    3,746
    137
    Location:
    Arizona
    http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/2011-03-25-scofflaws25_ST_N.htm

    Some info and citations of studies (up and down). I include this pull-quote:

    http://www.summitdaily.com/article/20120825/LETTER/120829894

    Associated with the Natl Beverage Institute
    Same NBI study quoted in another article:

    A pro meta study cited by the habitually political CDC but not conducted by CDC:

    http://www.cdc.gov/motorvehiclesafety/impaired_driving/checkpoint.html

     
  15. NorthCarolinaLiberty

    NorthCarolinaLiberty
    Expand Collapse
    MentalDefective

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2009
    5,145
    0
    Location:
    Tax Funded Mental Institution
  16. NorthCarolinaLiberty

    NorthCarolinaLiberty
    Expand Collapse
    MentalDefective

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2009
    5,145
    0
    Location:
    Tax Funded Mental Institution
    It's interesting that the CDC itself rated all of those 20+ studies. They rated only three of the methodologies as good. The other 20 were rated fair.

    If you look at each study, then you start seeing those flaws. One study discusses how patrols had a similar effect to roadblocks, so the effect was not differentiated. Another study measuring deterrence found confounding variables when comparing different cities because of the overlap in the media coverage advertising the roadblocks.

    Half of those studies are from other countries, the ones that use random breath testing. You can also look at that link and see the studies are from the 1980s and even 1970s. A lot of change happened in the 1980s regarding tolerance of drunks, and those studies really don't differentiate between other variables that also had an impact to reduce drunk driving in the 1980s.
     
  17. .264 magnum

    .264 magnum
    Expand Collapse
    CLM

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2002
    12,555
    261
    Location:
    Dallas TX
    Craziest post of the year right there.
     
  18. .264 magnum

    .264 magnum
    Expand Collapse
    CLM

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2002
    12,555
    261
    Location:
    Dallas TX