close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Does Sig have some of the WORST blueing?

Discussion in 'General Firearms Forum' started by DaBurna, May 25, 2012.


  1. DaBurna

    DaBurna
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    2,476
    89
    Location:
    Bama Boy
    I've seen them used and new in the case and the finish suuuuuure does wear off quick! Not that it affects reliability, but if in gonna plunk down >$800 I'd be PISSED if it was worn off in a couple of months.... HK's seem to have that same issue, especially on the barrel hoods. They are completely a different color oftentimes...
     

    Wanna kill these ads? We can help!
  2. diamondd2

    diamondd2
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2010
    1,004
    79
    Both are way overrated. Especially for the price.
     

  3. Dan

    Dan
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2001
    1,155
    0
    Location:
    Norfolk or Blue Ridge, VA
    I work p/t in a shop as the gun tech, I have sent a few Sigs back lately for warranty work for various reasons. The last one was a Sig 1911 c3, 3 months old and the stainless slide is pitting.

    Customer sure wasn't happy with them.
     
  4. fnfalman

    fnfalman
    Expand Collapse
    Chicks Dig It

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2000
    50,197
    3,035
    Location:
    California & New Mexico, US
    Which new SIG has bluing? Aren't they all blackened stainless steel nowadays?
     
  5. Restless28

    Restless28
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2008
    16,152
    2
    Location:
    Solsbury Hill
    Care to explain that position?
     
  6. oldnoob

    oldnoob
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2008
    3,927
    3
    Location:
    City of Angel, California
    Their nitron finish wan't the nicest finish I have seem. But any finish short of poly coat the gun will not hold up for serious user or holstering wear.
     
  7. Bruce M

    Bruce M
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2010
    38,372
    8,995
    Location:
    S FL
    Care to share your experience with both?
     
  8. Boot Stomper

    Boot Stomper
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2010
    2,981
    145
    Location:
    Metro East of IL
    I have an older P229 I carry for work and it has a lot of holster wear. The blue or black (the slide is slainless steel) finish of the gun is very poor. Everything else about the gun has been excellent. The gun is about 20 years old and it has been flawless in the ten years I have carried and shot it.

    I would post pictures, but the gun is at work. Sorry.
     
    #8 Boot Stomper, May 26, 2012
    Last edited: May 26, 2012
  9. TxGlock9

    TxGlock9
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2010
    4,960
    17
    Location:
    BMT, TX

    +3...
     
    #9 TxGlock9, May 26, 2012
    Last edited: May 26, 2012
  10. diamondd2

    diamondd2
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2010
    1,004
    79
    Neither can do anything better than my $500 Glock.
     
  11. Restless28

    Restless28
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2008
    16,152
    2
    Location:
    Solsbury Hill
    Weak.
     
  12. oldnoob

    oldnoob
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2008
    3,927
    3
    Location:
    City of Angel, California
    Get a Hi point. Save yourself $400 more.

    :upeyes:
     
  13. arclight610

    arclight610
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2009
    3,038
    0
    Except run rings around it in accuracy among many other things. I own both brands, and I really like both. However, there are some things the Sig can do better.
     
  14. diamondd2

    diamondd2
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2010
    1,004
    79
    But true.

    Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine
     
  15. diamondd2

    diamondd2
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2010
    1,004
    79
    Hi point is not considered a premium gun.


    Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine
     
  16. diamondd2

    diamondd2
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2010
    1,004
    79
    Mechanically the Sig is no more accurate than a Glock. But if that's what you need to say to justify the 50%-75% premium that's fine. You just ain't fooling me.


    Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine
     
  17. Restless28

    Restless28
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2008
    16,152
    2
    Location:
    Solsbury Hill
    Back it up. As has been stated, show some evidence that its true.:wavey:
     
  18. diamondd2

    diamondd2
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2010
    1,004
    79
    Let's see.

    Glock:

    Lighter
    More reliable
    More capacity
    Longer barrel per class
    Longer sight radius per class
    Simpler (1 tool to take apart)
    Better finish
    More compact
    More aftermarket accessories
    As or more accurate
    More sold than HK and Sigs combined
    $250-$600 less for the Glock
    Etc.

    I owned both Sigs and HK's. I thought there was some kind of advantage since I paid huge premiums to my Glocks. It took me a while but I realized the Glock is a superior engineered pistol. I since have sold off the Sigs and HK's. I did however keep 1 Beretta.



    Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine
     
    #18 diamondd2, May 26, 2012
    Last edited: May 26, 2012
  19. Gregg702

    Gregg702
    Expand Collapse
    Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2010
    8,215
    324
    Location:
    Las Vegas
    A Glock is also not considered a premium gun. They are both manufactured as inexpensively as possible, Glock just charges a more premium price.
     
  20. diamondd2

    diamondd2
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2010
    1,004
    79
    Your kidding, right?

    Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine