Yes! The Second Amendment guarantees it.
No, it's too dangerous.
Only for self defense.
<http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/poll-do-you-think-people-should-be-allowed-carry-guns-public>
AWESOME! A know it all busy body got the door slammed on his big nose and a trip to jail on top! LOL, that is just awesome sauce on top!Or this? (two open carriers in GA get in public argument about... open carry of all things)
http://politics.blog.ajc.com/2014/0...st-day-a-draw-down-in-valdosta/?__federated=1
As of 04:00 Sunday August 10 th. it is now 95K or 88% Yes!78k agree with me. Why am I such a conformist? :supergrin:
It says the right to bear arms shall not be infringed, it doesn't say "the right to secretly bear arms shall not be infringed" or "the right only to openly bear arms shall not be infringed". So, one could give an educated guess that both open and concealed carried are guaranteed under the 2nd amendment.It guarantees open carry?
More importantly, it says "infringed" not "regulated" - all regulation does not "infringe" so the 2nd Amendment, itself, says that any law that does not "infringe" (unfairly or excessively limit) is legal. Seems to me some people only read as far as "shall not."It says the right to bear arms shall not be infringed, it doesn't say "the right to secretly bear arms shall not be infringed" or "the right only to openly bear arms shall not be infringed". So, one could give an educated guess that both open and concealed carried are guaranteed under the 2nd amendment.
But I'll still kick and scream about not being able to find an MG42 or a Thompson at decent prices, since I think they're pretty guns and would love to have one, even though I could never afford to feed either one. :whistling:More importantly, it says "infringed" not "regulated" - all regulation does not "infringe" so the 2nd Amendment, itself, says that any law that does not "infringe" (unfairly or excessively limit) is legal. Seems to me some people only read as far as "shall not."
Seems like they also never read the amendment before it, that says "Congress shall make no law..." but about which Congress has made plenty of laws, because the rest of the language in it says they can.
Does that mean I have to shove my Glock in my "prison wallet" and bear down on it when I need to retrieve it? Talk about shooting the shinola.The Constitution says "bear". Bear arms. That means carry them any which way.
"People" do it all the time.
Cops, for instance, believe it or not, they are "people".
And nothing but human just like the rest of us.
Bear. That means bear, as in bear children. Like women bear children. That does not mean the government does it for you, it means that the woman carries the child with her.
That's what bear means.
Bear, as in grizzly and bare is a horse of a different color.
dc
And yeah, this poll still goes on. 88% yes at this time.
I have to agree with this.But I'll still kick and scream about not being able to find an MG42 or a Thompson at decent prices, since I think they're pretty guns and would love to have one, even though I could never afford to feed either one. :whistling: