close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Talk

Why should YOU join our Glock forum?

  • Converse with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Learn about the latest hunting products
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.

Dinky has a question!

Discussion in 'OX & Alex Forum' started by Dinky, Mar 17, 2012.

  1. Dinky

    Dinky Numpty

    9,706
    17
    May 22, 2003
    The Earth turns counter-clockwise to the East.


    Does it take less energy to drive East, as you are going with the rotation and does it take more energy to drive West, against the rotation?


    Or does it take more energy driving East, as you have to drive faster than the earth is rotating to move from one spot to the other or does it take less energy driving West as the Earth is rotating away from the direction you are going??


    Dinky would like the too know.....:dunno:
     

  2. Angry Fist

    Angry Fist Dehumanizer® Lifetime Member

    38,481
    6,429
    Dec 30, 2009
    Hellbilly Hill
    If you find yourself going the wrong way, a few 10MM's will cancel out the difference, depending on said rotation.
     
  3. Dinky

    Dinky Numpty

    9,706
    17
    May 22, 2003
    Only if you are behind me and talking:tongueout:
     
  4. uhlawpup

    uhlawpup Gentle Soul

    4,908
    865
    Nov 18, 2003
    Houston
    Congratulations on an intelligent question!

    Ignoring atmospheric resistance, it takes the same amount of energy to overcome your vehicle's inertia, since the gravitational center is for all practical purposes right below you, no matter which way on the surface you head.
     
  5. Dinky

    Dinky Numpty

    9,706
    17
    May 22, 2003

    So if I took a 10mm and shot it to the West, the Earth would speed up and if I shot it to the East once, the Earth would slow and if I shot it twice would the Earth stop?


    How is that for an intelligent question?
     
    Last edited: Mar 17, 2012
  6. tous

    tous GET A ROPE!

    30,789
    26,128
    Jan 7, 2001
    Plano, Texas, Republic of
    uhlawpup has a portion of the answer. If the Earth were a sphere, the force required to overcome gravity on the surface of the sphere produced by both mass and rotational velocity would be the same.

    You mention moving either along the vector of rotation or 180 degrees from the vector of rotation, so your working theory is that movong the in direction or rotation gives you a sort of tailwind and hus, you need less energy, no?

    Here's a clue. The two moving objects, car and planet are always moving relative to each other, not idependently.

    Let's use a smaller-scale example. Consider, you are on an aircraft traveling 965 kph. Assume that direction of travel, altitude and friction don't affect the experiment. The test procedure is to walk a fixed distance at the constant velocity from the aft forward and walk the same distance, same constant velocity from forward to aft. If your theory is valid, it should take less effort to move aft to forward that forward to aft, no?

    Consider, you are moving at 965 kph in some direction. When you walk from the rwar of the aircraft to the front, in the direction of travel, let's say at 2 kph, are you going 2 kph or 967 kph? When you move in the opposite direction, are you moving 2 kph or 963 kph?

    Hus! You now have enough information to anwser the question.

    :wavey:
     
  7. Dinky

    Dinky Numpty

    9,706
    17
    May 22, 2003
  8. tous

    tous GET A ROPE!

    30,789
    26,128
    Jan 7, 2001
    Plano, Texas, Republic of
    Uh, not yes.

    Both objects are moving relative to each other. Whichever way you go on the aircraft, you are moving 2 kph and the energy needed is the same, just as it would be if the aircraft were sitting on the ground.

    Consider the same aircraft. If you jump up in the air, does the plane move out from under you at 965 kph and smash you into the bulkhead?

    Note that if you are standing at the North or South Pole, you can walk around the world in about ten steps. :supergrin:
     
  9. HandyMan Hugh

    HandyMan Hugh NRA Life Member

    3,048
    76
    May 17, 2002
    Hallstead, PA
    And a little Cowbell too. :supergrin::supergrin:
     
  10. tous

    tous GET A ROPE!

    30,789
    26,128
    Jan 7, 2001
    Plano, Texas, Republic of
  11. engineer151515

    engineer151515

    14,156
    239
    Nov 3, 2003
    For Goodness sake, DO NOT throw a treadmill into this analysis.
     
  12. Dinky

    Dinky Numpty

    9,706
    17
    May 22, 2003


    Most of the time it is my fault butt not this time....:whistling:
     
  13. Dinky

    Dinky Numpty

    9,706
    17
    May 22, 2003


    OK, standing on a treadmill with a 10mm :faint:
     
  14. tous

    tous GET A ROPE!

    30,789
    26,128
    Jan 7, 2001
    Plano, Texas, Republic of
    Is the treadmill on the rotational axis of the earth?
    Is the 10mm cartidge a Buffalo Bore product or a wimpy range round?
    Is the Moon in the seventh house?
    Jupiter aligned with Mars?
     
  15. vkscott

    vkscott Retired USAF

    213
    0
    Feb 13, 2012
    Somewhere in TX
    :rofl: You used ass and tail in the same sentence.
     
  16. tous

    tous GET A ROPE!

    30,789
    26,128
    Jan 7, 2001
    Plano, Texas, Republic of
    It is my great talent. :supergrin:

    I can do little else.

    :wavey:
     
  17. HiddenEyes

    HiddenEyes It can be done

    7,580
    62
    Feb 4, 2002



    So goes the tale of learning thus far assimilated by tous.:whistling:




    Mr. HE:cool: