close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Talk

Why should YOU join our Glock forum?

  • Converse with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Learn about the latest hunting products
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.

Digitizing 35mm slides

Discussion in 'Tech Talk' started by Ragin Cajun, Oct 19, 2004.

  1. I have a bunch of older 35mm slides. I would like to digitize some of them. I notice Costco.com has the following:

    http://www.costco.com/Browse/Product.aspx?prodid=10016148&whse=BC&topnav=&cat=

    Pacific Image PrimeFilm 35mm Film & Slide Scanner 1800U
    Adobe Photoshop Album 1.0 Software for Windows included

    35 mm film and slide scanner: scans slides and negatives
    Linear array color CCD
    36 bits per pixel color mode
    12-bit per pixel grayscale mode
    Optical resolution: 1800 dpi
    (or 4.2 million pixels for a 35mm x 24mm image)
    Maximum resolution: 19200 x 19200 dpi
    (software enhanced)
    Light source: Cold cathode fluorescent lamp
    Scanning buffer: 512 K byte
    Preview speed: approximately 10 seconds for color
    Scanning speed: approximately 35 seconds
    Maximum scanning area: 36mm x 24mm
    USB interface
    Microsoft XP® compatible
    Microsoft ME compatible
    Included software: Adobe Photoshop Album 1.0; Pacific Image CyberView; TWAIN-compliant driver for PC; plug-in for Mac; Presto Pagemanager (with image folio); Mr. Photo (with photo album)
    Package includes: Film scanner, USB cable, power adaptor, driver, user's manual, warranty card and quick installation guide
    Dimensions: 10.55" x 6.54" x 2.60"
    Weight: 1.65 lbs.

    $99.99 Shipping & Handling included

    Item # 423427


    Has anybody used this unit? How big are the files? My Olympus 3.2 mega pixle files are generally under 500K each and print very well at 8X10.


    I'm not looking to do anything fancy, just the basics. $99 to my door sure is looking good. I don't think I need the 3600 dpi ones.

    Thanks in advance.
     
  2. greenlead

    greenlead

    326
    0
    Jul 30, 2004
    NE Indiana
    Many scanners have 35mm adapters. Shop around.
     


  3. "Bunch" would imply using an automated scanner. I purchased the DIMAGE Scanner III for my dad for Xmas 03. Works great, just a little more expensive, but the time saved (it scans a negative strip or multiple slides in a holder) vice manual scanning is a killer. As far as size, depends on resolution and compression.

    If your slides or negatives were faster than 100, 3600 dpi is probably to high, since there is noise. Especially 400 and 800 (but those would be for negatives). Ektachrome 100 and Kodachrome 64 (more likely since you say older) are fairly fine grain and can benefit from higher resolution.

    -ken
     
  4. Texas T

    Texas T TX expatriate CLM

    1,935
    0
    Jan 25, 2000
    W7YBY
    Ken, most of my dad's slides are from the 50's and 60's and they say Kodachrome (no mention of 64) on the slides themselves. To do the same thing that Ragin is doing are you suggesting that the 3600dpi will give me better results? Thanks


    T
     
  5. What about file size? In looking at the specs of various slide scanners the file sizes appear to be HUGE compared to the file size used my my digital camera. What gives???

    BTW, I have many slides but will only digitize some.
     
  6. hwyhobo

    hwyhobo

    1,426
    0
    Jun 3, 2003
    Silicon Valley
    There is no magic when comes to file sizes. Scanned image size = DPI * SurfaceArea_in_Square_Inches * 12_bit_depth. Your camera is probably set to produce highly compressed (in a lossy format) jpeg images, perhaps in lower than high quality.

    The good news is, after you process your image in a lossles, high quality format, you can save for the web display in jpeg. Keep the large lossles images for the future. Blank CDs are not exactly expensive these days.
     
  7. That is fairly old, I haven't scanned those, but I know that the older films were grainier. Kodachrome 64 (some slower) is the most common slides my dad used in the 70s, 80s. Print film negative scans of 60's film was ok at high resolution, but IMO should be saved at higher compression as they didn't have near the quality (grain and contrasting) as todays films.

    If you have really good quality slides, then high res, with low compression is worthwhile. Buy a DVD burner.

    -ken
     
  8. small calculation error

    actually, RAW size(KB) = dpi * area * color_bit_depth * scan_colors / 8

    you get at least 3 scan_colors (R/G/B).

    -k