close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Desperation: Obama Surrogate Calls to Make Voting Mandatory

Discussion in 'Political Issues' started by DOC44, Jun 21, 2012.


  1. DOC44

    DOC44
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2004
    15,553
    4,473
    Location:
    in my recliner
  2. Glock30Eric

    Glock30Eric
    Expand Collapse
    .45 ACP

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2011
    3,353
    0
    Location:
    Southern Maryland
    Wow, just wow.


    Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine
     

  3. Brucev

    Brucev
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2009
    9,189
    5
    Re: OP. This comes as no surprise. Originally the franchise only pertained to property owners. It's near universal extension incorporated many citizens into the electoral process whose participation was never envisioned or desired by the founding fathers. Given that there is nothing in the Constitution to preclude it, why would requiring qualified citizens to participate in the electoral process be problematic?
     
  4. samurairabbi

    samurairabbi
    Expand Collapse
    Dungeon Schmuck

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 1998
    5,894
    39
    Location:
    Indianapolis, IN
    They leave out the principal question: if someone does NOT vote, what is the penalty inflicted for not voting?
     
  5. DOC44

    DOC44
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2004
    15,553
    4,473
    Location:
    in my recliner
    Vote or Die, MFer

    Intimidation

    Doc44
     
  6. Brucev

    Brucev
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2009
    9,189
    5
    All men upon reaching age 18 are required to register with the Selective Service. That is the law. Other than the squatter and a few other criminals, most if not all men comply. Yet the COTUS does not authorize a draft. Why would requiring citizens to vote be any different? If some find it objectionable, the same has been true of the draft. Yet we were all told that we had to comply with the law as it was in the national interest for us to all be registered so that we could be drafted to protect the world from communism. Why should being required by law to exercise ones franchise be seen any differently that being required to give up several years of your life in military service to act as rental soldiers for old europe and various middle eastern client states?
     
  7. samurairabbi

    samurairabbi
    Expand Collapse
    Dungeon Schmuck

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 1998
    5,894
    39
    Location:
    Indianapolis, IN
    Now THAT election would be eventful! Inner city homeboys and rural rednecks finally agreeing on something!

    I might even vote early to fulfill my civic duty, and then join the opposition hijinks afterwards!
     
  8. samurairabbi

    samurairabbi
    Expand Collapse
    Dungeon Schmuck

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 1998
    5,894
    39
    Location:
    Indianapolis, IN
    Because registering for the draft has been ruled by the US Supreme Court to have a valid constitutional aspect, namely the war powers granted to Congress by the Constitution. Mandatory voting does not have such a constitutional basis.
     
    #8 samurairabbi, Jun 21, 2012
    Last edited: Jun 21, 2012
  9. stevelyn

    stevelyn
    Expand Collapse
    NRA Life Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2005
    11,102
    2,987
    Location:
    Fairbanksan in Aleutian Hell
    He can deploy the NBPP as enforcers. They already have experience and expertise in the voter intimidation field anyway.
     
  10. samurairabbi

    samurairabbi
    Expand Collapse
    Dungeon Schmuck

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 1998
    5,894
    39
    Location:
    Indianapolis, IN
    You'll get that voting lever into my hands when you force it into my cold dead fingers!
     
  11. QNman

    QNman
    Expand Collapse
    resU deretsigeR
    Silver Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2005
    9,897
    360
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO
    Folks, if you didn't take the time to watch the Southpark YouTube video at the bottom of this article... you should. It is far more entertaining and, frankly,says more than the article about the silliness of this persons "campaign".
     
  12. janice6

    janice6
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    30,399
    10,174
    Location:
    minnesota
    I suppose "they" will come with guns to escort us to the voting booth, to force our liberty upon us.

    Pathetic.


    Some people have nothing. What is the pressure you bring to bear on them to make them comply? If you have nothing to lose, then force is the default.
     
  13. JBnTX

    JBnTX
    Expand Collapse
    Texas

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2008
    19,576
    3,632
    Location:
    Texas
    One more reason why Obama MUST be defeated.

    :steamed:
     
  14. CitizenOfDreams

    CitizenOfDreams
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2009
    8,111
    5
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    I wonder what else will become mandatory in this country by the end of Obama's second term?
     
  15. walt cowan

    walt cowan
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2005
    10,603
    1,213
    Location:
    Absurdistan
    this is why the ussr had a 99% turn out. hard to say your the serve the people's will when less than 40% voted in a election.
     
  16. HexHead

    HexHead
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2009
    4,815
    0
    It will be the New Black Panthers that show up at your door to escort you to the polls.
     
  17. walt cowan

    walt cowan
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2005
    10,603
    1,213
    Location:
    Absurdistan
    we'er dibold. leave the voting to us.
     
  18. nursetim

    nursetim
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2006
    13,679
    6,010
    Location:
    liberalville N. M.
    I would go a step further, mandatory voting, EXCEPT those recieving government benefits. I could go for that.
     
  19. Brucev

    Brucev
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2009
    9,189
    5
    Given that the little boys and girls in the black robes have decided that corporations are persons and that money is speech, it would not be a problem for that same bunch to find a Constitutional shred upon which to predicate a basis for requiring citizens to vote. Given that the ruling on corporate personhood and money as speech were very much driven to serve a particular political interest, there would be no legitimate basis to argue that requiring all citizens to vote was not also perfectly in the national interest.
     
  20. Brucev

    Brucev
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2009
    9,189
    5
    The process of enforcement would not be difficult. Just look at how successful have been the efforts of conservatives to win the drug war.

    Forcing liberty? No. Requiring participation in the elective process. The willingness of the citizen is respected exactly as in requiring registration for and compliance with the draft.