close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Talk

Why should YOU join our Glock forum?

  • Converse with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Learn about the latest hunting products
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.

Defenseless Children

Discussion in 'Indiana Glockers' started by IPDBrad, Mar 13, 2007.

  1. State cites child-care owner carrying gun


    By Robert Annis
    Robert.Annis@Topics.com

    CARMEL, Ind. -- The state's Family and Social Services Administration cited the co-owner of a local child day-care center with carrying a concealed firearm at the facility.


    Richard Lyday, co-owner of Heartland Hall Child Development Center, 11540 N. Meridian St., told FSSA investigators that he carried the weapon for personal protection and to provide security for the children.

    Approximately 240 children are enrolled in the day-care program at Heartland Hall, according to Lyday.
    Heartland Hall is licensed by the FSSA as a child day-care center, said Dennis Rosebrough, FSSA communications director.

    The firearm citation carries no fine or punishment, he said. However, day-care centers must correct issues revealed in citations or face the possiblity of closure.
    Rosebrough said it was the first instance that he's aware of where an Indiana child-care center owner or employee received a citation for carrying a gun at a day-care center.

    After receiving the citation Feb. 2, Lyday immediately removed the firearm from the center, according to state documents. Lyday, a retired information systems executive, works full-time at Heartland Hall with his co-owner wife, Sally Lyday.

    "The sole reason I have possessed a firearm is for the protection of the children who are entrusted to us everyday," Richard Lyday said in an e-mail.

    "We have been fortunate to have maintained an excellent and stable clientele," he said. "Having said that, it is conceivable, although unlikely, that an individual could present himself who could pose a risk for the children. Before possessing a gun on the premises, I satisfied myself that I am within my rights to carry a gun on school property . . ."

    Lyday has a valid permit for the gun, said Lori DeWeese, licensing consultant for FSSA.
    Joyce McComiskey, business manager at Peter Rabbit Nursery School in Carmel, said firearms are not allowed at state-licensed preschools. She said most reputable facilities provide adequate security without staff members carrying weapons.

    "It's dangerous and against state code," she said.
    Edward Sehrager, Lyday's attorney, said in a letter to FSSA that his client was within his rights to have a gun on the premises, citing Indiana code pertaining to schools.

    FSSA countered that Heartland Hall is not licensed as a school, but as a child day-care center. Indiana law prohibits the use or possession of firearms at a child-care center unless the person is required to as a condition of employment, Rosebrough said.
    Sehrager and FSSA attorneys are deliberating whether Lyday's job description includes acting as a security guard, Rosebrough said.
    "It's a serious issue we're giving a lot of attention to," he said. "We want to make sure our licensed centers are safe for children."

    Rosebrough said FSSA field inspectors could perform surprise inspections of Heartland Hall to ensure Lyday is complying with the order not to carry a firearm.
     
  2. sjstill

    sjstill Guest

    Won't somebody please think of the children.....


    Looks like he was. Good for him, I sez.
     


  3. usaf207cwf

    usaf207cwf

    56
    0
    Sep 29, 2005
    Is the FSSA ready to provide it's own security guard, since it is depriving this business of any effective security?

    Nope.

    Idiots...
     
  4. Harlequin

    Harlequin I need a weapon

    455
    0
    Sep 19, 2003
    East Central Indiana
    Morons on a power trip. Sounds just like the guvmint to me. Sounds like he just needs to modify his job description a bit and he's good to go.
     
  5. MikeG23

    MikeG23

    393
    0
    Dec 16, 2003
    Indiana
    That sentence doesn't sound right at all. The words most and adequate don't belong in such a bold proclamation.
     
  6. KSFreeman

    KSFreeman Broken Member

    824
    0
    Jul 10, 2001
    Lafayette, Indiana
    All of more reason to exempted LTCH holders from the govnernmentally-approved slaughter pen of "no guns in school" statute!
     
  7. fire1035

    fire1035

    79
    0
    Mar 5, 2007
    Speedway, IN
    What a load of BS. I've often wondered what would happen if someone decided to wander into the place where my kid goes.
     
  8. mpholic

    mpholic

    323
    0
    Nov 1, 2004
    Where's the statute that states no guns in Day care?

    I do remember reading no guns in school but I also remember security personnel authorized by the school administration are exempt.

    I take it from reading the article there are seperate regulations governing licensed day cares.
     
  9. txgho1911

    txgho1911

    95
    0
    Jan 1, 2006
    Indianapolis
    This is another example of state agencies making administrative rules about personal weapons outside of the legislative process. The current pre-emption in the law has no teeth for any state administrative body.
    DNR on SD handguns in the field and on property.
    Health dept offices with the gun busters sign.
     
  10. boilergonzo

    boilergonzo

    1,557
    130
    Mar 31, 2004
    Indiana
    Is the NRA aware of this? They may be willing to lend this man a hand with the legal aspects (lawyers, etc.).
     
  11. txgho1911

    txgho1911

    95
    0
    Jan 1, 2006
    Indianapolis
    I do not think assistance is needed. This was a slap on the wrist without penalty.
    I just searched several areas of Indiana Code andthe administrative rules and did not find anything relating to this.
     
  12. minuteman32

    minuteman32 NRA & GOA Life

    606
    0
    Aug 20, 2004
    Central IN.
    I wassurprised that the Hamilton Co. Persecutor hasn't charge this fellow! The same Persecutor who said it was "illegal to have a gun w/in 1000' of my church, because there is 'sunday school'!"

    I was thinking if he is charged, it could be a good case to have the law declared unconstitutional. You know, the "People have a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of themself & the State of IN"(Section 1, article 32, IN Constitution) & all!
     
  13. mpholic

    mpholic

    323
    0
    Nov 1, 2004
    :rofl: You've got to be kidding. I had not heard that. Did he really think people would take that serious?
     
  14. singlestacksig

    singlestacksig

    35
    0
    May 13, 2006
    indiana

    IC 35-47-9-1
    Exemptions from chapter
    35-47-9-1 Sec. 1. This chapter does not apply to the following:
    (1) A:
    (A) federal;
    (B) state; or
    (C) local;
    law enforcement officer.
    (2) A person who has been employed or authorized by:
    (A) a school; or
    (B) another person who owns or operates property being used by a school for a school function;
    to act as a security guard, perform or participate in a school function, or participate in any other activity authorized by a school.
    (3) A person who:
    (A) may legally possess a firearm; and
    (B) possesses the firearm in a motor vehicle that is being operated by the person to transport another person to or from a school or a school function.
    As added by P.L.140-1994, SEC.11.


    IC 35-47-9-2



    THis must be some FSSA Admin thing, the guy was the owner, he can authorize him self..
     
  15. mpholic

    mpholic

    323
    0
    Nov 1, 2004
    The above rules apply to schools. The day care is not considered a school.

    FSSA countered that Heartland Hall is not licensed as a school, but as a child day-care center. Indiana law prohibits the use or possession of firearms at a child-care center unless the person is required to as a condition of employment

    Other than FSSA administrative rules I don't see any legislation against this. I'm not a lawyer and don't pretend to be I just want to understand whether this is really legal or just governmental pressure with no law to back up it up.
     
  16. singlestacksig

    singlestacksig

    35
    0
    May 13, 2006
    indiana
    See D 3 ..


    IC 35-41-1-24.7


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    "School property" defined
    35-41-1-24.7 Sec. 24.7. "School property" means the following:
    (1) A building or other structure owned or rented by:
    (A) a school corporation;
    (B) an entity that is required to be licensed under IC 12-17.2 or IC 31-27;
    (C) a private school that is not supported and maintained by funds realized from the imposition of a tax on property, income, or sales; or
    (D) a federal, state, local, or nonprofit program or service operated to serve, assist, or otherwise benefit children who are at least three (3) years of age and not yet enrolled in kindergarten, including the following:
    (i) A Head Start program under 42 U.S.C. 9831 et seq.
    (ii) A special education preschool program.
    (iii) A developmental child care program for preschool children.
    (2) The grounds adjacent to and owned or rented in common with a building or other structure described in subdivision (1).
    As added by P.L.296-1987, SEC.4. Amended by P.L.34-1991, SEC.27; P.L.9-1991, SEC.95; P.L.2-1992, SEC.880; P.L.81-1992, SEC.38; P.L.1-1993, SEC.240; P.L.160-1994, SEC.1; P.L.1-2005, SEC.227; P.L.145-2006, SEC.370.
     
  17. minuteman32

    minuteman32 NRA & GOA Life

    606
    0
    Aug 20, 2004
    Central IN.
    Regardless of whose definition of "school" you choose to believe, it is a FELONY to have any kind of gun on any number of places that have kids located there! There is no misdemenor charge that it can be lowered to.

    Get & read, "Indiana Handgun Law". It will infuriate you to find out all of the places that you can NOT take your gun into!!!
    I was so mad I couldn't see straight after reading it the 1st time!

    That is why we need to push for full exemption from ANY off limits places for LTC holders (@ least!).

    (Okay, okay, maybe a few aren't a bad idea. Someplace like inside a prison, inside a court ROOM ... not court HOUSE, & then, only if YOU are involved in that particular case, might be okay, but nothing more.)
     
  18. mpholic

    mpholic

    323
    0
    Nov 1, 2004
    That is something I am probably overdue in accomplishing.

    Where can I get a copy?

    Thank You
     
  19. minuteman32

    minuteman32 NRA & GOA Life

    606
    0
    Aug 20, 2004
    Central IN.
    If you're going to the 1500 this weekend, the author will be there selling them (I should be @ the table next to his, making ear plugs).
    Or, you could try; http://www.indianahandgunlaw.com/
    I usually have some copies @ my UT LTC classes, as well.:thumbsup:
     
  20. singlestacksig

    singlestacksig

    35
    0
    May 13, 2006
    indiana

    Thats why I think it was an Administrative rule and not a LAw that the guy was cited for..
    If it was a Law, then it would be the school ban, and he should be exempt from that..