close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

CZ 97BD vs 1911

Discussion in '1911 Forums' started by Fedor, May 29, 2011.


  1. Fedor

    Fedor
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    1,529
    3
    Location:
    Kansas
    I have a CZ 97BD that is an absolute tack driver. The price of the CZ was $735.00

    How much will I need to spend on a 1911 that will match the accuracy of the CZ ?
     

    Wanna kill these ads? We can help!
  2. Quack

    Quack
    Expand Collapse
    Rent this space

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2002
    9,987
    5
    Location:
    NE Ohio
    $600...
     

  3. awpk03s

    awpk03s
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    1,472
    0
    Location:
    Ohio
    I've always had an interest in the CZ 97 pistols... Aren't they pretty fat in the grip?
     
  4. Fedor

    Fedor
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    1,529
    3
    Location:
    Kansas
    No, it is very comparable to a Beretta 92FS. I like it a lot.

    One big reason I hesitate about getting another 1911, is because the grip feels too small and narrow.

    My favorite grip is my Sig P220, it feels like it was custom built for my hand.
     
    #4 Fedor, May 29, 2011
    Last edited: May 29, 2011
  5. Hokie1911

    Hokie1911
    Expand Collapse
    >

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2003
    9,712
    1
    Location:
    NE Ohio
    That was my first impression when I handled Quack's new CZ at the range last week. She's a fat girl.
     
  6. MD357

    MD357
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2008
    4,124
    11
    Just about any 1911 should be AS accurate if not more. CZs are great guns but those were too big and bulky for me. I'd never pay $700 for one either, you can find those all day long for $500ish around here.
     
  7. Fedor

    Fedor
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    1,529
    3
    Location:
    Kansas
    A 97BD with night sights for $500.00? Where is around here?
     
  8. MD357

    MD357
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2008
    4,124
    11
    That's not what I said.... and around here is close. Either way, a reasonably well built 1911 will out perform that particular gun. The DA is atrocious on those things.
     
  9. Berto

    Berto
    Expand Collapse
    woo woo

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2003
    24,044
    1,926
    Location:
    WA
    The '97 is definitely a gun for big hands, but they are shooters.
    That said, my Kimber Cust II is easily a match for the CZ 97 I had, and has a better SA trigger.....the DA trigger was useless to me.
    The 97 was also 'flippier' than the Kimber.
    I liked the 97, even got Hakan to make a set of grip panels for it...but I like the 1911 better. It's as accurate, easier to control and more reliable. CZ's grace is in their 9mm pistols, IMO.
     
  10. Fedor

    Fedor
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    1,529
    3
    Location:
    Kansas
    There is nothing wrong with the SA trigger pull on my 97BD.
     
  11. carguy2244

    carguy2244
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2009
    848
    7
    CZs are extremely accurate. In capable hands, certainly capable of sub 2 inch groups at 25 yards.
    What $600 1911 is capable of that?
     
  12. Cerebrus

    Cerebrus
    Expand Collapse
    Guest

    STI Spartan comes to mind...:wavey:
     
  13. carguy2244

    carguy2244
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2009
    848
    7
    Good call.
     
  14. Quack

    Quack
    Expand Collapse
    Rent this space

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2002
    9,987
    5
    Location:
    NE Ohio
    Wiley Clapp showed that the R1 can do it ;)
     
  15. Fedor

    Fedor
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    1,529
    3
    Location:
    Kansas
    A plastic main spring housing and a plastic Trigger.

    No Thanks.
     
  16. Berto

    Berto
    Expand Collapse
    woo woo

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2003
    24,044
    1,926
    Location:
    WA
    Never said there was. My 97 had a good SA pull with a some stacking where the sear disengaged and the hammer would roll back slightly. The Kimber's is only a little lighter but more crisp. About 400% quicker reset too.
    I shot some very good 25yrd groups with it, but I also got more 4+1 groups from it than any other gun I've had.
    I also didn't like the super thin section of metal between the spring tunnel and bbl bushing, which cracked on a number of guns...hopefully they fixed that.
     
    #16 Berto, May 29, 2011
    Last edited: May 29, 2011
  17. Cerebrus

    Cerebrus
    Expand Collapse
    Guest

    Colt, Kimber, as well as STI use plastic for the MSH.. its really a non issue imo..:dunno:
     
  18. Berto

    Berto
    Expand Collapse
    woo woo

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2003
    24,044
    1,926
    Location:
    WA
    Just about any of the less expensive 1911's tested on the Gunblast website will shoot under 2"
    The Regency (Turkish)
    Cimmarron (Italian?)
    Rem R1
    Ruger SP1911 (should retail in the $600 range)

    I'd expect the CZ97 would also. Mine did with Blazer alum 230gr, of all things.
     
  19. bac1023

    bac1023
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2004
    101,819
    2,433
    Location:
    PA
    Less than that, actually.
     
  20. bac1023

    bac1023
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2004
    101,819
    2,433
    Location:
    PA

    I would wager that just about any modern enhanced 1911 will outshoot a CZ 97.

    The STI Spartan should have no trouble doing that, actually, and its less money.







    .
     
    #20 bac1023, May 29, 2011
    Last edited: May 29, 2011