close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Talk

Why should YOU join our Glock forum?

  • Converse with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Learn about the latest hunting products
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.

Corbon DPX 45 +P 185 Grain Short Barrel Gel Test

Discussion in 'Caliber Corner' started by Ljutic, Mar 14, 2013.

  1. SCmasterblaster

    SCmasterblaster Millennium Member

    18,106
    612
    Sep 24, 1999
    Hartford, Vermont
    And I agree with you, for lead has far more density than copper.
     
  2. WinterWizard

    WinterWizard

    1,417
    5
    Jan 17, 2012
    I think Tiro meant that the copper bullet must be a little longer in order to equal 185gr because of the density of lead vs. copper. So it does, in fact, have slightly more mass. But the mass is not where it will make a difference, in my opinion. The diameter and weight is the same (.451" and 185gr).

    And I don't buy the whole "copper penetrates better" thing, at least not in handgun rounds. IMO, that is a bullet design factor, not bullet material. A lead or copper bullet will pass through assuming no expansion. It's the bullet shape, design and nature of expansion (combined with weight and velocity) that determine penetration.

    If copper handgun bullets were so much better, then why aren't more LE agencies using them? And why do only a few ammo companies make them?

    It's marketing, guys. Convince people that something is better, even if only slightly, and they will pay more for it, even if that product doesn't offer any real advantage. There is no truth in advertising.

    But JMO. To each their own.
     

    Last edited: Mar 16, 2013

  3. happyguy

    happyguy Man, I'm Pretty

    10% Ballistic Gelatin Tests for:
    Corbon .45 ACP 185gr. +p DPX

    Testing Platform:
    S&W 2 ½” Snub

    Barrier:
    4 Layers of Denim

    TEST RESULTS:

    Round # 1:
    Penetration: 13.875"
    Recovered Weight: 182.7 gr.
    Expansion*: .824 cal.


    * Expansion measured at widest point.


    10% Ballistic Gelatin Tests for:
    Corbon .45 ACP 185gr. +p DPX

    Testing Platform:
    Glock 21

    Barrier:
    2 Layers of 16 gauge steel

    TEST RESULTS:

    Round # 1:
    Penetration: 15.75"
    Recovered Weight: 184.9 gr.
    Expansion*: .551 cal.


    * Expansion measured at widest point.

    It's a different different gun and a different day but it is what it is. (copper corbon 185)

    FYI DPX was the only round that penetrated two layers of 16 gauge steel.

    Also: http://www.ar15.com/ammo/project/Se...Documents/HandgunBulletchartaspicturerev3.jpg

    Make up your own mind.

    Regards,
    Comrade Happyguy :)
     
    Last edited: Mar 16, 2013
  4. jhaynes

    jhaynes

    14
    0
    May 14, 2012
    Indiana
    10" may not sound like alot of penetration, but I would rather my bullet stay in the bad guy than pass through and hit something or someone behind him. That said I still like heavier bullets. I have not tried 230 grain in a short barrel gun to see how much velocity they drop.
     
  5. Tiro Fijo

    Tiro Fijo

    6,281
    7
    May 31, 2011
    Bingo.



    Simple reason as I stated earlier: cost.
     
  6. WinterWizard

    WinterWizard

    1,417
    5
    Jan 17, 2012
    You may be right, but I am not convinced that is the sole reason.
     
  7. fredj338

    fredj338

    21,708
    925
    Dec 22, 2004
    so.cal.
    Uhh, mass vs weight 185gr is 185gr. The length of the bullet has little to do with momentum. A longer for wt monometal bullet will give you slightly higher SD as it expands because it rarely loses wt & also rarely over expands. IMO, not offering much over a well designed bonded lead core bullet. They are also brutally expensive.
     
    Last edited: Mar 17, 2013
  8. Tiro Fijo

    Tiro Fijo

    6,281
    7
    May 31, 2011

    Until one has to shoot through steel (car/truck doors), then it beats the bonded handgun bullet. Granted, for the average layman this is of little consequence, (as well bonded bullets) but for LE it's a trump card.

    Does it warrant the cost? In some scenarios where one needs the absolute maximum potential in a handgun round involving hard barriers, e.g., Highway Patrolmen. Other than that, economy wins as it is as you said, "brutally expensive".
     
  9. digilo

    digilo

    307
    0
    Apr 27, 2010
    texas
    +1. He's spewing nonsense again.

    "solid copper bullets have more mass."
     
  10. fredj338

    fredj338

    21,708
    925
    Dec 22, 2004
    so.cal.
    Sort of. If mass as a unit of weight, they have the same weight. If total projectile size not counting weight, the copper bullt is longer. So it depends on how you are defining mass. A pound of feathers or a pound of lead, which has more mass? Bulk or mass, is it semantics? To me mass means weight, not bulk, pound of feathers or pound of lead?:dunno:
     
    Last edited: Mar 17, 2013
  11. WinterWizard

    WinterWizard

    1,417
    5
    Jan 17, 2012
    No definition of mass I've ever seen or have been taught in school implies weight. Mass refers the the size of something, or the area it takes up. I don't think weight has anything to do with it.
     
  12. Little Joe

    Little Joe

    7,227
    1,138
    Dec 28, 2007
    At The Ready
  13. Tiro Fijo

    Tiro Fijo

    6,281
    7
    May 31, 2011

    Bingo again.


    For the others who shot pool during science class, get educated:

    Mass is a measure of how much matter something contains.

    Weight is a measure of how strongly gravity pulls downwards.

    :wavey:
     
  14. ChallengerSRT

    ChallengerSRT

    381
    21
    Jan 22, 2013
    I guess I'm missing the point of this thread completely. I am well aware of what all of the definitions involved here mean. What I stated was that two bullets the same size or MASS put side by side, one solid copper, the other solid lead, will have a drastic difference in density (weight/unit volume). Take that difference in density, propel it at the same speed down range, and I'd expect the much heavier round to pack more punch.
    If both bullets are the same grain, then I agree, the copper one would have to be considerably longer. What effect that has on anything, I've no clue. For the difference in cost, however, I'd rather pump a few rounds of lead towards the target for the price of one copper round. If the sky's the limit for cost, I'd go with titanium.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=lLX33bAVXuU
     
  15. WinterWizard

    WinterWizard

    1,417
    5
    Jan 17, 2012
    I agree. This thread has gotten a little dumb at this point. But hey, it's the Caliber Corner. Threads always get dumb. Which is why I read them often.
     
  16. NEOH212

    NEOH212 Diesel Girl

    8,983
    11
    Mar 25, 2008
    North East Ohio
    45 = 230 grain and nothing else. :cool:


    Lighter bullets are for smaller calibers. Putting a lighter bullet in your .45 is like buying a Mustang with a V6. :faint:
     
  17. SCmasterblaster

    SCmasterblaster Millennium Member

    18,106
    612
    Sep 24, 1999
    Hartford, Vermont