close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Cook Cty States Attorney office says not they aren't bound by Federal Court

Discussion in 'Gun-Control Issues' started by WarCry, Feb 19, 2013.


  1. WarCry

    WarCry
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2009
    9,577
    1,075
    Location:
    IL, on the banks of the Muddy River
    No links at the moment, it's happening live in the Judiciary Committee hearings on CCW in Springfield.

    A representative from the Cook County States Attorney's office said that ONLY the Illinois Supreme Court has the authority to declare state laws unconstitutional. He claimed that the 7th Circuit can only issue an "advisory opinion" and is not binding. He went on to declare that, if no legislation was passed and the deadline passed, the Cook County States Attorney would continue to prosecuted under the barred law.

    The first representative to speak to the issue was one of the hard-core anti-gun Chicago Democrats. He warned the States Attorney's office to tread very, VERY carefully on declaring that they won't be bound by Federal courts.

    This could turn into a MUCH bigger fight than just concealed carry.
     

    Wanna kill these ads? We can help!
  2. Happypuppy

    Happypuppy
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2012
    735
    0
    Location:
    North Puget Sound, WA
    Good luck with that. In the early 60s some states tried that argument about busing. They Feds told them to comply or they would send troops. Then Gov. Wallace complied
     

  3. WarCry

    WarCry
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2009
    9,577
    1,075
    Location:
    IL, on the banks of the Muddy River
    Still no transcript located. Here's a video of the from the entire hearing. The Cook County State's Attorney rep starts at 2:16:25.

    A few quotes:
    "The federal decision in Moore vs Madigan is NOT currently the law in Illinois"

    Reference to 2 IL Supreme Court rulings (I think I missed the proper names, can't find the cases right off the bat)

    General rules is that the opinions of federal and circuit courts are not binding on state courts - Chicago v Rothman (sp?)

    Until the US Supreme Court rules, state courts are not precluded from exercising their own judgement on the constitutionality of laws. Lower federal courts have no appellate jurisdiction over state courts decisions People vs Harris


    It's a very interesting stance they're taking, and I think it says it all that the representatives that are ADAMANTLY against CCW and any gun rights are some of the voices telling this guy "Hold up, wait, what??"
     
    #3 WarCry, Feb 19, 2013
    Last edited: Feb 19, 2013
  4. Gunnut 45/454

    Gunnut 45/454
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2002
    12,129
    9
    Happypuppy
    Well under a normal Presidencey that might be the case -but since we have the most Anti -COTUS admin , Anti 2nd Amendment admin you will not see any Federal action! Holder will not act! In fact I'd say he'd go against the Federal court!:steamed:
     
    #4 Gunnut 45/454, Feb 19, 2013
    Last edited: Feb 19, 2013
  5. Dawolf

    Dawolf
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2010
    1,147
    1
    Location:
    Arizona
    Lift leg, and pee on the constitution once again in Chi-commie-cago.
     
  6. jpa

    jpa
    Expand Collapse
    CLM

    Joined:
    May 28, 2001
    7,988
    90
    Location:
    Las Vegas NV
    Did they take the video down? Your link is missing.
     
  7. Jakestir

    Jakestir
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2013
    1,319
    64
    Location:
    North central IL
  8. TK-421

    TK-421
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2012
    10,076
    717
    Location:
    Pflugerville, TX
    Doesn't surprise me. If other states can say they're not bound by federal law, and will legalize pot, or will not obey a federal assault weapons ban, why can't a county do the opposite, and say they'll go by the laws that are already on the books, instead of letting those laws be destroyed?
     
  9. WarCry

    WarCry
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2009
    9,577
    1,075
    Location:
    IL, on the banks of the Muddy River
    No, that would be my fault for being stupid and in a rush to get it posted yesterday:
    http://new.livestream.com/blueroomstream/events/1862841


    Sorry about that...


    Note: I was looking at this, and it looks like they've edited the video, so the time-marks may be off a bit.
     
    #9 WarCry, Feb 20, 2013
    Last edited: Feb 20, 2013
  10. Libertarian71

    Libertarian71
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2013
    151
    9
    Location:
    Soviet Socialist Republic of California
    I am a lawyer, licensed in Illinois and California. The Cook County State's Attorney is wrong. It is remarkable he passed the bar exam.
     
  11. Gunnut 45/454

    Gunnut 45/454
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2002
    12,129
    9
    Libertarian71
    Well when the crooks run the bar they let anyone who pleases them through! Thugcago has had there system in place since the thirties. Coruption run by the corupt!:faint: