close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Concealing G26

Discussion in 'Carry Issues' started by frontier2011, Dec 20, 2012.


  1. frontier2011

    frontier2011
    Expand Collapse
    Give Me Brass

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2011
    262
    0
    Location:
    East Coast
    #1 frontier2011, Dec 20, 2012
    Last edited: Dec 20, 2012
  2. PaulMason

    PaulMason
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2010
    4,516
    979
  3. jthrelf

    jthrelf
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2012
    436
    0
    Location:
    PA
    I DO NOT CONSENT TO SEARCHES

    very useful words!
     
  4. frontier2011

    frontier2011
    Expand Collapse
    Give Me Brass

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2011
    262
    0
    Location:
    East Coast
    yea, like that would matter......:rofl:
     
  5. Louisville Glocker

    Louisville Glocker
    Expand Collapse
    Urban Redneck

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2010
    2,271
    21
    Location:
    Louisville, KY
    Horribly invasive. I suspect the lawsuit will be successful. Very poor policework.

    But civilians, you should never give up your rights. They had no reason to conduct an invasive search. A Terry frisk, yes, but not body cavities. When asked if you can be searched, say no. The LEO would not be asking for permission unless they need it.

    Unfortunately, (or fortunately, depending on perspective), it is very easy to talk people into giving up their rights. "I'll go easy on you if you let me search, but if you don't it could be a lot of trouble..." etc. "We'll have to bring you downtown, " blah blah blah. People usually give in too easily. You should refuse to be searched. That goes for cars, backpacks, person, etc.
     
  6. glock_collector

    glock_collector
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2011
    851
    0
    If you are gonna put your hand in my bungholiooo, the least you can do is buy me dinner first.
     
  7. frontier2011

    frontier2011
    Expand Collapse
    Give Me Brass

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2011
    262
    0
    Location:
    East Coast
    I think she got the John Travolta special. :rofl::rofl:
     
  8. FriarTuck

    FriarTuck
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2012
    2,862
    3
    I agree. It appeared to me that the police were looking for marijuana, not the most serious offense. And the ladies being searched were being cooperative, and therefore due more respect, IMHO.

    Someone noted the officer apparently didn't change her gloves between searches. Furthermore, she searched the rear first, then the front. This could introduce coliform bacteria near these female urethras, which are shorter and straighter than in the male, rendering a greater risk of developing cystitis, a serious infection.

    Those police, IMHO, need to change their ways.
     
  9. SCmasterblaster

    SCmasterblaster
    Expand Collapse
    Millennium Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 1999
    16,945
    393
    Location:
    Hartford, Vermont
    I just would NOT CONSENT TO THE SEARCH. And sue the daylights out of them if they forced it on me.
     
Loading...
Similar Threads Forum Date
Concealing a Shoulder Holster Carry Issues Feb 5, 2015
G26 Carry Issues Sep 29, 2012
Concealing An AK The Kalashnikov Klub May 30, 2012
Concealing a Hand Cannon Carry Issues Sep 7, 2011
Concealing a 686 The Snubbie Club Sep 21, 2008
Duty Gear at CopsPlus