Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Forum at

Why should YOU join our forums?

  • Reason #1
  • Reason #2
  • Reason #3

Site Description

Coburn: Defunding ObamaCare strategy 'not intellectually honest'

Discussion in 'Political Issues' started by muscogee, Oct 24, 2013.

  1. RussP

    RussP Moderator

    Jan 23, 2003
    Central Virginia
    Good points. Motivating people to look for new employment might be easier if the undesirable employee did not have the benefit package "anchor". That would have been helpful to me a few times over the years.

    Attracting employees to a new venture would be easier if they bring their own insurance plan. Still, many will be under corporate master policies.
    More recently the market is learning to do more with fewer employees.

    Demand will have to increase more dramatically than in the past to entice employers to employ more.

    Otherwise, new companies, either for new products or competitors for existing products will have to come online to hire the employable.
  2. Chronos


    Nov 26, 2007
    Are you aware that the "health care crisis" of the early 1900's was that health car was so cheap and universally available that doctors were afraid of "not getting paid what they deserve?" That ushered in the era of "political solutions," where the government began by effectively giving the AMA a monopoly. There have been many more distortions to the market since then, to the point that it's really a joke to mention the word "free" at this point, but the take home is that even when you think you have customers are over a barrel, providers in a legitimately free market are great at undercutting each other to the point that prices are low and availability is high.

    It's only very recently that you have this meltdown of a heavily regulated and controlled system, with the government artificially propping up the cost of health care (guess who prevents re-importation of drugs, etc).

    Another example of "perfect inelasticity" is food -- if you need it to survive (and you do), you'll pay whatever it costs. According to you, this should completely destroy the effectiveness of the free market. But it doesn't -- instead, we have an obesity problem with poor people, and the ultimate in convenience and low price (fast food) is everywhere.
    Last edited: Oct 26, 2013

  3. Michael Rye

    Michael Rye

    Oct 8, 2012
    Ocare need not be defunded. It will do that on its' own. ACA will not survive without a lot of young, healthy and low risk people signing up. Thus far, they haven't. And they aren't going to, either.
  4. Chronos


    Nov 26, 2007
    Yes -- it's already happening:
  5. Michael Rye

    Michael Rye

    Oct 8, 2012
    In a bass ackwards sort of a way, it's a good thing for the Administration that the website is in such disarray. People can't see the prices! Once they do, there will be even less incentive to sign up. This whole thing has been a turkey from the get go.
  6. If you'd studied markets as you purport to have done I'm sure you'd be able to come up with a few reasons your comparisons break down.

    How many people in 1900 got blood panels, CAT scans, MRI's etc. done as part of their standard battery of tests? Did doctors shell out millions for those machines in 1900?

    Didn't think so...

    Medicine is just a bit different now isn't it. It's more science and technology driven and a bit less voodoo-art.

    As far as food, that's a bit more interesting...

    The market for food is full of substitutes. It's full of tens of thousands of different suppliers. If tomatoes were $10,000 apiece you'd by something else. You wouldn't need to starve because there's hundreds of choices.

    That's the western paradigm.

    In other parts of the world where I've traveled, the local Warlords use food just as you're describing. Africa is a biggie. They withhold food from the locals except their own thugs. This has the effect of creating fanatical loyalty and giving them godlike power.

    So in essence you can see how Market forces break down in various ways using the food analogy.
  7. This hits at the crux of the matter.

    The businesses that made it through the crisis figured out they could do lots more with fewer employees. Lots of those jobs aren't coming back.

    That's why giving people the freedom to go out and try new things like starting businesses without being worried about losing their healthcare is such an important thing. Those guys are the backbone of our economy and they're going to create the new jobs, not the top 1% folks who currently own the bulk of the wealth.

    There's a significant problem with people just sitting around waiting for the plant or the mill to re-open and it's not gonna. Their job is gone forever and them sitting on their couch complaining isn't going to pay off ever.
  8. Chronos


    Nov 26, 2007
    Technology is there to reduce the cost of remaining healthy, not increase it. It is only in an ass-backwards heavily regulated system (full of government-granted monopoloies and enforcement) that the availability of technology causes prices to increase.

    In the food example, you haven't remotely addressed the problem with your theory. You only have a multitude of suppliers and replacements because there is a relatively free market in place. If you go to where food production is carried out by the state, you have starvation and inelasticity and exactly the situation you cite -- politically motivated distribution. The theory would then say that "markets can't work" when in fact they are the only way to make the system work.
  9. janice6

    janice6 Silver Member

    Apr 4, 2006
    Legacy of a politician:

    “I'm a politician, and as a politician I have the prerogative to lie whenever Iwant.”
    Charles Peacock, ex-director of MadisonGuaranty, the Arkansas S&L at center of Whitewatergate.

    Yet this one lectures us on "honesty"........
  10. Chronos


    Nov 26, 2007

    Government Medicare coverage is essentially a scam. Even under current regulations, prices at "cash only" hospitals are 20% of the competition that accepts Medicare patients. But the Medicare co-pay is 20%, so prices become inflated at those hospitals such that out-of-pocket expenses are identical for the patient. So what does the Medicare money end up paying for? Nothing. It's a fraud on a scale so massive it can only be pulled off by you-know-who.
  11. Want to know what I like about Economists? At least the good ones aren't ideologues. They study the data and the established theories and follow where the data and the research leads.

    The statement I bolded is completely false and without merit. Technology in medicine is there to help doctors and other medical professionals figure out what's wrong with people so they can treat them. It's not supposed to lower costs. It's supposed to save lives.

    With regards to the food example, my point stands. Relatively free markets work relatively well. Markets where someone is controlling everything on one side, effectively creating a monopoly aren't free. That's an externality which economists who are worth their weight in chalk dust take into account in their models.

    See, if you have something that's inelastic like healthcare, which you can't get from your garden, like healthcare, and you die without it, like healthcare, then the relatively few conglomerates who control it can charge whatever they want. It's not quite a monopoly but close.

    Interestingly, we've been going that way in our food supply for years. The government subsidies to agribusiness have had the effect of squeezing out the small farms and letting companies like Monsanto dominate the markets. This isn't a good thing for the consumer.

    But the market is still functioning as a market at this point because you can still grow your own food. I get all my produce from farmers markets locally. I either shoot my own meat or get it from local ranchers in the case of beef. My sister has a farm with a bunch of chickens if I need eggs, etc.

    So you see it's a bit different.
  12. series1811

    series1811 Enforcerator. CLM

    Well, we have had the left in charge of the economy for a while now.

    How's that working out for everybody?
  13. At the same time, the doctors maintain a monopoly on the use of that technology. I have to pay a doctor to order a blood workup, pay the doctor to read it to me and pay the doctor to prescribe the needed medications based on that blood test. That's one middle man that could be cut out. I've been having blood work for over ten years. I can read the test as well as anyone. It's not that hard. I know what medication I need because I've been taking that medication for over ten years. Beyond that I know what I've been doing that impacts the results of the blood work. Of course the doctors will argue that most people can't interpret the results. That may be true, but one doesn't need a doctor to do that either. A trained professional could do it or a computer readout could recommend the necessary medication. I see no reason why one couldn't take the results to a pharmacist and have the pharmacist recommend the necessary medication.

    You're on target. We've been moving towards fascism at least since Reagan. Sole Proprietorships now have to operate under the same rules as Halliburton but pay proportionately more taxes and get little to no government subsidies. When Sole Proprietorships can't pay their bills they go under. When Goldman Sachs can't pay its bills it gets a bailout paid for by the Sole Proprietorships and others. Then it can take it's money and invest it overseas, give it to it's executives, or do whatever it wants because the rest of us are going to pick up the tab. Ain't American capitalism (fascism) great.

    In that light, fascists want to "do what's right for the country", the country being the corporations and the government they support. Every time John Boehner starts in wth "do what's right for the country" mantra I think of this.
  14. Try and step away from ideology for a sec and look at voting records.

    Aside from a few key social issues, "left" and "right" vote about 96% or so the same.

    There is no functional difference.

    There is no "Left" and "Right" as it pertains to most issues.

    There's two groups in America. The people who can afford to purchase influence, and those of us who cannot.

    Once you figure this out you'll be much angrier but you'll be angry at the right people for a change.
    Last edited: Oct 27, 2013
  15. G29Reload

    G29Reload Tread Lightly

    Sep 28, 2009
    The only solutions for Obamacare is for it to DIE.

    It does not need to be replaced with ANYTHING.

    There was not that much wrong with healthcare to begin with.
    There will be now.

    Not that O-care has anything to do with healthcare but control.

    It needs to be dumped and its authors strung up or shot.

    Adding government to a situation improves nothing and only makes things worse.

    This entire exercise, half a billion for a failed website, all the rules and regs and economic destruction are completely unnecessary. All the unemployed didnt have to happen except for one narcissists ego and his syncohants.

    I say massive civil disobedience is the only thing left shy of lock and load.
    Last edited: Oct 27, 2013
  16. snerd


    Apr 20, 2007

    Love that guy!! Nothing to add, just wanted to comment on reload's avatar.
    Last edited: Oct 27, 2013
  17. happyguy

    happyguy Man, I'm Pretty

    My favorite Coburn movie was "In Like Flint".

    Happyguy :)
  18. snerd


    Apr 20, 2007
    And my favorite commercial line was, "Schlitz, Light!".
  19. Stubudd


    Nov 4, 2008
    Kennesaw GA

    You guys just don't make any sense, really