close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Charles Krauthammer on AWB

Discussion in 'The Okie Corral' started by norton, Dec 21, 2012.

  1. norton

    norton

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2002
    Messages:
    7,755
    Likes Received:
    2,066
    Location:
    Land of Lincoln, the growing years
    Column in my paper today, CK- a journalist I generally agree with- stated a new AWB will not accomplish anything without confiscation of already existing supplies. That would be yours and mine.
    It seems this issue is more then just liberal vs. conservative. Its urban vs. rural/or fly over country.
    A man like CK, living in DC, can't turn around without running into someone. He lives in a crowded, congested, traffic filled environment. He cannot imagine in his mind there are places where these types of rifles can be safely and responsibly used.
    How many of you regular AR/AK shooters live in urban America?
     
    Last edited: Dec 21, 2012
  2. .264 magnum

    .264 magnum CLM

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2002
    Messages:
    12,993
    Likes Received:
    585
    Location:
    Dallas TX
    I live in Dallas and shoot ARs and AKs often. We have numerous indoor and outdoor ranges close by.
     

  3. Chonny

    Chonny

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2010
    Messages:
    1,881
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Edmond, OK
    He's right you know, the proposed AWB is useless they would have to retroactively ban all that crap to really affect anything at all and at the same time piss off everyone that has never thought of committing a gun related crime.

    People can argue about whether or not they like ARs or not (I dont) but I think that people should have them for sporting purposes.
     
  4. GAFinch

    GAFinch

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2009
    Messages:
    5,937
    Likes Received:
    35
    Location:
    Georgia
    IIRC, he didn't say that he wanted a retroactive ban, just that a AWB was and would be useless without one. He knows good and well that confiscation would be very messy and bloody in this country. He's trying to offer up a dose of reality to people - neither option is viable so seek an alternative to gun control.
     
  5. engineer151515

    engineer151515

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2003
    Messages:
    14,281
    Likes Received:
    452
    I think people should have them for protection of life and rejection of tyranny - which can manifest itself in local, as well as national/international levels.

    Maybe this guy had a point to make:
    " "When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny." - Thomas Jefferson

    IMO: Sporting purposes are nice, but it isn't really the point of ownership.
     
    Last edited: Dec 21, 2012
  6. byf43

    byf43 NRA Life Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2006
    Messages:
    11,880
    Likes Received:
    506
    Location:
    Southern Maryland
    An 'oldie but a goodie' - for your viewing pleasure.
    (Notice Chucky Schumer's expressions.):supergrin:

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1u0Byq5Qis"]Suzanna Gratia Hupp explains meaning of 2nd Amendment! - YouTube[/ame]
     
  7. certifiedfunds

    certifiedfunds Tewwowist

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2008
    Messages:
    55,717
    Likes Received:
    8,090
    Which is why a big federal government that governs everyone the same way is bad.

    Let the people of Chicago ban ARs if they want to. I don't care. Leave me alone.
     
  8. JJohnson

    JJohnson Call me Jeff

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2002
    Messages:
    1,869
    Likes Received:
    22
    Location:
    Des Moines, Iowa
    He's absolutely right. Now when I am pressed to defend why I NEED a "high powered" assault weapon with high capacity clips [sic] I state that I do not need to justify my ownership of said weapons, but that I am taking this time to make a stand. It is clear from the data collected during the previous AW Ban that nothing of significance changed. Should this new AWB ban be passed, it too will be proven worthless the next time some ahole shoots up a shopping mall.

    The left always decries the slippery slope theories. This is one case where it is clear as day that the AWB will not stop anything, and the momentum gained by its passage will certainly lead to further discussions about what to ban, or license next. It is up to us to convince the fudds and the collectors and the rest of the 76,000,000 gun owners out there to get off of their collective asses and help. [/rant]
     
    Last edited: Dec 21, 2012
  9. gommer

    gommer

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2011
    Messages:
    1,104
    Likes Received:
    7

    Well...

    Have a look at the 2012 presidential election results, by county:
    [​IMG]


    Take note that almost all dense population centers turn out blue. The entire dang map is almost all red!

    So yes, I agree -- it is urban vs rural. People who live in densely populated areas seem to have an expectation that they will be taken care of.

    People who live in rural areas take pride in taking care of themselves.

    But, more than anything - to me it shows that it truly is a case of the interests of the few trumping the interests of the many. For everything, really. It's what our electoral system has evolved into - and right now it heavily favors democrats because democrats generally get those densely populated areas.

    What this does is creates a situation where the 'many', being those in urban areas, are able to ignore the needs of the 'few', those in rural areas.

    Ohh no, we have smog. Let's pass legislation that affects 100% of the country because we who cover just 10% of the landmass are destroying the resources we have. NOT the other 90% - but they should suffer for our ignorance and overly dense population.

    Ugh.

    Sometimes, I really just hate people. :(
     

    Attached Files:

  10. sjfrellc

    sjfrellc CLM

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2004
    Messages:
    720
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Novi, Michigan
    Sartre said Hell is other people.

    Krauthammer is right, but unless I see the article I don't believe he advocates confiscation, merely stating the obvious and having an astute observation that the 1994 weapons ban was a farce and nonsensical. A new ban would punish the law abiding more than prevent criminals.
     
  11. hogfish

    hogfish Señor Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2005
    Messages:
    6,060
    Likes Received:
    849
    Location:
    fl
    "Leave me alone." :thumbsup: