close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Budget crunched: The facts of Romney’s proposed $2 trillion Defense Increas

Discussion in 'Political Issues' started by Flintlocker, Oct 8, 2012.


  1. The Machinist

    The Machinist
    Expand Collapse
    No Compromise

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2009
    6,308
    262
    Location:
    The Left Coast
    Are you at all capable of defending anything in Obama's record? Just curious.
     

  2. Flintlocker

    Flintlocker
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2011
    1,247
    0
    I'm wondering if any of you are going to bother to respond to anything Romney does or says. All you do is try to change the subject and toss out schoolyard taunts like the children you appear to be.
     
  3. The Machinist

    The Machinist
    Expand Collapse
    No Compromise

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2009
    6,308
    262
    Location:
    The Left Coast
    You like to make driveby posts, and rarely read anything by anyone else. You ought to already know I'm not voting for Romney. I can defend my vote and my beliefs all day long. I'm asking you if you can defend Obama and his record.
     
  4. GAFinch

    GAFinch
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2009
    5,911
    28
    Location:
    Georgia
    From the article:

     
  5. DOC44

    DOC44
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2004
    15,579
    4,513
    Location:
    in my recliner
    both of y'all are a waste.

    Doc44
     
  6. Flintlocker

    Flintlocker
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2011
    1,247
    0
    Ok, fair enough. I think Obama's defense spending, as depicted on the graph above, is reasonable considering we've left Iraq. I think Romney's plan for a $2 Trillion increase, that the Pentagon hasn't asked for, is absolutely bat**** crazy. Couple that with his massive tax cut plans and it's a recipe for financial disaster.
     
  7. QNman

    QNman
    Expand Collapse
    resU deretsigeR
    Silver Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2005
    9,898
    360
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO
    An awful lot of assumptions and extrapolation there. Like the selection of 2022 as the end point - 10 years? Why? Romney couldn't possibly be POTUS for that long.

    If the dollars spent are wasted for four years, certainly the Dems can mount a better defense against him?

    That said, if Rick of Ricks Foreign Policy, a writer with arguably good foreign policy credentials, is correct is his assumptions, then Romney and I may have some slight differences. Not enough to make me support Obama - who apparently is entirely unable to run on one shred of a four year record.
     
    #8 QNman, Oct 8, 2012
    Last edited: Oct 8, 2012
  8. QNman

    QNman
    Expand Collapse
    resU deretsigeR
    Silver Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2005
    9,898
    360
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO
    Is that a "no"?
     
  9. QNman

    QNman
    Expand Collapse
    resU deretsigeR
    Silver Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2005
    9,898
    360
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO
    Wow... you got one whole sentence about Obama's plan out before resorting, once again, to Romney bashing.

    Anything in the last four years you're particularly proud of? Anything you hope to see four more years of?
     
  10. stormspotter

    stormspotter
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2005
    2,130
    0
    Location:
    Tornado alley
    Looks like we'll be in for some much needed rain thursday thru sunday. Might even have to do some spotting if conditions are right.



    Thursday Scattered showers and thunderstorms after 8am. Mostly cloudy, with a high near 70. Chance of precipitation is 40%. New rainfall amounts of less than a tenth of an inch, except higher amounts possible in thunderstorms.

    Thursday Night Showers and thunderstorms likely, mainly after 8pm. Mostly cloudy, with a low around 52. Chance of precipitation is 60%.

    Friday Showers and thunderstorms likely. Mostly cloudy, with a high near 64. Chance of precipitation is 60%.

    Friday Night Scattered showers and thunderstorms. Cloudy, with a low around 58. Chance of precipitation is 40%.

    Saturday Scattered showers and thunderstorms. Mostly cloudy, with a high near 75. Chance of precipitation is 50%.
    Saturday Night Scattered showers and thunderstorms. Mostly cloudy, with a low around 56. Chance of precipitation is 50%.

    Sunday Scattered showers and thunderstorms. Mostly sunny, with a high near 72. Chance of precipitation is 40%.
     
  11. cowboy1964

    cowboy1964
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2009
    19,450
    1,993
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    Pot calling kettle.
     
  12. QNman

    QNman
    Expand Collapse
    resU deretsigeR
    Silver Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2005
    9,898
    360
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO
    I keep wondering if he's capable of an entire paragraph on the last four years and how prosperous they were, giving clear reasons for why we should vote FOR Obama, instead of simply bashing Romney and repeating the leftist talking points on a right-leaning forum...

    I guess not.
     
  13. cowboy1964

    cowboy1964
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2009
    19,450
    1,993
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    FY 2010 defense spending was 4.7%. Romney wants it to be about 4%. 4% is the level that the people-in-the-know think is reasonable. Too bad there are so many UNreasonable, intellectually bereft, people out there that continue to be the pawns and lackeys of the left.

    Wanna talk trillions? Let's talk about the $5 trillion O has added to the debt in four years. That's $50,000 for every taxpayer in this country. Pony up.
     
    #14 cowboy1964, Oct 8, 2012
    Last edited: Oct 8, 2012
  14. engineer151515

    engineer151515
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2003
    14,138
    220
    Can you substantiate this statement. The Romney "plan" for a $2 Trillion increase Pentagon hasn't asked for?


    So Obama's policy sounds so much more . . "sane"?
    [​IMG]


    Plus these additional "bat**** crazy opinions from a source your original article references:

    http://www.mittromney.com/issues/national-defense

    Plus these little quotes from your article

    and

    all make me wonder how you Liberals how you make this stuff up.
     
    #15 engineer151515, Oct 8, 2012
    Last edited: Oct 9, 2012
  15. Brucev

    Brucev
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2009
    9,189
    5
    Looks like sequestering is the best option for reigning in the dod and its enmeshed symbiotic industries. Much better than increased spending that yields no return to the middle class.
     
  16. Bren

    Bren
    Expand Collapse
    NRA Life Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2005
    41,126
    7,612
    Location:
    Kentucky
    That's all your posts merit. What did you say? Not a single word. Just somebody else's graph and story. You get what your posts are worth.

    As for the defense budget, we've been getting annual raises the DOD/Army specifically asked congress NOT to give during the Obama administration, so it would be hard to point at Romney for the same, even if true.
     
    #17 Bren, Oct 9, 2012
    Last edited: Oct 9, 2012
  17. Bruce H

    Bruce H
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2000
    3,829
    324
    Location:
    missouri
    So get a sharp stick and defend the nation from the maurading hords idiot.
     
  18. pugman

    pugman
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    May 16, 2003
    6,071
    230
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    Ah..I can see the American politican continues to succeed pitting Democrat/Liberal vs Republican/Conservative vs Third party - let them argue each other to death throwing barbs - while all along politicans continue to treat this country like a $20 trick and laugh all the way to the bank.

    Any way you spend it - they are spending money we don't have.

    Notice how the entire article quotes spending as a portion of GDP. When did we get away from the idea of a budget? Why quote GDP - because the numbers then don't seem as bad.

    So now instead of the federal government tell us how much they will spend (aka a budget) now they just say we will take a percentage of what you make kind of like...the mob?

    Just a thought: maybe if they cut/maintained military spending the military would spend it more efficiently? Remember, these are the same idiots who spent $5 billion dollars to develop a camo pattern they aren't going to use.
     
    #19 pugman, Oct 9, 2012
    Last edited: Oct 9, 2012