close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Bristol Palin Has A Bone To Pick With Obama Over Gay Marriage

Discussion in 'Political Issues' started by DOC44, May 12, 2012.


  1. DOC44

    DOC44
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2004
    15,532
    4,439
    Location:
    in my recliner
  2. hogship

    hogship
    Expand Collapse
    It's MY Island

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2004
    11,965
    1,737
    Location:
    Northwest territory, pardner!
    Same sex marriage has been rejected by the voters of this country repeatedly. These are people BHO represents.

    I have a relative who supports gay marriage, and every time I ask why it must be called a marriage, the answer comes in the form of a question. As long as the same sex couples are not restricted any of their rights to their alternative lifestyle, and are given every single benefit of a married couple, except a marriage certificate.......what's the point behind their thinking that's not being discussed?

    Well, I'll tell you what the point is: The real purpose behind the push to call marriage a union between other than one man and one woman, is that it's specifically designed to alter the traditional concept of marriage......in other words, to change the values and moral foundations of those who don't believe it's right to alter their foundational beliefs.

    It has absolutely nothing to do with denying any rights or privileges, and everything to do with changing moral concept, or traditional values. This is something most people who hold traditional values and moral concepts do not wish to do, and this issue forces a national attitude that goes against the will of the majority of Americans.

    There, you have it..........:wavey:

    ooc
     

    #2 hogship, May 12, 2012
    Last edited: May 12, 2012
  3. ChuteTheMall

    ChuteTheMall
    Expand Collapse
    HildabeastHater

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2000
    51,251
    49,552
    Location:
    Anti-Obamaville
    Let the people vote on it in November.
     
  4. hogship

    hogship
    Expand Collapse
    It's MY Island

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2004
    11,965
    1,737
    Location:
    Northwest territory, pardner!
    I would support a national vote on this issue......but, that won't happen with the gay rights activists. What they want is for government to change this for them......and avoid putting it to a vote.

    ooc
     
  5. rahrah12

    rahrah12
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    3,975
    16
    Location:
    Seattle
    Nuclear war policies...his stance on gay marriage...seems about equal...

    Glad to know Brstol is for a traditional marriage...:whistling:
     
    #5 rahrah12, May 12, 2012
    Last edited: May 12, 2012
  6. QNman

    QNman
    Expand Collapse
    resU deretsigeR
    Silver Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2005
    9,896
    360
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO
    I've got a better idea... Get the government out of the marriage business. No more tax deductions, etc. if you've proclaimed your love via marriage, that should suffice for property rights.

    If gay folks can find a preacher willing to call them married, then who gives a rip? Take out the fed.gov and the Benny's afforded married couples, I will bet you this issue drops to near zero overnight.
     
  7. eracer

    eracer
    Expand Collapse
    Where's my EBT?

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2011
    6,711
    2
    Location:
    Tampa, FL
    Bristol's picked a few bones in her day.

    She gave up the right to moralize about sex when she had a child out of wedlock.
     
    #7 eracer, May 12, 2012
    Last edited: May 12, 2012
  8. Paul7

    Paul7
    Expand Collapse
    New Guy

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2004
    14,772
    1,263
    Location:
    East of Eden
    She acknowledges it was a mistake. Have you ever made one?
     
  9. Paul7

    Paul7
    Expand Collapse
    New Guy

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2004
    14,772
    1,263
    Location:
    East of Eden
    From the mouth of babes, way to go Bristol. Let's hope we have another Palin to be a thorn in the left's side for a long time to come.
     
  10. camelotkid

    camelotkid
    Expand Collapse
    non-believer

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2009
    1,937
    0
    Location:
    Oak Ridge, TN
    Thorn? more like something to laugh at and possibly ********** to:rofl:
     
  11. JBnTX

    JBnTX
    Expand Collapse
    Texas

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2008
    19,574
    3,629
    Location:
    Texas
    So much for keeping ones sex life in the bedroom.
     
  12. Gary W Trott

    Gary W Trott
    Expand Collapse
    Prickley Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2002
    5,011
    0
    Location:
    West Warwick, RI
    Wasn't he making fun of Ted Kennedy for doing the same thing on some issue? Or maybe it was Kennedy making fun of him, I just remember the two of them going at it.
     
  13. HarlDane

    HarlDane
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2005
    6,284
    1,195
    Location:
    San Joaquin Valley
    Could not agree more.

    But until that happens, it's an equal protection issue.
     
  14. maxsnafu

    maxsnafu
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2006
    2,942
    1
    ^^^Best idea I've heard all week.^^^
     
  15. G29Reload

    G29Reload
    Expand Collapse
    Tread Lightly

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2009
    13,286
    362
    Not even remotely, logically possible. Non-sequitor.


    A marriage creates legal entanglements. It's like forming a new corporation, legal joint purchasing power, fiduciary responsibility over bank accounts, credit, property ownership, joint liabilities, taxation, , inheritance, medical issues, responsibilities over bearing children, responsibility therefore, inoculations, school registry, liability for behavioral issues, etc. List is endless.

    Therefore, someone has to produce metadata and define what marriage is, so we're all talking about the same thing, and there is no confusion. It used to be that we didn't grant special privilege to the mentally ill, we incarcerated them. There was no question what marriage was because it was obvious. Now we have to listen to the mentally ill have standing in arguing that marriage is something its not, in order to satisfy 3% of population in its moral bankruptcy, psychologically dysfunctional, anti-social desires to live like freaks.

    Worse, its not even something compatible with that lifestyle. Hey, fish, here's your bicycle! Wait, what?

    The whole concept is incompatible with a lifestyle that bends to the promiscuous. Even batched with that "LGBT nonsense…the "B" part. Bisexual? That's with both sexes. So, the next thing needed is to produce legislation that says groups of people can get married? Marriage is between 3 people? Why not 5? We can't have marriage constraining people to groups of 2, since that would UNFAIRLY WAH!!!) prevent a person who goes both ways from being with his other "attraction".

    What a crock of s#$*!

    Now if you don't define everything, people will start listing their dog as a dependent on their tax forms (it's happened) and someone WILL try to marry their dog, or pony, etc. The folks who say this is a slippery slope are absolutely right…gotta get it nailed down or someone will say, hey, if was between a man and a woman, now its two men, or two women, I'd like to be at one with my cat, or, hey this expensive vase from the Ming Dynasty has been in my family for so long, and we're already attached at the hip, so…


    Don't laugh. Someone, somewhere, will try a "stunt", and some bozo judge with allow it and the next thing you know…

    Set a definition, lock it down. Or else.
     
    #15 G29Reload, May 12, 2012
    Last edited: May 12, 2012
  16. automatic slim

    automatic slim
    Expand Collapse
    Walmart Shopper

    Joined:
    May 28, 2007
    3,767
    717
    Location:
    Disputed Territory
    You are correct. You would be labeled a "bigot", and other things I cannot repeat here, if you lived here in NC. Ooh, and also a "hayseed"......
    The only bigots I have seen on this issue are the lefties....talking violence too. :wavey:
     
  17. G29Reload

    G29Reload
    Expand Collapse
    Tread Lightly

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2009
    13,286
    362
    No, that doesn't deprive you of rights.

    In fact, it may have made her an expert, since she's learned some painful lessons due to practical experience.
     
  18. Paul7

    Paul7
    Expand Collapse
    New Guy

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2004
    14,772
    1,263
    Location:
    East of Eden
    Must be why the nut left is so obsessed with the Palin's huh?
     
  19. DOC44

    DOC44
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2004
    15,532
    4,439
    Location:
    in my recliner
    I believe Jimmy went first and really made fun of it.

    Doc44
     
  20. Alizard

    Alizard
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2012
    1,282
    2
    Really? Maybe in the redneck states, but across the entire country that statement is false. The current approval is 50 - 48 in favor of legal same sex marriage (Gallup poll)
     
    #20 Alizard, May 12, 2012
    Last edited: May 12, 2012