Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Forum at

Why should YOU join our forums?

  • Connect with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Read up on the latest product reviews
  • Make new friends to go shooting with!
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

Glock Talk is the #1 site to discuss the world’s most popular pistol, chat about firearms, accessories and more.

Bristol Palin Has A Bone To Pick With Obama Over Gay Marriage

Discussion in 'Political Issues' started by DOC44, May 12, 2012.

  1. DOC44


    Jan 10, 2004
    in my recliner
  2. hogship

    hogship It's MY Island

    Same sex marriage has been rejected by the voters of this country repeatedly. These are people BHO represents.

    I have a relative who supports gay marriage, and every time I ask why it must be called a marriage, the answer comes in the form of a question. As long as the same sex couples are not restricted any of their rights to their alternative lifestyle, and are given every single benefit of a married couple, except a marriage certificate.......what's the point behind their thinking that's not being discussed?

    Well, I'll tell you what the point is: The real purpose behind the push to call marriage a union between other than one man and one woman, is that it's specifically designed to alter the traditional concept of other words, to change the values and moral foundations of those who don't believe it's right to alter their foundational beliefs.

    It has absolutely nothing to do with denying any rights or privileges, and everything to do with changing moral concept, or traditional values. This is something most people who hold traditional values and moral concepts do not wish to do, and this issue forces a national attitude that goes against the will of the majority of Americans.

    There, you have it..........:wavey:

    Last edited: May 12, 2012

  3. Let the people vote on it in November.
  4. hogship

    hogship It's MY Island

    I would support a national vote on this issue......but, that won't happen with the gay rights activists. What they want is for government to change this for them......and avoid putting it to a vote.

  5. rahrah12


    Sep 15, 2008
    Nuclear war policies...his stance on gay marriage...seems about equal...

    Glad to know Brstol is for a traditional marriage...:whistling:
    Last edited: May 12, 2012
  6. QNman

    QNman resU deretsigeR Silver Member

    Oct 5, 2005
    St. Louis, MO
    I've got a better idea... Get the government out of the marriage business. No more tax deductions, etc. if you've proclaimed your love via marriage, that should suffice for property rights.

    If gay folks can find a preacher willing to call them married, then who gives a rip? Take out the and the Benny's afforded married couples, I will bet you this issue drops to near zero overnight.
  7. eracer

    eracer Where's my EBT?

    Apr 5, 2011
    Tampa, FL
    Bristol's picked a few bones in her day.

    She gave up the right to moralize about sex when she had a child out of wedlock.
    Last edited: May 12, 2012
  8. Paul7


    Dec 16, 2004
    East of Eden
    She acknowledges it was a mistake. Have you ever made one?
  9. Paul7


    Dec 16, 2004
    East of Eden
    From the mouth of babes, way to go Bristol. Let's hope we have another Palin to be a thorn in the left's side for a long time to come.
  10. camelotkid

    camelotkid non-believer

    Apr 27, 2009
    Oak Ridge, TN
    Thorn? more like something to laugh at and possibly ********** to:rofl:
  11. JBnTX

    JBnTX Bible Thumper

    Aug 28, 2008
    Fort Worth Texas
    So much for keeping ones sex life in the bedroom.
  12. Gary W Trott

    Gary W Trott Prickley Fan

    Sep 23, 2002
    West Warwick, RI
    Wasn't he making fun of Ted Kennedy for doing the same thing on some issue? Or maybe it was Kennedy making fun of him, I just remember the two of them going at it.
  13. HarlDane


    Jul 26, 2005
    San Joaquin Valley
    Could not agree more.

    But until that happens, it's an equal protection issue.
  14. maxsnafu


    Dec 29, 2006
    ^^^Best idea I've heard all week.^^^
  15. G29Reload

    G29Reload Tread Lightly

    Sep 28, 2009
    Not even remotely, logically possible. Non-sequitor.

    A marriage creates legal entanglements. It's like forming a new corporation, legal joint purchasing power, fiduciary responsibility over bank accounts, credit, property ownership, joint liabilities, taxation, , inheritance, medical issues, responsibilities over bearing children, responsibility therefore, inoculations, school registry, liability for behavioral issues, etc. List is endless.

    Therefore, someone has to produce metadata and define what marriage is, so we're all talking about the same thing, and there is no confusion. It used to be that we didn't grant special privilege to the mentally ill, we incarcerated them. There was no question what marriage was because it was obvious. Now we have to listen to the mentally ill have standing in arguing that marriage is something its not, in order to satisfy 3% of population in its moral bankruptcy, psychologically dysfunctional, anti-social desires to live like freaks.

    Worse, its not even something compatible with that lifestyle. Hey, fish, here's your bicycle! Wait, what?

    The whole concept is incompatible with a lifestyle that bends to the promiscuous. Even batched with that "LGBT nonsense…the "B" part. Bisexual? That's with both sexes. So, the next thing needed is to produce legislation that says groups of people can get married? Marriage is between 3 people? Why not 5? We can't have marriage constraining people to groups of 2, since that would UNFAIRLY WAH!!!) prevent a person who goes both ways from being with his other "attraction".

    What a crock of s#$*!

    Now if you don't define everything, people will start listing their dog as a dependent on their tax forms (it's happened) and someone WILL try to marry their dog, or pony, etc. The folks who say this is a slippery slope are absolutely right…gotta get it nailed down or someone will say, hey, if was between a man and a woman, now its two men, or two women, I'd like to be at one with my cat, or, hey this expensive vase from the Ming Dynasty has been in my family for so long, and we're already attached at the hip, so…

    Don't laugh. Someone, somewhere, will try a "stunt", and some bozo judge with allow it and the next thing you know…

    Set a definition, lock it down. Or else.
    Last edited: May 12, 2012
  16. automatic slim

    automatic slim Walmart Shopper

    May 28, 2007
    Disputed Territory
    You are correct. You would be labeled a "bigot", and other things I cannot repeat here, if you lived here in NC. Ooh, and also a "hayseed"......
    The only bigots I have seen on this issue are the lefties....talking violence too. :wavey:
  17. G29Reload

    G29Reload Tread Lightly

    Sep 28, 2009
    No, that doesn't deprive you of rights.

    In fact, it may have made her an expert, since she's learned some painful lessons due to practical experience.
  18. Paul7


    Dec 16, 2004
    East of Eden
    Must be why the nut left is so obsessed with the Palin's huh?
  19. DOC44


    Jan 10, 2004
    in my recliner
    I believe Jimmy went first and really made fun of it.

  20. Alizard


    Apr 5, 2012
    Really? Maybe in the redneck states, but across the entire country that statement is false. The current approval is 50 - 48 in favor of legal same sex marriage (Gallup poll)
    Last edited: May 12, 2012