close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Talk

Why should YOU join our Glock forum?

  • Converse with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Learn about the latest hunting products
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.

breacher choke really needed ????

Discussion in 'Tactical Shotguns' started by dennis3dflyer, Mar 14, 2010.

  1. dennis3dflyer

    dennis3dflyer

    1,159
    172
    Feb 20, 2007
    Florida
    Is a Breacher Choke really needed ? Increase Saftey or effect >???

    I see how it helps hold position on the area you wish to destroy but if you just hold off yourself a few inches from the area to be destroyed and have a steady hold will you have the same effect ???

    Thanks Dennis
     
    Last edited: Mar 14, 2010
  2. Breaching stand offs are usefull tools but not absolutely essential. A good serrated stand off makes precision placement easier, keeps your muzzle on target and vents gas preventing a barrel blowout even if you had teh muzzle square on the target. If you are under stress and working fast and in the dark nothing is easier than jamming the muzzle stand off into the door / frame intersection and letting fly.
     


  3. remat

    remat

    2,049
    0
    Mar 19, 2006
    Seattle, WA
    Good answer!
    Just make sure leaving an offset space between the muzzle and the door...
     
  4. One of those would be handy. I can't remember all the times I have needed to breach a door with a shotgun. Seems like alot of junk would ricochet into your face when you do that. I just keep a spare key hidden since I not on the swat team.
     
  5. They may be useful if you are doing a lot of breaching but myself, I just use the doorknob on my house. Can't really see myself breaching my way out of my house so for me, no, a breaching choke, barrel, pointy thingy on the end of my shotgun is about as useful as teats on a boar.
     
  6. Devils Haircut

    Devils Haircut

    15
    0
    Feb 24, 2010
  7. bikerdog

    bikerdog

    1,722
    9
    Feb 11, 2009
    Good answer. I would just like to ad, if your talking about the breaching choke tubes that are now being sold on the Remington 870. Their not real breaching tools. normal breaching tools are welded to the front of the barrel, what remington is selling would never hold up during real use.
     
  8. Syclone538

    Syclone538

    2,086
    0
    Jan 8, 2006
    I would think that would be a liability issue unless they have a bunch of warnings all over the package/box the gun/choke comes in and on the choke itself. But I don't know, maybe they do.
     
    Last edited: Mar 14, 2010
  9. bikerdog

    bikerdog

    1,722
    9
    Feb 11, 2009
    I don't think there is to much liability, because when one of these fails it would probably just go down range. I,E no critical failure.
     
  10. DPris

    DPris

    921
    22
    Mar 3, 2006
    Utah
    Remington told me they don't consider those as actual breachers, they're there for looks.

    And- emphatically no, you do not need a breacher. :)
    Denis
     
  11. Syclone538

    Syclone538

    2,086
    0
    Jan 8, 2006
    It's not going to go very far down range when it's up against a door, or are you thinking it will break apart at random while shooting at something farther away? I would think we would have heard about that by now.
     
  12. aippi

    aippi

    1,726
    17
    Jun 12, 2009
    The Remington Tactical Choke or as we call the Rem Joke is of no value and only adds length to your weapon.
     
    Last edited: Mar 21, 2010
  13. DPris

    DPris

    921
    22
    Mar 3, 2006
    Utah
    The one I tried did seem to offer some recoil reduction, I'm not entirely sure I'd say they're completely worthless. :)
    But, their inclusion on the package came from their marketing department, not from anything else.
    Denis
     
  14. Syclone538

    Syclone538

    2,086
    0
    Jan 8, 2006
    Yeah I definitely agree that 99.9% of people have no use for a breacher, and those that do shouldn't use the rem tactical choke, but I just don't think Remington would have made it if it was much more dangerous then a real breacher when people try it.
     
  15. DPris

    DPris

    921
    22
    Mar 3, 2006
    Utah
    The "breacher" choke was added at the marketing department's suggestion, the threads are not intended to stand the pressures if used as a breacher.
    That's direct from Remington.
    Denis
     
  16. Syclone538

    Syclone538

    2,086
    0
    Jan 8, 2006
    I understand that, but you know people are going to try it, and I'm sure Remington knows that too.
     
  17. DPris

    DPris

    921
    22
    Mar 3, 2006
    Utah
    Quite possibly people may try it, and I doubt it'll be a catastrophic failure if & when they do. It'll most likely be a one-try situation, after which those involved will know better.

    I don't imagine that choke'll be in the lineup for very much longer.
    You'll note you don't see it on any of the police-designated models.

    Denis
     
  18. B Coyote

    B Coyote

    1,816
    0
    Jul 3, 2001
    NW Indiana
    But, but, but, but...

    It looks SO tacticool and will help me pick up the new girl at the pretzel store across from the piercing kiosk.

    :whistling:

    bc
     
  19. i personally only purchase weapons based on whatever football-bat idea they stick on it.breacher chokes....railsin every direction...pistol bayonets. all useful for "real" operators.



    see ya....i gotta go breech the fridge for a beer