close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Talk

Why should YOU join our Glock forum?

  • Converse with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Learn about the latest hunting products
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.

Benefits Of External Extractor?

Discussion in '1911 Forums' started by The Expert, Nov 11, 2010.

  1. The Expert

    The Expert

    86
    0
    May 2, 2010
    Is there a benefit to an external extractor on a 1911? I saw this picture recently and wondered it the selling point was just that it was different and different=good in a crowded market.

    [​IMG]
     
  2. nolt

    nolt DONT PANIC!

    861
    0
    Aug 4, 2009
    if you are Sig Sauer then its a great way to bastardize the 1911 into something that is "Unmistakeably Sig!!"
    (their words not mine.)
    im struggling with anything else to add.

    im not such a hater of EEs that i think youre going to hell for having one on a 1911 the way some people seem to be. but i dont own a 1911 that has one, and have no current plans for one.
    i refuse to discredit or demean the work of smiths like PL that do incredible work with them. they just arent for me.
     

    Last edited: Nov 11, 2010

  3. Quack

    Quack Rent this space

    9,991
    9
    Jan 7, 2002
    NE Ohio
    Some work (sig, s&w, PL) and some don't (Kimber)
     
  4. cole

    cole Millennium Member

    3,287
    0
    Dec 25, 1999
    This. IMO, when it works, it can work better than the traditional internal setup and for a longer period of time. IMO, there is a reason the external extractor is used on most modern guns. However, a properly tuned extractor (ideally, it comes that way from the factory) in a well-cared for 1911 will run reliably. Traditionalist, me included, prefer internal on a 1911.
     
  5. bac1023

    bac1023

    102,310
    2,689
    Sep 26, 2004
    PA
    Well, for Paul Liebenberg, he personally told me that he gets the best performance from them. He's basically the father of the external extractor in a 1911. While I prefer the looks of an internal, the external doesn't bother me. Liebenberg builds some of the best pistols in the world.


    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Nov 11, 2010
  6. bac1023

    bac1023

    102,310
    2,689
    Sep 26, 2004
    PA
    Unertl had it right too.

    What a shame they're no more. :crying:


    [​IMG]
     
  7. CAcop

    CAcop

    19,668
    2,294
    Jul 21, 2002
    California
    The benefit of an external extractor is that if it starts going south you can either replace the extractor or the spring without having to worry about tuning. Just an armorer's point of view.
     
  8. brisk21

    brisk21

    4,203
    10
    May 13, 2008
    Michigan

    Theyd probably be flourishing if there were more Bacs in the country!!!
     
  9. bac1023

    bac1023

    102,310
    2,689
    Sep 26, 2004
    PA
    LOL!

    Maybe so, but they were primarily a high end optics company. I'm honestly not sure what happened. :dunno:

    http://www.unertloptics.com/
     
  10. GVFlyer

    GVFlyer Senior Member

    10,616
    1,628
    Sep 9, 2008
    Somewhere in the air.
    I have 1911s with both internal extractors and external extractors - both function well.
     
  11. Johan Beer

    Johan Beer

    243
    0
    May 2, 2005
    The external extractor is proven to be more reliable. Almost all modern pistols have them.

    That being said, I'll take an internal on my 1911, thank you. Top tier 1911 companies know how to do it, and it looks much better.
     
  12. Jim Watson

    Jim Watson

    4,299
    46
    Jul 10, 2001
    Alabama
    Smith & Wesson will tell you that you are not smart enough or well equipped enough to change out their external extractor; it takes the right gauge and torsion bar to fit one up.
     
  13. Zombie Steve

    Zombie Steve Decap Pin Killa

    18,083
    18
    May 31, 2007
    Old Colorado City

    No one will steal your 1911.
     
  14. bac1023

    bac1023

    102,310
    2,689
    Sep 26, 2004
    PA
    :rofl:
     
  15. JohnVal81

    JohnVal81

    17
    0
    Jun 28, 2010
    Tampa
  16. 1006

    1006

    873
    0
    Aug 12, 2007
    Newnan, Georgia
    I think the external ones have a wider operational envelope for lack of a better way to put it. EX: Almost every forty cal with an external extractor can be converted to 9mm with a simple barrel and mag change. And, they are easier to make and install for a new production line worker.
     
    Last edited: Nov 12, 2010
  17. Tucson_1

    Tucson_1

    534
    1
    Feb 19, 2009
    I had a Kimber TLE II with an EE and it ran flawlessly. It seems to be hit or miss for Kimber though...

    Speaking of missing, I miss that TLE. Should have kept that one...
    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Nov 13, 2010
  18. AA#5

    AA#5

    5,099
    0
    Nov 26, 2008
    I have a gun with an internal extractor design that's the closest to a 1911's design I've ever seen.

    It's an Uzi & so far I've fired 28,000 rounds through it without a malfunction or parts replacement - including the extractor. That's with 9mm and 45 acp.
     
  19. 1006

    1006

    873
    0
    Aug 12, 2007
    Newnan, Georgia
    I am not sure the UZI is really a good comparison. I really don't know much about it. I think it fires with an open bolt; the extractor may be not much more than a guide for the exiting case.