close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Ballistic Fingerprinting Law in MI

Discussion in 'Michigan Glockers' started by mac66, Aug 2, 2007.


  1. mac66

    mac66
    Expand Collapse
    Huge Member
    Millennium Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 1999
    5,912
    211
    Location:
    Blue Planet
    FYI,

    The first draft of a law to make FFLs provide ballistic fingerprinting records of all handguns sold in MI hit the legislature yesterday. This is just a proposed law and has to run the gauntlet to make into law. I don't think ballistic fingerprinting makes much impact on crime and I suppose it really doesn't matter much to most of us but why do it?

    http://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2007-2008/billintroduced/House/htm/2007-HIB-5079.htm
     

    Wanna kill these ads? We can help!
  2. Blitzer

    Blitzer
    Expand Collapse
    Cool Cat

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2004
    12,111
    0
    Location:
    The communist's play ground of OHIO
    It hasn't done much to assist law enforcement elsewhere so why would it work in MI?

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     

  3. Hailstorm

    Hailstorm
    Expand Collapse
    Boom Shacka

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2002
    2,421
    0
    Location:
    Canton Mi
    Anytime they can pass another law that has anything to do guns. Is a step in the wrong direction.
     
  4. john_glock_mi

    john_glock_mi
    Expand Collapse
    Guest

    Yet another waste of ink on paper......
     
  5. Xenia

    Xenia
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2007
    46
    0
    Location:
    Michigan
    What is interesting is that in addition to the ballistic fingerprinting this bill protects gun companies from being sued related to someone being harmed by a gun used against them. (my paraphrase)

    With that in place I wonder what the NRA would think of this? The protection for gun companies is a good thing, imo, but the ballistic tests seems like a great way to spend our hard earned tax dollars. Think of the work and costs involved for the state to get that information processed.
     
  6. centennial

    centennial
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    225
    0
    The bill only refers to licensed FFLs. It doesn't cover private sales, so it's pretty useless as far as a law enforcement tool.
    Ballistic fingerprinting has been proven ineffective in areas that use it.
    All it will do is raise the price of used firearms on dealers shelves and create another layer of useless administrative work for dealers AND the MSP who already doesn't have enough funding to do what they are supposed to.
    Tying it to a release of responsibility is total bull****.
    There is no way a dealer should be held responsible for what happens to a gun after the sale unless the dealer sold the gun to a person who is prevented from legally owning firearms.
     
Loading...
Similar Threads Forum Date
MARYLAND ENDS BALLISTIC FINGERPRINTING DATABASE AFTER 15 YEARS, $5 MILLION, NO CRIMES SOLVED The Okie Corral Nov 9, 2015
Instructors fingerprinting in Virginia question Glockers of the Old Dominion Mar 6, 2013
Fingerprinting? Cop Talk Feb 4, 2012
Common sense in MI? Michigan Glockers Jan 22, 2008
WTB: AR in MI Wanted To Buy Aug 30, 2006
Duty Gear at CopsPlus