Just a tip: when I've told you multiple times that I in fact don't claim to know, you probably ought not to claim that I can't admit it, because I can simply point to a post where I've admitted I don't know, directly to you, and you look foolish. To whit: http://glocktalk.com/forums/showpost.php?p=16266121&postcount=91 I have been admitting, to you, that I do not know for approximately two and a half years. I have done so multiple times, in multiple different threads. Ten seconds of googling your nick, my nick, 'know' and 'religion' led me to an example. Why can't you get my answer to the question of whether or not I claim to know, or think I know, into your head? And if it is, as you claim, irrelevant, why do you keep harping on it? Especially since every time you claim I think I know, or 'can't admit' that I don't know, you're wrong? Hey, I cannot know with certainty whether or not there is a deity. <-- oops, I did it *again*. I cannot know whether or not there is a deity. <-- uh-oh, looks a whole lot like you're wrong, doesn't it? Oh, hey, another example from this very thread, which you even *quoted* in your post at http://www.glocktalk.com/forums/showpost.php?p=20214969&postcount=114 -> How many times to I have to say it before you will stop claiming otherwise?