close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Arasaka type 99

Discussion in 'Military Surplus Forum' started by ChesterCRD, Aug 24, 2010.


  1. ChesterCRD

    ChesterCRD
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    44
    0
    Location:
    Central Florida
    I know there is a ton of information on this rifle available on the web, but I'm having trouble finding a particular piece of it. :)

    I have one and it seems to be in reasonable condition. However the forward section of the stock slides off, and I'm wondering what is supposed to retain it. All the parts appear to be present. So my question...

    There is a hole in the stock just forward of the magazine cover (in the wood, forward of the screw at the front of the mag cover). This seems to be about where the threaded end of the cleaning rod (aka stacking rod?) would be when the stacking rod is inserted. There appears to be nothing there for the rod to thread into. I'm wondering whether the rod threads into something and secures the two halves of the stock from sliding apart at the rear barrel band, or if my stock was cut at some point at the rear barrel band in which case I have a damaged stock that shouldn't require anything to hold it together.

    Any info is appreciated.
     

    Wanna kill these ads? We can help!
    #1 ChesterCRD, Aug 24, 2010
    Last edited: Aug 24, 2010
  2. Butch

    Butch
    Expand Collapse
    RetiredDinosaur
    Millennium Member CLM

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 1998
    11,099
    80
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Yup, the lower/main stock should be one piece. They were easier to get into a duffle bag if you cut the stock.

    Is the mum on the top front of the receiver intact? (as compared to being ground off)

    There's a small, square, spring loaded 'button' in the stock just behind the bayonet lug that retains the cleaning rod.
     

    #2 Butch, Aug 30, 2010
    Last edited: Aug 30, 2010
  3. ChesterCRD

    ChesterCRD
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    44
    0
    Location:
    Central Florida
    Yep, the mum is intact. I guess the stock is what people call "duffle cut". I've read a few posts about how to repair that. I'll have to give it some thought.

    Thanks for pointing me in the right direction.
     
  4. Butch

    Butch
    Expand Collapse
    RetiredDinosaur
    Millennium Member CLM

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 1998
    11,099
    80
    Location:
    Minnesota
    An intact mum and the 'duffle cut' would certainly make the rifle appear more likely to be a real battle field pickup (as compared to being a souveneir rifle issued to troops after the war).

    More info-> http://curioandrelicfirearmsforum.yuku.com/forums/15
     
  5. Berto

    Berto
    Expand Collapse
    woo woo

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2003
    24,036
    1,918
    Location:
    WA
    Saw one the other day at the range.
    Had the mum, bipod and airplane sights, appeared to be early war production, darkish bore.
     
  6. nagant123

    nagant123
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2010
    10
    0
    i know a guy who has an arisaka with bipod AA sights MUM inact and not a duffle cut. perfect condition not refinished. his uncle shot a guy and took it off him. hasn't been shot since that day
     
    #6 nagant123, Aug 31, 2010
    Last edited: Aug 31, 2010
  7. ChesterCRD

    ChesterCRD
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    44
    0
    Location:
    Central Florida
    That's pretty much the situation here. I have the rifle with intact mum, monopod, and AA sites. I inherited it from my Grandfather who (I'm told) picked it up off the battlefield. As far as I know it has not been shot since. It hasn't been refinished. It had some surface rust when I got it, most of which came off with a cloth and oil. Everything seems to work properly.
     
  8. Butch

    Butch
    Expand Collapse
    RetiredDinosaur
    Millennium Member CLM

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 1998
    11,099
    80
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Pictures would be great! :)

    Here's an old picture of mine, no monopod, dust cover, or cleaning rod though....
    [​IMG]
     
  9. Butch

    Butch
    Expand Collapse
    RetiredDinosaur
    Millennium Member CLM

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 1998
    11,099
    80
    Location:
    Minnesota
    I took some new pics..... :)

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  10. jrs93accord

    jrs93accord
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2005
    6,121
    135
    Location:
    Pensacola, FL
    My Type 99 Arisaka (Kokura Series 20) circa 1939-40

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]