close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

America could be ‘taken over,’ warns Ross Perot

Discussion in 'Political Issues' started by Ruble Noon, Oct 1, 2012.


  1. The Maggy

    The Maggy
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2008
    3,348
    20
    Location:
    Stillwater, OK
    20 years ago, he was made fun of for predicting our current crisis. I hope that he is wrong about this one.
     

  2. JBnTX

    JBnTX
    Expand Collapse
    Texas

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2008
    19,548
    3,603
    Location:
    Texas
    "Former presidential contender and billionaire Ross Perot is worried that America is a sitting duck for an unnamed foreign invader."


    That "unnamed foreign invader" has a name.
    It's the Militant Islamic Fundamentalist Movement led by Iran.
     
  3. Bren

    Bren
    Expand Collapse
    NRA Life Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2005
    41,022
    7,376
    Location:
    Kentucky
    20 years a go he personally started us on the road to our current crisis by causing Bill Clinton to be elected president - events like dominoes brought us from there to here.

    If he couldn't predict that very obvious result, I have to question his predictive powers.
     
  4. Ruble Noon

    Ruble Noon
    Expand Collapse
    "Cracker"

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2009
    11,018
    2
    No Bren, you caused Clinton to be elected.
     
  5. GAFinch

    GAFinch
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2009
    5,911
    27
    Location:
    Georgia
    Many Republicans have already admitted to having a problem and are taking a harder stance on spending, which is why they're being vilified as right wing extremists by the left, even thought they're just using common sense in the face of an imminent economic disaster. Either progressivism or capitalism will get blamed for the disaster and the winner will probably drastically shape the future of this country.
     
  6. juggy4711

    juggy4711
    Expand Collapse
    Nimrod Son

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2006
    3,060
    0
    Location:
    Galveston County, TX
    Is this some deranged, bizarro version of it's Bush's fault? It's Perot's fault that it is Clinton's fault?
     
  7. TheExplorer

    TheExplorer
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2012
    1,322
    0
    That's what I thought.:rofl:
     
  8. countrygun

    countrygun
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2012
    17,069
    17
    News flash for you Slick.

    A lot of us voted for Perot and got Clinton as a result. We learned about third parties, the braindead still dream and refuse the intrusion of reality and continue of their fantasy, OR they were asleep in history class and are merely first time ignorant who haven't been taught about the effects of third parties
     
  9. G17Jake

    G17Jake
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2002
    6,081
    257
    America has already been taken over. It is time to take it back.
     
  10. Snowman92D

    Snowman92D
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2001
    3,887
    10
    Location:
    Indianapolis
    The Clinton thing was my fault. I was one of the dumbasses who voted for Perot because he was the Real Deal, I was tired of voting against the "lesser of two evils", and I wanted to teach the Republican Party a lesson.

    Mea culpa.
     
  11. Ruble Noon

    Ruble Noon
    Expand Collapse
    "Cracker"

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2009
    11,018
    2
    Nah, it was Bren's fault for not voting for liberty as is the crash that ensued because he voted against Perot.
     
  12. The Maggy

    The Maggy
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2008
    3,348
    20
    Location:
    Stillwater, OK
    No one has yet been able to show Perot's causation of Clinton. There is only a loose correlation between Perot being on the ballot and Clinton winning.

    Using the same logic; someone could assume crime rates increase because more ice-cream is being sold through the summer months.

    Will one of you three that keep claiming this show me some math behind how Perot caused Clinton?
     
  13. countrygun

    countrygun
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2012
    17,069
    17
    An that would prove either Perot helped Clinton,

    or

    it would prove that a vote for a libertarian now, would be as useless as a vote for Perot was then,

    either way it makes a case for voting Romney
     
  14. Bren

    Bren
    Expand Collapse
    NRA Life Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2005
    41,022
    7,376
    Location:
    Kentucky
    Perot took many times the voters that Bush needed to beat Clinton (I posted the actual numbers in another thread). If you were around back then, you know he took the majority of them from the Republican party. Had he not done so, Bush would have won the popular vote by a very wide margin and, fairly certainly, the electoral vote.

    That would have meant, no Bill Clinton, first or second term. Maybe no AWB. No Janet Reno. Likely No Waco and then no Oklahoma City, just among the first things that come to mind. Then, likely no Barack Obama, no Hillary Clinton as candidate or sec of state, a completely different course of events in the middle east - even 9/11 is fairly questionable.
     
  15. Snowman92D

    Snowman92D
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2001
    3,887
    10
    Location:
    Indianapolis
    George H.W. Bush had made some comments about the imminence of a "new world order" during the run-up to the first Gulf War, and that...and a few other issues that now were clearly irrelevant...caused a substantial number of conservatives to leave the Republican fold, in a snit, to vote for Perot.

    That was a very costly lesson that we're still trying to dig out from under.
     
  16. OctoberRust

    OctoberRust
    Expand Collapse
    Anti-Federalist

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    5,668
    0
    Location:
    Texas

    Yes!!! Just like Iraq about to invade us in 2003, right? :rofl:
     
  17. QNman

    QNman
    Expand Collapse
    resU deretsigeR
    Silver Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2005
    9,895
    358
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO
    THIS is why I voted for Perot.
     
  18. QNman

    QNman
    Expand Collapse
    resU deretsigeR
    Silver Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2005
    9,895
    358
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO
    H. w. lost for the same reason W. would have lost had his first term looked more like his second - because he was a mealy-mouthed moderate "centrist" trying to pretend he was a conservative.
     
  19. Skyhook

    Skyhook
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2002
    13,068
    1
    Location:
    USA
    Yes, a lot of otherwise intelligent folks went with Perot. That lack of savvy, political sophistication some may call it, seems to dominate our younger set.

    If you voted for Perot back then, you had lots of well-meaning company which resulted rather directly in a Republican loss. Splitting the group weakens it and the Democrats are extremely good at dividing us as we see by the efforts of Obama's admin.