close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Am I good to go with this load?

Discussion in 'Reloading' started by SC_Dave, Nov 28, 2012.


  1. SC_Dave

    SC_Dave
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2005
    127
    0
    Location:
    Florence, SC
    I know this may be an adolesent question, unless you are new to reloading. Your input is appreciated.

    9mm
    115 gr RN FMJ
    4.1 gr Win 231
    Use: Skills practice on paper and steel
    Glock 17

    4.1 is the starting load recommended by the new Hornady book for Win 231 and 115gr FMJ. I loaded 15 to test and was satisfied the accuracy and had no troubles that I know of. Seemed to operate the slide just fine. I threw in a factory target round in the middle of the mag just to see if I noticed a difference, I did not. Is it ok to be on the low end of the recommendation? Anything else I should consider?
    Thanks, David
     

    Wanna kill these ads? We can help!
    #1 SC_Dave, Nov 28, 2012
    Last edited: Nov 28, 2012
  2. dkf

    dkf
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2010
    5,426
    121
    If the load cycles the gun properly and meets your accuracy requirements I am not seeing a problem. Load up a few hundred and go shooting.
     

  3. JBnTX

    JBnTX
    Expand Collapse
    Texas

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2008
    19,567
    3,627
    Location:
    Texas
    I'd slowly work up the charge to about 4.5 grains of 231. That should still be on the light side.

    It's OK to stay on the low side as long as the pistol functions and accuracy is acceptable. But it's better to have a little buffer, because the gun may malfunction as it gets dirty.

    ..
     
    #3 JBnTX, Nov 28, 2012
    Last edited: Nov 28, 2012
  4. Kentguy

    Kentguy
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2010
    1,701
    93
    Location:
    Kent, OH
    SC_Dave,

    As both of the other guys stated, if your load cycles your pistol and is acceptable to you in the accuracy department, than it's a keeper. :thumbsup:

    JBnTX touched on a point that is worth extra consideration. I have had an experience with minimum charge load once that got the bullet stuck in the barrel. Apparently one cartridge must have had a light charge and that put me at below minimum with not enough to push the bullet out the muzzle.

    You are most likely OK because you are using a lighter bullet (115g), if you were perhaps trying to push a 147g bullet - maybe... maybe not. :dunno:

    Moral of the story... always stay off the bottom, test a few grains higher just to stay on the safe side.

    That's my 2 cents
     
  5. Colorado4Wheel

    Colorado4Wheel
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2006
    14,899
    151
    Location:
    CO
    Perhaps a few "tenths of grains higher" would be more prudent. :wavey:

    Don't want to live life like my avatar.
     
    #5 Colorado4Wheel, Nov 28, 2012
    Last edited: Nov 28, 2012
  6. SC_Dave

    SC_Dave
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2005
    127
    0
    Location:
    Florence, SC
    Good information guys thanks a lot!
    David
     
  7. F106 Fan

    F106 Fan
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2011
    8,033
    267
    When you get to a chronograph, see how fast the bullets are moving. The velocity information in the manual is ALWAYS optimistic.

    Given the velocity, you can compute power factor (pf) as bullet weight in grains times velocity in feet per second. You then divide by 1000 before talking about it.

    You will like to get around 130 pf because the lower limit for competition is 125. BTW, Federal Champion BARELY makes it.

    130 pf for a 115 gr bullets requires 1130 fps. 125 would require 1086 fps. The extra 50 fps is just insurance for the possible variations that might occur at a match with a different chronograph.

    It's just a number to keep in mind. I try to get my loads somewhere above the minimum for the various classes even though I don't compete.

    Richard
     
    #7 F106 Fan, Nov 28, 2012
    Last edited: Nov 30, 2012
  8. Kentguy

    Kentguy
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2010
    1,701
    93
    Location:
    Kent, OH
    "Perhaps a few "tenths of grains higher" would be more prudent."

    Ya like he said. :supergrin:
     
  9. SC_Dave

    SC_Dave
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2005
    127
    0
    Location:
    Florence, SC
    Think I'll bump it up to 4.5 and see how that works. Thanks folks!
    David
     
  10. fredj338

    fredj338
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    21,482
    830
    Location:
    so.cal.
    Well, if it runs & is accurate for you, then you are done. You can always work it up further, see if things get better. I find starting loads are rarely the best in any firearm, any powder/bullet combo.
     
    #10 fredj338, Nov 28, 2012
    Last edited: Nov 28, 2012
  11. Agent6-3/8

    Agent6-3/8
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2006
    7,544
    105
    Location:
    The ramparts of civilization
    I load 4.8g HP-38/W231 under my 115g Berry's. As long as your pistola cycles you're good to go, but 4.1 seems a bit light to me.
     
  12. judgecrater

    judgecrater
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2011
    211
    15
    Location:
    north GA
    Good idea. My G17 did not function well with your light load. Also follow manuals recommendations for OAL as you get past midrange loads as it to will impact pressures.
     
  13. kd8x

    kd8x
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2011
    66
    0
    My 4.1 loads with W231 are a bit too light for my G19...I would get a FTE 1 in 10 or 12 rounds. I'm going to try 4.2-4.3 and try to ease over the "hump".
     
  14. G-30Jet

    G-30Jet
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2000
    994
    0
    Location:
    Kennewick, Washington-The Desert
    All 9 mm brass is rated for +P pressures. The only difference is the head stamp.
     
  15. sourdough44

    sourdough44
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2007
    3,019
    130
    Location:
    WI
    The 4.1 with a 115 grn bullet does seem a bit light to me too. You may have cycle issues with some guns.
     
  16. harrison_creek

    harrison_creek
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2009
    56
    1
    Location:
    Kentucky
    I use 4.5 of 231. 1.125 OAL. Shoots well in my Gen 4 17