close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

ak ?

Discussion in 'The Kalashnikov Klub' started by zukyota, Jan 24, 2010.


  1. zukyota

    zukyota
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2010
    1,190
    353
    Location:
    Alabama
    I looking for an ak & would like to know which would be the best to buy. Machined receiver or stamped ? which is better ?
     

    Wanna kill these ads? We can help!
  2. Jack Greenwell

    Jack Greenwell
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2007
    223
    0
    Location:
    Texas
    I prefer the stamped, I have a wasr 10 and love it. The parts are easier to find for stamped than milled (stocks).
     

  3. 9mm +p+

    9mm +p+
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2005
    1,725
    20
    Location:
    Old Dominion
    :popcorn: Oh boy, ask 100 guys and you'll get 100 different answers. Personally i'm partial to Arsenal's offerings, the Bulgarian models in particular. Lot's of folks have bought their Saiga conversions and love them, I've got several friends who have WASR's and all of them love them. It really depends on how much you want to spend and what exactly you want it for. I know not really an answer but it's true, older MAK's are sweet as are the few Yugos that I've seen. I'd stick with stamped receviers personally but theres nothing wrong with a machined receiver AK either. If you can go to a gunshow and look at as many different types as you can.
     
  4. space_weazel

    space_weazel
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2005
    1,085
    0
    Location:
    Or-e-Gone?
    Buy the milled if you want to spend the money and have a collectors/investment firearm. If you want to shoot it and use it if the need arises, get a stamped and spend the extra money on ammo and training.
     
  5. deputy820

    deputy820
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2008
    4
    0
    Location:
    Livingston,Tn
    if it helps you any the machined reciever is heavier than the stamped reciever and will be more durable than a stamped reciever but a well maintained stamped reciever will probably out last you also if you decide on a stamped reciever research the model you are looking to purchase and make sure the steel is heat treated and hardened some stamped recievers were not hardened and will wear faster than hardened ones not sure what models were not hardened but the norincos and the romanian sar1s are hardened there is a web sight somewhere that list them
     
  6. Aceman

    Aceman
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2008
    6,977
    57
    Location:
    Tampa
    And that about covers it.

    IMO, all the milled gives you for practical use is more weight and marginal insignificant improvement in accuracy for the weight.

    Ever see a failed stamped reciever? Me neither. I'm sure they happen just about as often as a milled one cracks.
     
  7. Jmzzl

    Jmzzl
    Expand Collapse
    AK User

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2010
    222
    0
    Location:
    Kentucky
    You wont be disappointed with a WASR-10. Its your basic AK, yet still as rugged as other AKs that cost over twice as much.

    The only thing I did to mine was add a wood pistol grip, and refinish the furniture ;].
     
    #7 Jmzzl, Jan 24, 2010
    Last edited: Jan 24, 2010
  8. Glockdude1

    Glockdude1
    Expand Collapse
    Federal Member
    CLM

    Joined:
    May 24, 2000
    24,104
    2,440
    Location:
    Beaumont,Texas
    I own both stamped & milled receiver AK's. You can't go wrong ethier way in terms of reliabilty & durability, BUT if you wish to try different stocks, the stamped receiver has many more options availible. Why?

    Most pre ban milled receivers came with a oval hole in the back of the receiver. The post ban milled recivers, came with a round hole & a reverse cut under the receiver making it very difficult (not impossible) to replace the thumbhole stock.

    The stamped receivers, pre & post ban, had the nice square hole in the back of the receiver. Some post ban stamped's, did also have the reverse cut under the receiver, but I have not seen very many that did.

    :cool:
     
  9. FireForged

    FireForged
    Expand Collapse
    Millenium #3936
    Millennium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 1999
    4,248
    114
    Location:
    Rebel South
    You are never going to break an ak other than maybe wear out the barrel. I see no reason at all to pay more money or lug around the additional weight of a milled rifle. Unless of course you just have to have a specific kind of receiver cut for a stock or something like that.
     
  10. Teej

    Teej
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2008
    1,947
    1
    Although Norincos are stamped receivers, didn't they change something so that current production Norinco AK's have heavier stamped receivers. I may be wrong, but I thought that was one of the reasons our Navy Seals when with Norincos?

    So aren't the Norinco's the top stamped receivers out their currently?
     
  11. CarlosC

    CarlosC
    Expand Collapse
    AK Fanatic

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2000
    2,880
    5
    Location:
    DFW area, TX
    The Chinese just use thicker receivers, but so do (did) the Yugoslavians. Chinese and Yugo AKs are both built like tanks though. Unfortunately, neither the Norincos nor the original Yugo AKs are being imported any more. Zastava is importing new AKs, but they are under the "sporter" guise complete with some bizarre cut out in the back of the receiver.

    Overall, the Chinese AKs are hard to beat in terms of quality. I am not sure if that's what influenced the SEALs to ultimately go with the Chinese AKs however. Plausible deniability because of how prolific Chinese AKs are in the world may have had something to do with it too. I'll have to peruse my books and see if I can find a reference for the SEALs decision unless someone else has the answer.
     
  12. andyffer

    andyffer
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    May 30, 2009
    92
    0
    get the nodak spud if you go stamped