close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Advice on 9mm OAL

Discussion in 'Reloading' started by modelflyer2003, Apr 5, 2010.


  1. modelflyer2003

    modelflyer2003
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2010
    71
    0
    I reloaded my first batch of 9mm, and I want your advice. I made 18 rounds of 115 gr. round nose, Berry plated, Hodgdon Universal 4.2gr, OAL 1.156. I arrived at the OAL after measuring one of my factory UMC rounds. I am not sure what OAL to set. They fit fine in my gage. Range report. I had one failure to chamber. When I dropped the magazine and ejected the round, I saw that the plating got scratched up in the process of chambering. I wondered if it failed to feed because of the OAL or possibly because the low charge (4.2 gr of Universal) failed to move the slide adequately enough. The other rounds worked fine. I am using the deluxe press from Lee and the dispenser seems to not be 100% accurate. I made another lot with the same diameter and powder charge and I will shoot them later this week. Should I change the AOL on them? I believe making them shorter will increase the pressure and the velocity. I don’t own a Chrony. My Lyman 49th Ed manual gives only the Max OAL, and the Hodgdon data from the website does not give OAL either. What do you think?<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
     

    Wanna kill these ads? We can help!
  2. chemcmndr

    chemcmndr
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2008
    829
    0
    Location:
    Beavercreek, OH
    Well, the Lyman Manual does give Min OAL, but if I remember correctly, their 115 grain sample bullet was a Hornady XTP (hollow point). The max OAL for 9mm was listed as 1.169" in Lee's Modern Reloading. Depending on the powder, the minimum OAL is somewhere around 1.125" (going off of memory, so I would need someone to verify that). I've read that you get better accuracy from using an OAL closer towards the maximum side, so I wouldn't change your OAL. When I was making my test loads using same powder and bullet, I had an OAL of 1.150" and was starting out at 4.5 grains. The rounds did very well out of my Glock 17. What weapon are you using?
     

  3. modelflyer2003

    modelflyer2003
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2010
    71
    0
    Glock 26. Thanks for you help. I wondered if I was doing right with my OAL. After I shoot what I have made this evening, I think I will increase the powder a little. What is the likeliest reason for the Failure to Chamber? Thanks.
     
    #3 modelflyer2003, Apr 6, 2010
    Last edited: Apr 6, 2010
  4. robin303

    robin303
    Expand Collapse
    Helicopter Nut

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2009
    7,750
    437
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    I might be wrong but I try to set my OAL the same with my 9mm round nose with all grains at 1.135. With hollow points and flat points I set at 1.120. This is with 5 different powders and so confident that I actually have two separate dies that I used lock tite to set them with. That was taking account all the books and data from the net and they work fine in my 9mm Glocks. Just reload 10 rds at 0.1 increments until you find a favorite load. <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:eek:ffice:eek:ffice" /><o:p></o:p>
     
  5. sourdough44

    sourdough44
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2007
    3,019
    130
    Location:
    WI
    I've loaded a Rainier plated 115 grn RN bullet at 1.10 COL. My powder was 4.2 grns of Titegroup. Yes your powder charge is a little on the low side, O.K., if they cycle fine. I came to my COL of 1.10 from listed data, maybe the Hodgdon manual, maybe website too. FYI, I got a 1087 fps average with the 4.2 grns of TG.
     
  6. ron59

    ron59
    Expand Collapse
    Bustin Caps

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    6,927
    20
    Location:
    Smyrna, GA
    I am by no means an expert, but I did a BUNCH of research prior to loading my first batch, looking for both suggested powders, and looking at OALs as well.

    1.130 - 1.135 appears to be a very common range.

    I "neglected" that advice, and went with a much longer OAL of 1.155 and ended up with light loads that shot fine, but were inaccurate. Of course, I could have just dumped MORE powder in, but decided instead to lower my OAL down and worked my load up again. This time I was most interested in achieving a certain power factor (130'ish), and the accuracy I'm getting now is WAY better.
     
  7. Colorado4Wheel

    Colorado4Wheel
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2006
    14,898
    151
    Location:
    CO
    You could load that bullet at 1.100 to 1.170 and not have problems. It's your charge that is more then likely the problem. The G26 is not as tollerant of low power loads. Personally, I would shorten the length to 1.130 and get the charge into the middle range of that powders data. Assuming the reloading data supports my OAL recommendation (which I have never seen one that doesn't). Do your own research.
     
  8. FiremanMike

    FiremanMike
    Expand Collapse
    Way too busy

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2007
    3,850
    323
    Location:
    The interwebs
    I will say (without a chrono) that OAL when I load 9mm seems to effect felt recoil, so I would assume it would effect pressure/velocity as well. My first batch of titegroup 4.2 at 1.155 was also extremely light. Switching it to 1.130 made a significant difference. I settled at about 1.140 and stuck with that..
     
  9. tlafrance

    tlafrance
    Expand Collapse
    Missing AZ

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2001
    895
    0
    Location:
    Connecticut
    1.130-1.135 on ANY RN profile projectile.

    Tom
     
  10. XDRoX

    XDRoX
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2009
    6,144
    1,804
    Location:
    San Diego
    If it fit in a case gauge then I doubt it caused the problem. I have loaded from 1.130 to 1.165 without issues. My guess is your charge was to light. It couldn't hurt to drop your OAL a little though. I load all my 115 RN to 1.140 FWIW and they perform great.
    The 26 has a pretty stiff spring IMO, so a low charge may be the culprit.
     
  11. ron59

    ron59
    Expand Collapse
    Bustin Caps

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    6,927
    20
    Location:
    Smyrna, GA
    Well duh.... decreasing the OAL while maintaining the same amount of powder increases pressure. You're putting the SAME amount of powder into a smaller "space" (decreasing OAL pushes the bottom of the bullet further into the case).

    So yes, you're increasing the pressure, and thus increasing the recoil.

    When you made the significant of a jump in OAL, I would have dropped powder some and then retested with a chrono.
     
  12. fredj338

    fredj338
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    21,475
    825
    Location:
    so.cal.
    Well yes & no. Pressure will certainly increase as the bullet is seated deeper, but pressure are NOT the cause for increased recoil, velocity is. Yes, usually as pressures go up, vel also go up, but not always. I can reach max pressure in a 9mm w/ uberfast powders & still be far from the recoil of the same bullet going 100fps faster w/ slower powder causng less pressures.:dunno:
     
    #12 fredj338, Apr 7, 2010
    Last edited: Apr 7, 2010
  13. Colorado4Wheel

    Colorado4Wheel
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2006
    14,898
    151
    Location:
    CO
    Same velocity and fast powder will have lower percieved recoil then a slow powder.
     
  14. fredj338

    fredj338
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    21,475
    825
    Location:
    so.cal.
    Keep in mind that case gages do NOT measure OAL as much as headspace & cartridge spec diameter. There is no rifling to engage so your bbl has to be used as final gage for proper OAL.
     
  15. XDRoX

    XDRoX
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2009
    6,144
    1,804
    Location:
    San Diego
    I did not know this. Thanks Fred.
     
  16. fredj338

    fredj338
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    21,475
    825
    Location:
    so.cal.
    Yep, you magazine design & chamber/rifle in YOUR bbl are what determine max OAL. A case gage is great, but not definative. Always setup usiog the bbl as a gage, then use the case gage as final spot or final check to make sure you have proper crimp & sizing.
     
    #16 fredj338, Apr 7, 2010
    Last edited: Apr 7, 2010
  17. Colorado4Wheel

    Colorado4Wheel
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2006
    14,898
    151
    Location:
    CO
    If you are a case gauge'r the process works like this.

    1) Determine correct max OAL using your barrel. Then load a little bit shorter to insure normal oal length variations don't cause any issues in use.
    2) Load the ammo and check OAL/weight as you go and as any safe reloader would do.
    3) Case gauge the ammo, use your finger to check for high primers
    4) Put the ammo in plastic boxes.
    5) Final visual inspection of primers and length while in box.
    4) Inspect
     
  18. fredj338

    fredj338
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    21,475
    825
    Location:
    so.cal.
    You are good Steve!:supergrin:
     
  19. Patrick Graham

    Patrick Graham
    Expand Collapse
    Footlong Jr.

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2001
    1,953
    0
    Location:
    Kokomo Indiana
    I'm seating my Berry's 115 RN loads to 1.14".

    I haven't had a failure to feed and chamber yet.
     
  20. Colorado4Wheel

    Colorado4Wheel
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2006
    14,898
    151
    Location:
    CO
    Well, I did get two #4's the last one is just a mistake.