close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

ACR revamp sheds 1.8 lbs and quick change barrel

Discussion in 'Black Rifle Forum' started by humanguerrilla, Oct 17, 2011.


  1. humanguerrilla

    humanguerrilla
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2006
    2,735
    0
    Location:
    the woods
  2. crazymoose

    crazymoose
    Expand Collapse
    Nonentity

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2005
    4,417
    36
    This might save the design. I've thought the QC barrel nut was a waste of weight and an unnecessary capability from day one, and it has proven to cause some zero issues, as well. Also, the new lower opens up a lot of ergonomic options.
     

  3. AK_Stick

    AK_Stick
    Expand Collapse
    AAAMAD
    1. Glock Talk's Drunk Squad

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2004
    16,842
    596
    Location:
    Alaska, again (for now)
    I rather like the QC barrel function as I could have a 6.8 and 5.56 in the same gun.


    Just wish they'd actually gotten the damn gun right. Its been ********* since Magpul gave it to bush-hampster.
     
  4. crazymoose

    crazymoose
    Expand Collapse
    Nonentity

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2005
    4,417
    36
    I think they could have retained a quick change function with something like the mechanism the SCAR uses. The tool-less setup was what I had a problem with. My feeling is that if you're going to carry an extra barrel, bolt, ammo, and mags, a small torque wrench isn't too cumbersome to also carry.
     
  5. M&P15T

    M&P15T
    Expand Collapse
    Beard One

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    20,554
    2,720
    Location:
    Arlington, VA.
    Interesting. The article mentioned a carbine-length gas system. Are we to understand this version of the ACR is DI?
     
  6. WoodenPlank

    WoodenPlank
    Expand Collapse
    Who?

    Joined:
    May 15, 2010
    7,958
    3
    Location:
    NW Florida
    One of the photos clearly showed the front end of a piston system. I assume that it's just a shorter gas piston system, and similar or identical length to a DI carbine system.

    Am I the only one that finds magnesium as an odd choice for a lower receiver material?
     
  7. cyrsequipment

    cyrsequipment
    Expand Collapse
    Angry

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2004
    1,693
    0
    Location:
    Maine
    No, no you're not...:dunno:
     
  8. Mayhem like Me

    Mayhem like Me
    Expand Collapse
    Semper Paratus

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2001
    16,888
    2,474
    Location:
    Behind the Green door
    Having been in on the project I can tell you that your information is skewed.. The Magpul offering was not ready for mass production AT ALL.. And quite a bit of effort and testing went into the Bushmaster ACR to make it a viable platform.. If Magpul could have pulled it off they would have.. there is a reason they took the money and ran.

    ACR marketed to civilian gun owners Quick change barrel and other stuff..marketing for stuff consumers want..
    Mailitary version has no need for Quick change and for once they listened to the professional they have been consulting with.
     
    #8 Mayhem like Me, Oct 18, 2011
    Last edited: Oct 18, 2011
  9. Mayhem like Me

    Mayhem like Me
    Expand Collapse
    Semper Paratus

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2001
    16,888
    2,474
    Location:
    Behind the Green door
    At roughly 2/3rds the weight and very competritive in cost why not...
     
  10. nastytrigger

    nastytrigger
    Expand Collapse
    Mediocre Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2005
    2,241
    0
    Location:
    Indiana
    Any price change too?
     
  11. AK_Stick

    AK_Stick
    Expand Collapse
    AAAMAD
    1. Glock Talk's Drunk Squad

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2004
    16,842
    596
    Location:
    Alaska, again (for now)

    Honestly, the military has no need for an ACR, so thats a dog that doesn't hunt. This gun was never anything more than a cool looking rifle for civilian shooters and possibly at best, some police. It was never, and will never be a contender for military service.


    However, I never said that the product was ready when magpul had it, but bush-hampster ****** it up before they released it by making several stupid choices in the way they set it up before they released it, and the result was the almost across the board flop that it was.



    And Crazy, I agree, I just wish they'd stuck with something short of changing out whole uppers.
     
  12. Mayhem like Me

    Mayhem like Me
    Expand Collapse
    Semper Paratus

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2001
    16,888
    2,474
    Location:
    Behind the Green door
    Trust me, dealing with corporate types who think they know what you need/want is infuriating.
    The Masada as an original concept was a very good idea.

    And I disagree that a new more effective rifle is not needed, a true intermediate caliber along the lines of a 6.8 or 7mm short could be a very viable alternative for what is issued now, sadly, the way procurment trials are run and the amount of people that have their hands in the pie makes the water very murky for "improved" weapons.
     
  13. AK_Stick

    AK_Stick
    Expand Collapse
    AAAMAD
    1. Glock Talk's Drunk Squad

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2004
    16,842
    596
    Location:
    Alaska, again (for now)
    Oh dude, I'm not saying a new IMC carbine or rifle wouldn't be the cats ass, but the Army isn't going that way, atleast not right now. And when they do, they won't even offer a sideways glance at the ACR, not that its right or doesn't deserve a shot, but because the winner is already per-ordained.

    If we do get a new rifle, it will be the SCAR-L. The writing is on the wall. It did far too well with the Rangers and SF/AWG.
     
  14. Mayhem like Me

    Mayhem like Me
    Expand Collapse
    Semper Paratus

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2001
    16,888
    2,474
    Location:
    Behind the Green door
    They(SCAR )are very nice I have an enhanced ACR for my efforts with a few tweaks and a teamate has a SCAR, They both shoot about the same with the SCAR getting the nod for lightweight ergonomics is split for me I dont like thae SCAR reciprocating handle,,, but I have ordered two Heavy SCAR for special use.

    The remmingtion with a short tube in 6.8 is a real deal bang stick....
     
  15. AK_Stick

    AK_Stick
    Expand Collapse
    AAAMAD
    1. Glock Talk's Drunk Squad

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2004
    16,842
    596
    Location:
    Alaska, again (for now)
    I have absolutely no doubts. I would love a factory SBR 6.8 ACR. I'd be on that like a fat kid on a cupcake.
     
  16. M&P15T

    M&P15T
    Expand Collapse
    Beard One

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    20,554
    2,720
    Location:
    Arlington, VA.
    I'm getting the impression that version may not be made available (with a 16" barrel) for us civies.
     
  17. Mayhem like Me

    Mayhem like Me
    Expand Collapse
    Semper Paratus

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2001
    16,888
    2,474
    Location:
    Behind the Green door
    I can tell you that I am 99.99999 percent sure you will never be able to purchase the Remmington version.........................legally.
     
  18. KalashniKEV

    KalashniKEV
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2003
    6,391
    3
    Location:
    NoVA
    I handled the rifle in the pics. It wasn't really that amazing.

    WHY the one sided selector??
     
  19. M&P15T

    M&P15T
    Expand Collapse
    Beard One

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    20,554
    2,720
    Location:
    Arlington, VA.
    There were problems with the original selector's dual sided nature. When manipulating it on one side with one's dominant hand's thumb, the other side would hit the shooter's hand above their index finger.

    I'm willing to bet the selector is easy to change from one side to the other, giving it an ambidextrous nature, without that particular issue.


    Since you got to paw at it, was it a short-barreled version? It looks like it in the pictures.
     
  20. M&P15T

    M&P15T
    Expand Collapse
    Beard One

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    20,554
    2,720
    Location:
    Arlington, VA.

    The better question upon reflection, is will Bushmaster adopt some of those positive changes in their version? I handled an enhanced ACR, and that sucker was heavy!! This Remmington version is the one that should be offered to us poor civilian folks.

    Of course the price is the real deal-breaker.
     
Loading...
Similar Threads Forum Date
Quick Change to .223 Reloading Jan 6, 2013
SBR Caliber and Barrel Length Change GATE NFA/Class III Apr 14, 2011
Hornady quick change bushing Reloading Aug 5, 2010
Quick Change The Lighter Side Jan 11, 2010
barrel change Band of Glockers Oct 4, 2007
Duty Gear at CopsPlus