close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Talk

Why should YOU join our Glock forum?

  • Converse with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Learn about the latest hunting products
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.

ACP vs GAP ballistics

Discussion in 'The Bull Dawgs Club' started by jmoln, Jan 11, 2011.

  1. jmoln

    jmoln

    336
    0
    Dec 20, 2002
    Georgia and Alabama
    Its been a quiet night so here is a discussion starter. I thought I wanted a .44 revolver for my next gun. I quickly decided I did not like shooting .44 magnum with a lightweight revolver (Taurus Tracker) and that a heavy S&W didn't fit the primary hiking application. Realizing I was going to use only .44 Specials I started to compare ballistics and came up with these numbers from the Speer website. Of course I have them all plotted in excel but can't figure out how to post that and why can't I get these numbers to line up? (I've attached a pdf of the plot)


    Speer Gold Dot Ballistics fps ftlbs

    44 mag 240 gr 1400 1044
    44 sp 200 gr 875 340
    45 ACP 5" 230 gr 890 404
    45 ACP 5" 185 gr 1050 453
    45 ACP 4" SB 230 gr 820 343
    45 GAP 4" 200 gr 970 418
    45 GAP 4" 185 gr 1090 488

    When I saw the low energy numbers of the 44sp I started to compare the two .45 numbers that I know. Here are my presuppositions along with unexpected findings . . .
    - ignoring the platform question, revolver vs auto or even which auto
    - handloading is not an option at this time
    - the potential application excludes grizzlies so .44mag is not required
    - heavy grain .44 or .45 is preferred over smaller calibers
    - all .45's exceeded the .44 special energy numbers
    - barrel length is very important to ACP
    - ACP does much better with 5" than 4"
    - my 4.25" 1911 is equal to the .44 special (ok but not good)
    - the energy numbers imply an efficiency advantage for the GAP
    - the loadings wring more energy out of a 4" bbl in GAP than ACP
    - I could go for a full size 1911 or since I used to own a G38 maybe its time to come back

    Your thoughts?
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Jan 12, 2011

  2. jmoln

    jmoln

    336
    0
    Dec 20, 2002
    Georgia and Alabama
    Anyone out there have my old G38, serial number HCG900? I know its changed hands at least once since I sold it.
     
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2011
  3. dbarry

    dbarry Silver Member

    1,227
    159
    Feb 15, 2010
    the Buckeye state
    somebody gonna post that pfunny icon with the guy eat'n popcorn??? :O)
     
  4. Soon. Here we go again.








    :wave:













    :popcorn:
     
  5. dbarry

    dbarry Silver Member

    1,227
    159
    Feb 15, 2010
    the Buckeye state
    nice!
     

  6. Who the hell made such a stupid chart?

    Going back to grammer school days, the Y-axis is the speed. The higher up you go on the chart , the faster.

    X-axis is just a list of different rounds. WTF does connecting the dots do? You need a "bar" graph for this.



    Sorry, just vented a bit. Ooh, I feel better.
     
  7. burgherdude

    burgherdude

    55
    0
    Jan 18, 2006
    How funny! When I opened this thread I was actually eating a bag of Jolly Time popcorn! :supergrin:
     
  8. jmoln

    jmoln

    336
    0
    Dec 20, 2002
    Georgia and Alabama
    Ok, I'm back to defend my thesis. Attached is your basic bar chart. The independent axis is still the round, the dependent axis is velocity and energy. The main point of the chart is to compare how energy varies with respect to various bullet calibers and weights. One of my baseline assumptions (after bullet placement) is that energy is the primary consideration with caliber being a very close second.

    Remember I started this discussion with a decision to try out a .44 revolver. After deciding I didn't want to endure .44m energy with a lightweight weapon I went back to look at other rounds. A long time ago I decided against the .40S&W as being too snappy. I've also left behind .380 as too small and 9mm as relying too much on velocity. The .38 survives only because of a small J-frame.

    So, with the remaining rounds that have power equal or better than the .44 special I have either a 4" .357 or I move up to .45. This is where I learned something new. From this chart it appears that the ACP is biased/tuned toward the predominant 230gr 5" platform whereas the GAP does equal or better with a 4" barrel. Finally, back to my starting point - a lightweight platform with as much energy as I can handle. So I compare what I can get with a lightweight 4" or 5" 1911 versus the GAP with a lightweight Glock and I really see that I want to buy a Glock next.

    Once again an emotional decision backed up by science and logic. :cool:
     

    Attached Files:

  9. jwizzl497

    jwizzl497

    453
    0
    Mar 3, 2009
    Dude, this chart may be worst than the first. What data does Series 2 represent??
     
  10. jmoln

    jmoln

    336
    0
    Dec 20, 2002
    Georgia and Alabama
    you guys are worse than my college professors - always finding the weak spot. Just as with the first graph series 1 is muzzle velocity and series 2 is muzzle energy. See the attached chart.
     

    Attached Files:

  11. jwizzl497

    jwizzl497

    453
    0
    Mar 3, 2009
    I'm sorry but an axis of a graph does not usually represent two different measurements. If it's muzzle velocity, then it isn't muzzle energy. It just so happens that it's somewhat understandable becuase the size of the numbers are close.

    PS - I think the GAP and ACP are equal. I would only go with the gap if you prefer the smaller frame. That would be the only reason.
     
  12.  
    Last edited: Jan 13, 2011
  13. dudel

    dudel

    5,420
    951
    Dec 10, 2008
    Texas Hill Country
    I guess you've never seen a speed vs horsepower vs torque chart.

    Depends on how close they have to be to be "equal". Remington charts give GAP an edge. Small, but stll an edge.