close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Talk

Why should YOU join our Glock forum?

  • Converse with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Learn about the latest hunting products
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.

9 mm vs 40 S&W

Discussion in 'Caliber Corner' started by feathers73, Aug 3, 2010.

  1. feathers73

    feathers73

    176
    0
    May 21, 2007
    Southeast
    I have been trying to do some research on 9 mm versus 40 S&W. I know the debate will probably never be totally put to bed, but do you think a 9 mm 147 gr bonded bullet has a significant disadvantage over a 180 gr 40 S&W bonded bullet?
     
  2. cowboy1964

    cowboy1964

    19,675
    2,122
    Sep 4, 2009
    U.S.A.
    Significant? No. Slight? Probably. But in reality whichever you can shoot more accurately and faster and more confidently is the better choice.

    One way to look at it is both 147gr 9mm and 180gr .40 are going to go roughly the same velocity. Is the extra 0.045" in diameter and 33gr weight going to make a difference? Or will the lighter recoil, greater capacity, lower cost (allowing one to practice more) offset that advantage?

    All other things being equal, bigger and heavier bullets are better than small light ones. But nothing is ever equal in all other things.
     

    Last edited: Aug 3, 2010

  3. f150man

    f150man

    264
    0
    Jun 29, 2010
    Gee, this is like asking if you preferr Fords or Chevys.


    Myself, I'm a big bore man. 10mm, .45acp, etc. I've never seen a reason to own a 9mm. My main CCW weapon is a G23. It's a compromise in concealibility and firepower.

    So, why in the same size package would I want a 9mm when I could get a .40S&W?

    At the same time if you blast a BG with 4 or 5 9mm HPs and they all land in the COM area he will be dead.

    It doesn't matter if they are plain jane 115grs or if they are some super duper 147gr +P+ wonder bullet.

    J
     
  4. BadAndy

    BadAndy

    1,321
    0
    Oct 2, 2004
    Irmo, SC
    No. The .40 will make a slightly larger hole and possibly go a little deeper but there isn't a significant disadvantage with the 9mm.
     
  5. 2afreedom

    2afreedom

    1,333
    7
    May 6, 2007
    The South
    I would argue that the .40 has an advantage because it is a larger, heavier bullet. On the other hand a lot of people can shoot 9mm more accurately due to it having less recoil, especially when used in smaller guns. In the end I would pick the one that I shot best and not lose any sleep over it.
     
  6. rome2240sw

    rome2240sw GLOCKIN4LIFE

    213
    0
    Jun 5, 2010
    columbia, SC
    what he said
     
  7. fredj338

    fredj338

    21,662
    898
    Dec 22, 2004
    so.cal.
    The 9mm/147gr & 40/180gr have the same SD. If both are of the same construction, they will penetrate about the same. So let platform be your guide. I like 9mm in smaller guns, 40 in full size guns. I only get 10rds, I like the biggest holes I can get, even if they are marginally bigger.
     
  8. bigdollars

    bigdollars

    1,283
    0
    Oct 16, 2007
    Massachusetts
    you are better off going with lighter rounds. I suggest the 115 or the 127 for 9mm and the 155 or 165 for .40. 180 does not perform as well (expand as well) as the others and the 147 is just to powerful for a 9mm.
     
  9. JBP55

    JBP55

    9,639
    247
    Mar 4, 2007
    Louisiana
    Most LEA's go with heavy for caliber for more penetration and less perceived recoil.
     
  10. English

    English

    4,585
    42
    Dec 24, 2005
    London
    I would put it the other wqy round. I think that the 9mm 147gr bullet has a significan disadvatage relative to just about any .40S&W bullet other than ball and,for that matter, relative to good 115gr and 125gr 9mm bullets.

    English
     
  11. Eagle22

    Eagle22

    597
    0
    Feb 6, 2009
    Raleigh NC
    I agree
     
  12. fredj338

    fredj338

    21,662
    898
    Dec 22, 2004
    so.cal.
    This tells me you need to do more shooting.:upeyes: BUllet design has everything to do w/ performance, more so than bullet wt. You can certainly make a good 180gr JHP or a poor 115gr 9mm. Depending on your interpetation of "power", most 147gr 9mm are actually on the anemic side of the "power" curve.
     
    Last edited: Aug 4, 2010
  13. happyguy

    happyguy Man, I'm Pretty

    Either one will do just fine if you do your part. The "your part" is what we need to work on.

    Regards,
    Happyguy :)
     
  14. bowtie454

    bowtie454

    703
    21
    Jul 17, 2009
    I would agree with you, but something tells me we don't see eye to eye :)
     
  15. bigdollars

    bigdollars

    1,283
    0
    Oct 16, 2007
    Massachusetts
    http://glocktalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1226930 Mas Ayoob agrees to stay away from the 147. they are not as effective.
     
  16. bmylesk

    bmylesk

    778
    0
    Jul 2, 2010
    SLC, UT
    im just a thin 150lbs. 6ft tall guy and i shoot a G23 .40, 180gr JHP ammo. less velocity i know, but i don't need personal protection at 100 yrds. i say choose what you want to shoot and practice religiously with it. for me, at first it took getting use to, but now i can hit a bulls-eye at 15-20ft away consistently. i choose what i have because of penetration, and damage. personally the 180gr could have a less recoil.
     
    Last edited: Aug 4, 2010
  17. granitemonkey

    granitemonkey

    107
    0
    Dec 29, 2009
    Richmond, Va
    According to what I read Ayoob said stay away from the old low-tech 147gr hollowpoints. He approves of the new high-tech premium rounds IE; HST's, Ranger-T's and Gold Dots which all of those I use. That being said, I also like all of the above in any flavor offered.
     
  18. fredj338

    fredj338

    21,662
    898
    Dec 22, 2004
    so.cal.
    First you were saying the 147gr were too powerfull, now it's not as effective! Which is it my man?:dunno: Besides, anything written by CH carries about as much weight as anything written here.
     
    Last edited: Aug 4, 2010
  19. BadAndy

    BadAndy

    1,321
    0
    Oct 2, 2004
    Irmo, SC
    I loaded some 147gr XTPs to 900fps and they expanded nicely to .56". They also penetrated three 1 gallon water jugs with ease.