close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

.357sig Pressure vs Setback

Discussion in 'Caliber Corner' started by dkf, Mar 23, 2011.


  1. dkf

    dkf
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2010
    5,428
    121
  2. Glolt20-91

    Glolt20-91
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    3,932
    64
    Location:
    Arizona Territory
    That's a very informative graph, thanks for sharing. :thumbsup:

    Bob :cowboy:
     

  3. cowboy1964

    cowboy1964
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2009
    19,448
    1,993
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    Interesting, I never know that at some point the powder compresses and pressure actually decreases because it doesn't all ignite. Although granted it's a small decrease.

    Is this chart available for any other calibers?
     
  4. fredj338

    fredj338
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    21,511
    840
    Location:
    so.cal.
    That anomaly would vary from caliber to caliber & w/ diff powders. The graph would NOT be the same for say 9mm, 40 or 45acp.
     
  5. WiskyT

    WiskyT
    Expand Collapse
    Malcontent

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    11,682
    1
    Location:
    North Carolina
    What's interesting is that at no time does the pressure exceed proof levels. That kind of puts a damper on the whole setback causing KB theory.
     
  6. fredj338

    fredj338
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    21,511
    840
    Location:
    so.cal.
    Again, caliber & powder specific. That is one graph for one caliber & one powder. Also keep in mnd @ 0.940", there is likely zero neck tension & the pressure is relieved some for that reason. You can clearly see signiicant pressure increases @ 1.040"-1.030". ENough for a KB, probably not, but 10K over pressure is not to be taken lightly, especially w/ handloaded brass fired maybe one time to many.
     
    #6 fredj338, Mar 23, 2011
    Last edited: Mar 23, 2011
  7. WiskyT

    WiskyT
    Expand Collapse
    Malcontent

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    11,682
    1
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Agreed. I would like to see similar graphs of a particular caliber...cough! 40SW...cough! Also, I agree that setback isn't something to be desired. However, we hear so much about the dramatic pressure increase, and in this case the bullet is almost flush with the case mouth and the presure isn't high enough for catastrophic failure.
     
  8. fredj338

    fredj338
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    21,511
    840
    Location:
    so.cal.
    Again, loss of case neck tension causes incomplete combustion w/ slow powders used in the 357sig. I have seen this w/ H110 in magnums & little or no crimp, you'll get a hangfire or really low pressure event. I doubt that you would get sim results w/ say, my fav, TG in the 40 & 180gr bullets deep seated.:shocked:
     
  9. WiskyT

    WiskyT
    Expand Collapse
    Malcontent

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    11,682
    1
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Yeah, but there is only so much energy in a given powder charge, no matter how you handle it. A light charge of fast powder has a limit as to how much pressure it can produce even in a completely cloased system (a "bullet" that doesn't even move). Id like to see a graph of 40SW with dramatically reduced OAL and a worst case scenario of a short OAL and a bullet that doesn't even move out of the way. Not that a graph like that is likely to pop up any time soon, but I wonder if the ballistics labs have run tests like that.
     
  10. fredj338

    fredj338
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    21,511
    840
    Location:
    so.cal.
    Well if I could just find a cheap 9mm & 40 bbl for my TC, then I would pop for the RSI pressure trace system.:whistling:
     
  11. dkf

    dkf
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2010
    5,428
    121
  12. PghJim

    PghJim
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    1,935
    49
    Location:
    Pittsburgh
    The pressure issue with the 357Sig is interesting and bullet setback is something I check for all of the time. Has anyone heard of a KB caused by set back over-pressurization? Just wonder how often it is happening.
     
  13. WiskyT

    WiskyT
    Expand Collapse
    Malcontent

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    11,682
    1
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Fred:
    I'm surprised you don't already have a full internal ballistics lab at this point. Maybe we should tell Jack everyone has one so he'll get one.

    DFK:
    Thanks for bringing this topic up.

    PGH:
    It's hard to tell how many KB's are due to setback. It all ends up being conjecture. All we really have is broken guns and burst cases. Maybe a lab could figure these things out, but these things rarely get that far. If and when they do, the results aren't made public, or at least I never get to see them.

    My own personal conjecture is that KB's are due overwhelmingly to overcharged loads. This requires the admission of human error, which requires humility, which is rare.
     
  14. dkf

    dkf
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2010
    5,428
    121
    Found some more articles.

    My tests with Speer GD 23918 in my G33 did not concur with the article in the link below. After 3 chamberings the OAL went from 1.125" on a new bullet to 1.090" after being chambered 3 times. After two chamberings there was a minimum of .010" setback.

    http://www.handguninfo.com/Archive/www.Pete-357.com/factory.setback.chart.htm

    Found some .40 articles also.

    http://www.greent.com/40Page/ammo/40/180gr.htm

    ^ Notice the massive pressure spikes of the .40 with bullet setback. Those numbers seem almost too high to be true. But if they are true I can see why a KB could happen.

    http://www.thegunzone.com/glock/setback.html
     
    #14 dkf, Mar 24, 2011
    Last edited: Mar 24, 2011
  15. WiskyT

    WiskyT
    Expand Collapse
    Malcontent

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    11,682
    1
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Regarding the second two links, I don't put any faith in them. One has been shown to have manipulated his "evidence", or refused to admit it was eroneous, and the other I have met personally on several occasions and he is a buffoon and a braggard.
     
    #15 WiskyT, Mar 24, 2011
    Last edited: Mar 24, 2011