close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

.357 SIG vs .40 S&W

Discussion in 'Caliber Corner' started by TommyV, Sep 30, 2010.


Tags:
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. TommyV

    TommyV
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2010
    67
    0
    Location:
    Texas
    I own a G22 40 S&W. I have considered getting a .357 SIG barrel for it but was looking at the ammunition available and saw some Cor-Bon 135gr .40 S&W JHP that appears to have similar ballistics to what I read about the 125gr .357 SIG.

    It states:
    Muzzle velocity: 1325 fps.
    Muzzle energy: 526 ft/lbs.

    Is there anything about the .357 SIG ammo that would make it stand out over a 135gr .40 S&W like the Cor-Bon mentioned above?

    Thanks
     

    Wanna kill these ads? We can help!
  2. cowboy1964

    cowboy1964
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2009
    18,669
    1,264
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    For self-defense I'm of the personal opinion that 135gr is too light for .40. Sectional density is pretty low.
     

  3. TommyV

    TommyV
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2010
    67
    0
    Location:
    Texas
    I am not really wanting to know what the optimal bullet is for the .40. What I am wondering is how these two bullets I mentioned compare to each other being that the ballistic measurements are nearly the same. The .40 135gr and .357 125gr.

    You do mention sectional density which I imagine is higher in the 125gr .357 SIG. How significant of a difference does that make between these two specific bullets?
     
    #3 TommyV, Sep 30, 2010
    Last edited: Sep 30, 2010
  4. Glolt20-91

    Glolt20-91
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    3,927
    64
    Location:
    Arizona Territory
    The 125gr Gold Dot is one of the better "go to" bullets in .357 SIG for personal defense, based upon its high velocity design and bonded construction.

    While the 135gr Sierra JHP might be good for light game/vermin; it's not in the same league as the 125gr Gold Dot IMO.

    Bob :cowboy:
     
    #4 Glolt20-91, Sep 30, 2010
    Last edited: Sep 30, 2010
  5. NonPCnraRN

    NonPCnraRN
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2010
    256
    1
    The SD of a 125 gr .357 cal bullet is .140. The SD of a 135 gr .40 cal bullet is .121. To approximate the SD of the 125 gr .357 cal bullet you would need a 165 gr .40 cal bullet with a SD of .147. As an aside, the SDs of the 180 gr .40 cal bullet and the 230 gr .451 bullet are .161 and .162 respectively.
     
    #5 NonPCnraRN, Sep 30, 2010
    Last edited: Sep 30, 2010
  6. fredj338

    fredj338
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    20,965
    587
    Location:
    so.cal.
    Yes, SecDen puts the 125gr/357 load ahead of any 135gr/40 load. Then add in that most 125gr/357sig loads are bonded, the bullet is not coming apart. Not so for the 135gr/40 loads. That bullet will frag if it hits bone or heavy muscle, limiting penetration further & maybe not getting the job done.:dunno:
    SD means that w/ two bullets of sim construction, the higher SD will penetrate further. The SD changes as the bullet expands, so if it starts out poor & gets worse, expansion is severly compromised.
     
    #6 fredj338, Sep 30, 2010
    Last edited: Sep 30, 2010
  7. TommyV

    TommyV
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2010
    67
    0
    Location:
    Texas

    Well this makes sense. I am carrying 165gr now in my G22. Also aside from poor expansion, I just read that the projectile travels through the air better with a higher sectional density.

    What is the formula to calculate this?

    Also just a suggestion, you may way to consider using something else to abbreviate that as SD typically refers to self defense on most gun forums that I have seen.
     
  8. SDGlock23

    SDGlock23
    Expand Collapse
    Glockoholic

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2005
    6,456
    110
    Location:
    Under the dome on the flat earth
    There is a formula I'm certain, but you can find sectional density calculators online, it's way easier. Essentially, if two bullets are nearly the same weight, but one is a smaller caliber, the smaller caliber will have higher sectional density which will cause it to penetrate better than the larger bullet of similar weight. With that being said, I've heard the 135gr .40 is a very good fight stopper.
     
  9. TommyV

    TommyV
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2010
    67
    0
    Location:
    Texas
    Yea I like formulas but I just found a calculator that will work for now. I understand that a smaller bullet of equal weight has greater density. I just want to be able to put exact numbers on it to compare. I don't plan on stopping any fights with my Glock :shocked:

    One thing I want to add is for some 9mm ammo I have. It is the Magtech First Defense 92.6gr Solid Copper HP.

    Muzzle Velocity: 1330 fps
    Muzzle Energy: 364 ft/lbs

    Now I saw this in a test with a few other popular HP 9mm that was posted online. It was up against still like Gold Dot 124 gr, Hydra Shok and others. the reviewer commented on how the penetration was one of the top in the bunch and the picture of the expanded projectile had beautiful uniform expansion like a flower. I wish I had a link but I will try to find it.

    I was very surprised how well it did against the other ones it was up against simply because the weight was so low.

    Magtech makes a 130gr .40 S&W exactly the same.

    Muzzle Velocity: 1190 fps
    Muzzle Energy: 409 ft/lbs
     
    #9 TommyV, Sep 30, 2010
    Last edited: Sep 30, 2010
  10. Glockbuster

    Glockbuster
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2005
    967
    1
    Location:
    Middle America
    Since there has been no mention of accuracy yet (at least I think there has not), there will be no comparison--the 357 sig groupings will be better all around, and flatter trajectory.Nitpicking, but true nonetheless.
     
  11. TommyV

    TommyV
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2010
    67
    0
    Location:
    Texas
    What makes the 357 flatter? I thought it was velocity but the specs on the first cartridge I mention s was over 1300 fps which is equal to the 357 round.
     
  12. NonPCnraRN

    NonPCnraRN
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2010
    256
    1
    Here is the Ballistician's Corner of the Beartooth Bullet website for sectional density and other formulas frequently used in discussing bullet effectiveness. http://www.beartoothbullets.com/rescources/index.htm

    I realize that SD can stand for self defense but in the context of the subject I didn't think using SD for sectional density would cause any confusion. I am a member of SingleActions.com, Paco Kelly's Leverguns.com, MarlinOwners, LevergunLovers, SASS, and when talking about bullet characteristics SD infers sectional density as BC stands for ballistic coefficient. I will keep your suggestion in mind if the topic is self defense. Maybe I should have done as Cowboy1964 and actually spelled the words to avoid confusion. I can easily confuse myself so it is easy to see how shorthand can be misleading to others.
     
    #12 NonPCnraRN, Sep 30, 2010
    Last edited: Sep 30, 2010
  13. TommyV

    TommyV
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2010
    67
    0
    Location:
    Texas
    Thank you!

    Yea I am not trying to be the grammar police. I just thought it meant self defense when I first started reading your post but then figured it out pretty quickly.
     
  14. fredj338

    fredj338
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    20,965
    587
    Location:
    so.cal.
    The "flat trajectory" is really just marketing hype. All pistol rounds are "falt" out to 50yds. You can see an advantage when you push it ot 100yds, but really, most guys can barely hit @ 7yds, so flat trajectory means nothing in self def (SD) rounds.:supergrin:
    SecDen changes w/ bullet mat'l. so wt is not the soul indicater now w/ mono metal bullets. It is possible to get sim penetration w/ the lighter monometal bullets.
     
    #14 fredj338, Sep 30, 2010
    Last edited: Sep 30, 2010
Loading...
Similar Threads Forum Date
.40 S&W--> .357 Sig? Carry Issues Feb 11, 2014
Recoil: .357 Sig vs. .40 S&W at the range Caliber Corner Oct 20, 2012
.40s&w vs .357 SIG Caliber Corner Jan 22, 2012
40 s&w vs. 357 sig Caliber Corner Sep 30, 2011
357 sig VS 40 S&W TOP GUNS *357 Sig* Club Sep 20, 2011
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Duty Gear at CopsPlus