close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

.22MAG Revolver - Charter, S&W or Taurus

Discussion in 'General Firearms Forum' started by Irelander, Apr 16, 2012.


  1. Irelander

    Irelander
    Expand Collapse
    Glocker

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2006
    509
    0
    Location:
    Seneca, PA
    I have been looking around for a snubnose .22MAG revolver mostly for plinking but could be a decent pocket gun. I had my heart set on a S&W 351PD but besides not being able to find one anywhere, I've heard of some issues with them. I also have been looking at the Taurus 941SS2 or the Charter Pathfinder. Could any of you guys with experience with these 3 revolvers give me your comments and advice. I'm looking for owner experiences.

    Please don't tell me that I should get a .38SP instead.
     

    Wanna kill these ads? We can help!
  2. Bruce M

    Bruce M
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2010
    38,553
    9,264
    Location:
    S FL
    Based on the price of .22 Mag ammunition if I were in the market for a .22 mag revolver I would be looking for one with a .22 lr cylinder also.
     

  3. Bilbo Bagins

    Bilbo Bagins
    Expand Collapse
    Slacked jawed

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    11,211
    1
    .22 mag is still about the same price or a little cheaper then 9mm and is still cheaper than every other caliber except .22lr. :dunno:

    In .22wmr DA revolver all have issues with heavy triggers. I don't know too much about the Charter arms, but that is a 6 shot, and the S&W 351C is a 7 shot while the Taurus 941 is a 8 shot. some 941 have issues with the cylinders locking up after heavy use. I would go with either the S&W 351C (the PD model is too expensive) or the Charter Arms.
     
    #3 Bilbo Bagins, Apr 16, 2012
    Last edited: Apr 16, 2012
  4. Irelander

    Irelander
    Expand Collapse
    Glocker

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2006
    509
    0
    Location:
    Seneca, PA
    I don't think this gun will get heavy use. Most likely it will end up being my wife's gun. I also want an exposed hammer so the 351C is out.
     
    #4 Irelander, Apr 16, 2012
    Last edited: Apr 16, 2012
  5. Bruce M

    Bruce M
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2010
    38,553
    9,264
    Location:
    S FL
    I agree .22WMR is less expensive than 9mm but to me at least, it is still not in the same price arena as .22lr. ANd I guess maybe part of it is because I have always thought one of these would be a nice addition

    [​IMG]
     
  6. ithaca_deerslayer

    ithaca_deerslayer
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2000
    18,160
    2,305
    Location:
    Upstate NY, USA
    I almost bought a 317 snubby. It is only a .22lr, but why not? Also thought about the Beretta bobcat .22lr little semi.

    Decided to go with the 63 stainless steel .22lr j frame 3" (don't have it yet). Also had thought about a larger 617, so the 63 seemed a compromise :)

    No matter what you find, someone can surely order what you want. But none of those S&W are cheap.
     
  7. bac1023

    bac1023
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2004
    101,887
    2,467
    Location:
    PA
    :agree:
     
  8. ithaca_deerslayer

    ithaca_deerslayer
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2000
    18,160
    2,305
    Location:
    Upstate NY, USA
    What issues have you heard of them?

    Any gun make/model ever made has more than a dozen guys with stories of them being defective or hunks of junk.

    If you happen across what those guys say, it will taint your view of the product. Otherwise you might buy the gun and be happy as a clam with it.

    What is lacking is any statistical perspective. Also lacking is the inside knowledge of older problems that the company has since fixed.

    I gotta believe that anything Smith and Wesson keeps for sale, and not on recall, is worth the likelihood that it is a good gun. Especially revolvers :)
     
    #8 ithaca_deerslayer, Apr 16, 2012
    Last edited: Apr 16, 2012
  9. jkm

    jkm
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    May 21, 2011
    71
    0
    I've had a C-Arms Pathfinder for about 30 yrs. It's 22LR with a 3" bbl. Great little revolver. I don't know anything about the Smith or Taurus.
     
  10. cowboywannabe

    cowboywannabe
    Expand Collapse
    you savvy?

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2001
    21,002
    4,513
    Ive own a s&w, taurus, and charter arms before.

    S&w was the best, taurus was a good runner up except for the internal lock.

    The charter arms pathfinder i had was an old school 3" gun and a descent shooter.

    I can not risk my money on a new c.a. Gun without trying it out first.
     
  11. Wyoming

    Wyoming
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2007
    2,950
    1,198
    Location:
    Southwest Wyoming
    I have a S&W Model 651 and 650. Both are in stainless steel J frame. The 651 is 4" with adjustable sights and 650 is 3" with fix sights.

    The only issues I have is it get harder to eject the empties as you shoot. I take a cleaning brush with cleaner/lubricate and clean cylinder.

    These two don't get shot that much because they are part of J frame collection. If I'm plinking I take the 22's. If I'm packing I take 38/357's.

    Let us know how the 351PD works out. It is a J frame and I do collect them.:whistling:
     
  12. Irelander

    Irelander
    Expand Collapse
    Glocker

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2006
    509
    0
    Location:
    Seneca, PA
    Over on smith-wessonforum.com I read about a lot of guys having issues with flame cutting on the frame of the 351PD. The general consensus was that S&W "forgot" to put in a stainless steel bushing that protects the frame from flame cutting. There are also many reports of the 351PD having a less than enjoyable DA trigger pull and many reports of frequent trips back to S&W for service.

    I agree that my experience may be different and S&W may have worked out some of these issues but I have not heard that they have. I am a Glock man and am not used to maintenance and repairs on my guns.

    I'm pretty set on the 351PD but the all stainless Taurus 941 is tempting. I also like that it has adjustable sights.
     
    #12 Irelander, Apr 17, 2012
    Last edited: Apr 17, 2012
  13. Dawolf

    Dawolf
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2010
    1,147
    1
    Location:
    Arizona
    I have shot the Taurus and the trigger is horrible, the Charter Arms is heavy, the S&W nice and light, but very pricey. I like the Smith, but can't justify paying thayt much for 22.
     
  14. Wyoming

    Wyoming
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2007
    2,950
    1,198
    Location:
    Southwest Wyoming
    "Can't justify paying that much for a 22" statement always mystifies me. How can a manufacture cut cost on making a revolver? A 22 will get shot more and earn it's value.
     
  15. Irelander

    Irelander
    Expand Collapse
    Glocker

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2006
    509
    0
    Location:
    Seneca, PA
    I've been reading a little about the S&W 317 (.22LR). This J-frame sounds pretty good too. I've also been reading about the lack of benefits of a .22MAG over the .22LR in such a short barrel. I'm going to research it some more but it looks like the ballistics aren't much different between the .22LR and .22MAG out of a 2" barrel. The .22MAG barks a lot more but overall power doesn't seem much different until you reach 5" of barrel length. Then the benefits of .22MAG start to show. At least that is what I am reading. I am starting to think that a 317 loaded with 8 CCI Stingers would be just as good as a 351PD loaded with .22MAG.
     
  16. Bilbo Bagins

    Bilbo Bagins
    Expand Collapse
    Slacked jawed

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    11,211
    1
    Ahh but look at the price of a S&W .38 revolver like the 642 and the 442, then look at the price of the S&W rimfire revolvers like the the 317, the 63 and the 617. The price is almost double, sometimes more.

    I'm sorry but how can it be $300 more to make a 317, when the cylinder is not made of steel like the 642, but aluminum. Taurus, Ruger, Charter Arms (and others like Colt and Dan Wesson BACK IN THE DAY) have no problems making a .22lr revolver the same price as their centerfire counterparts. S&W does it because S&W can. They act like Sig Sauer sometimes.

    I know $300 to $500 difference in price can be made up with ammo cost, but that will take awhile, and why should you be forced to justify that when its not an issue with every other revolver manufacture.
     
    #16 Bilbo Bagins, Apr 17, 2012
    Last edited: Apr 18, 2012
  17. ithaca_deerslayer

    ithaca_deerslayer
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2000
    18,160
    2,305
    Location:
    Upstate NY, USA
    I haven't done the backyard tests myself, but that is my conclusion as well :)

    So for my own personal choice, I prefer to have the .22lr in a short barreled handgun instead of a .22mag.

    And for the record, I do have a plenty of .22mag ammo on hand. I have a Ruger 96/.22mag lever action carbine that I absolutely love. I have tested that against the .22lr in rifles, and it is far superior :)

    One thing I notice about the .22mag pistols at the range is that they are LOUD! Louder than a 9mm it seems (don't know if empirically true, but sure seems that way).
     
    #17 ithaca_deerslayer, Apr 17, 2012
    Last edited: Apr 17, 2012
  18. ithaca_deerslayer

    ithaca_deerslayer
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2000
    18,160
    2,305
    Location:
    Upstate NY, USA
    Cool, I'm going to look up the manufacturer's websites for some available new Colt and Dan Wesson revolvers!

    I'm optimistic on what I'll find. I love my Dan Wesson .44 mag, so it will be great to get a new one in .22!

    And I've always wanted a new Colt .22 revolver. Now is the time!

    Thanks for the tips :)
     
  19. Frog1

    Frog1
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2009
    211
    0
    Just got through shooting my new Taurus 991 4" .22 mag I got from Bud's on sale for $273.00. Double action is a little stiff. Single action is great. One chamber is a little rough which makes ejection of the empties a little stiff. I can clean that up pretty quick with a drill and bore brush. Fits my hand well, sights are very good, grip is nice. Overall, I am pretty happy with it for the price.
     
  20. Irelander

    Irelander
    Expand Collapse
    Glocker

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2006
    509
    0
    Location:
    Seneca, PA
    Thanks for the input Frog1.

    I am leaning towards the 317 (found one new for $564 shipped to my dealer, $594 when all said and done) but the Taurus 94 price point cannot be ignored.