close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Talk

Why should YOU join our Glock forum?

  • Converse with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Learn about the latest hunting products
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.

.17 HMR... Savage or Marlin?

Discussion in 'Rimfire Forum' started by Brent10mm, Apr 20, 2010.

  1. Brent10mm

    Brent10mm

    318
    0
    Apr 6, 2009
    Spo, W.A.
    Although I don't really need one, I'm thinking about adding it to the collection.
    A friend has the savage 17 hmr, basic blued, no accutrigger... and I really like the little caliber for some stupid reason. just a great truck gun.

    I have had in the past, a .22 magnum heavy blued Savage, and it was a shooter. They only thing I did not care for was the magazines... P.I.A.
    I handled the Marlin version yesterday, and the mag. design was much better... but the trigger was terribly heavy...

    I know both are pretty accurate guns, maybe edge to the savage, but I'm kinda stuck...

    -get a savage and deal with the mags, but have a great trigger
    or
    - get the marlin, have good mags, and shell out extra for a trigger job, or drop in...

    I'm leaning to the heavy SS synthetic stock version of either. if that matters?
    Any of those sweet 17 scopes, with bullet comp worth a damn btw...?
    or just get good reputable glass...?
     
  2. rscottk90

    rscottk90

    75
    0
    Mar 11, 2010
    Id get the savage, i love the 22lr with the accutrigger. I dont think the mags are tht bad...
    as far as glass http://www.muelleroptics.com/ havnt gotten a peice from them yet but my 204 im getting next week is gonna get a mueller. ive herd lots of great things and they have great prices. Compare their same size and power scopes to others and theres a price difference.
     


  3. Glocks&Ducs

    Glocks&Ducs

    4,051
    1
    Apr 24, 2004
    Unless you are shooting out past 150 yards all the time, the Sweet 17 scopes are a waste of money. The bullet compensation doesn't kick in until that point.

    I went with a Marlin myself. It just seemed a bit more refined than the Savage's I was looking at.

    Keep in mind that ammo prices can be quite high for a 17HMR. When it first came out, ammo was about $6.50 to $9 a box of 50 rounds. When I was looking for this last 17HMR, I noticed ammo was about $12 a box at most places and as high $17 for the same stuff. Luckily, my go to dealer came through with a case that worked out to about $10 per box.
     
  4. 2FNSLO

    2FNSLO

    91
    0
    Nov 10, 2007
    Southern OH
    I have the Savage. A little polishing on the mags fixed a lot of the problems for me. Clip a coil off the trigger spring and a good trigger gets even better. I have a Simmons pro hunter 6x18 scope on mine and it works pretty well. I also like the Mueller that's on my Savage in .308 though. For low cost scopes, I think the Mueller is a very good value. Most of the folks on RFC speak very highly of they as well.
     
  5. When I bought my .17 HMR it was the newest hottest thing in gun sales. I really wanted the Marlin but my dealer couldn't get through Marlin's preference system to get one, unless I wanted to order a couple of lever action center fire guns at the same time.

    But he could get the Savage 93R17FV in. This was pre acutrigger so I have the crummy mags and the crummy trigger. I also had to bed the action to get rid of some vertical stringing in my groups.

    But now I love the rifle. Great accuracy, consistently shoots 3/4" groups at 100 yards.

    For a $179 rifle with a $39.95 Tasco 6-24x scope it is a accuracy bargain.

    [​IMG]


    But, the new Marlin's have an improved trigger.
     
    Last edited: Apr 28, 2010
  6. sharpshooter

    sharpshooter Member Millennium Member

    1,847
    20
    Dec 25, 1999
    NV
    I have a Marlin and a Savage. Both have heavy blued barrels. Both are built like sturdy toys with metalwork and a feel that leaves a little to be desired, which is expected for the price.

    Savage- The AccuTrigger is great, but the plastic trigger guard is lame. The magazines feel flimbsy but they work fine. Reciever is drilled n tapped for scope bases.

    Marlin- I replaced the trigger with a RifleBasix and it's as good or a little better than the AccuTrigger. There are no plastic parts. Reciever has a dovetail milled for scope bases.

    Both are exeptionally accurate. Which do I prefer? I guess the Marlin but only because it has nicer wood.
     
  7. salvo

    salvo Pass the ammo

    704
    4
    Sep 1, 2000
    Vegas
    I went with the Marlin/RifleBasix, very accurate rifle!
     
  8. This Savage .17 HMR of my wife's is definately a shooter.

    Another +1 for Mueller, by the way.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]


    -Tim S.
     
  9. GlockPride

    GlockPride Glock 23

    4,573
    125
    Aug 21, 2006
    Just OK
    I'm a Savage fan myself. The accutrigger is hard to beat.
     
  10. Another Miller

    Another Miller prankster

    2,587
    0
    Apr 23, 2007
    Ohio
    I have a savage mako in 17hmr.My 12 yr old son tried it out,works for him too.It is very light and easy to carry back into the fields.

    This rifle shoulda came out a long time ago,Beat my Ruger 22 mag hands down. its absolutely a tack driver.