I emailed Mike McNett at DT about the terminal performance of this loading yesterday. Obviously we all realize hes a very busy man and in no way do I expect a prompt answer from him....so I will turn to the community of 10 ringers here for helpful answers until Mike has the time to respond. While I dont base things solely off of ordinance gelatin tests or wetpacks, I would like to get some sort of physical data involving the penetration of this load. Believe me when I say I know about the 25% deeper statements as well as the ones comparing penetration to the gold dots and golden sabers in slightly heavier weights but this is just reiterated from the same unproven sources. Any tests or experience with the 155gr. xpb with actual 4 legged critters or 10% ordinance would be fantastic. I would also like to know how the feeding reliability is in a G29 (mine eats everything so Im not too concerned, I just want to know from others as well) The barnes solid copper lines seem to hold up well at the higher velocities and are an approved loading for the .40sw, but there was some talk of slightly missing the 12" penetration mark, which to me is unacceptable as I personally prefer through and through penetration. The lighter weight concerns me slightly but I see a lot of potential for this load as an EDC if it can match the performance of the 165gr & 180gr. gold/golden loads. Any additional data will be much appreciated guys. Wanna kill these ads? We can help!