Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.
Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Religious Issues' started by DonGlock26, Aug 20, 2012.
Is this justice under Sharia law?
burn a book, get murdered for doing so....the muslim way now-a-days.
This is why we treasure the separation of church and state.
Actually it was not a book. It was some papers. The charges will probably get dropped after it blows over..
Since she was a Christian they probably were looking for something to get her for.
Just another example of why we as a world society nee to move past bronze age superstitions, and embrace the modern world.
The whole thing appears to be a false story, made up to get the community to support running out the christians. A common tactic - kind of a "Reichstag fire" thing...except that the Reichstag was actually burned and it seems likely that no Koran was.
It has all the hallmarks of manufactured outrage, including that it was spread by rumor and nobody is exactly sure what was done or who really saw it AND it appears to conveniently serve the purposes of a group trying to turn people against another group.
Really? The progressive UK paper- the Guardian is part of a Christian plot?
And what, accept social darwinism, eugenics, and a hedonic princple instead? I think you are missing the salient point that the collusion between religion and state is once again rearing its ugly head. Rather than attack all religion, the point should be the aborant thing it becomes when the state edorses a religion to the exclusion of all others.
First I didn't say it was a christian plot and second it has nothing to do with the paper. All your post shows is that you didn't read the article, since the accused girl was a christian and the christians were the group being conspired against and run out of town.
The point was the the muslims made up a fake Koran burning story in order to stir people up and run the christians out of their neighborhood.
Why does that have to be the only alternative? Talk about living in the margins, sheesh!
I agree in the seperation of government and religion, however religion is never content to keep from forcing its way into that arena.
The particular demonination I belong to believes that is a source of evil any time that boundary is violated and the state supports a religion.
Ok, what I was getting at is leaving ALL religion behind. That way we don't have fanatics demanding an 11 year old child's head when she "supposedly" burns a koran, or a bible, or a copy of whatever. Lets leave the days if Old Salem behind once and for all.
That was centuries ago, and has been rejected long since. But the false religion of Godless Communism murdered far more (try 100 million in the 20th century) innocents, much more recently, and still has many ardent fans, especially on Western university campuses. Just look at all the Che t-shirts.
Furthermore, today's leftist useful idiots support Islam, the foul totalitarian ideology behind this poor girl's persecution.
This girl has Down's Syndrome. She was no doubt terrified by the bewildering Muslim hostility she was suddenly confronted with. Typical of Islam, she has probably been raped multiple times by now.
Islam doesn't just persecute Christians. Now we see that Islam persecutes the disabled. Why are we still sending "aid" money to Muslim governments? Why are we still letting Muslims immigrate here, growing their numbers until they can impose sharia on us? Didn't many Westerners boycott South Africa because of Apartheid? Doesn't this story now show how Islam is worse than Old Salem or Apartheid? Will we wake up before Down's girls are being persecuted here?
Once again...Communists didn't kill because of, or in the name of Atheism.
What evidence do you have that the 11 year old girl was sexuall abused?
Meaning no offense, but intending merely to contribute to the dialogue: If I'm not mistaken, the unconstitutional "separation" of church and state (a corrupt concept and misstatement of the Founding Father's words and inentions) is cherished chiefly by those who despise -- not 'religion,' since there are innumerable godless religions welcomed and assisted on every hand -- but the Gospel, which alone is unwelcome. This is done to the great peril of the nation, and the inevitable decline of its power and place in the world.
This is a good read on theh subject. Pretty objective, I think.
A Wallbuilders site = Objective? No Way
Freedom of any one of the Christian Religions, Eh?
I seem to read every day where someone is trying to push their pagan religion into education, and get In Zeus we Trust put on our currency....Oh, Wait that does not occur. It is only radical Christians pushing their agenda. Maybe that is why they feel like they are being discriminated against? Because they are not being allowed to firce their religion down everyone's throat.
So you think if we don't allow you fundies to turn America into a Theocracy god will punish us by making us lose power and place in the world?
As pointed out, a wallbuilders site. As has not yet been pointed out, also dependent on false quotes that even Barton has disavowed.
Well, she is a non-muslim being held by members of a religion whose prophet and cheif moral example married a 6-year-old and wh9o generally limit their moral duties to members of their own religion. It's not that big of a stretch.
Your first statement is a lie.The Soviet Union's ideological objective, called 'gosateizm', was the elimination of religion and its replacement with atheism. This was based on Marx' dictum that "religion is the opium of the people". Communists murdered, and still do so in places such as North Korea, countless Christians in the name of atheism.
As for your second statement, I used the word "probably". And as Bren pointed out for you, Islam's "perfect man", Mohammed, whose behavior all Muslim men are supposed to emulate, was a pedophile, according to their own scriptures. Remember a place called Beslan? Muslim savages there raped and murdered hundreds of schoolchildren not long ago.
The question is, why do you support this? By "this", I'm referring mainly to Muslims murdering of Christians, and other non-Muslims, on the basis of "blasphemy", but I'm also referring to Islamic pedophilia.
What's wrong with you?
Where has anyone said they support either pedophilia or sectarian murder? Can you quote the post?
Or should we assume that since you specify that you believe "Muslims murdering of Christians, and other non-Muslims" and "Islamic pedophilia" to be wrong, you're a supporter of Christians murdering Muslims and Christian pedophilia?