close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

10MM vs .41 Mag

Discussion in 'General Firearms Forum' started by DonD, Sep 24, 2013.


  1. DonD

    DonD
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2001
    3,574
    374
    Location:
    Central TX
    I'll admit I'm a ballistics junkie, ballistics interest me. I am not trying to start a flame war either, both cartridges are excellent.

    Watching Guns & Ammo TV this evening and Dick Metcalf was saying a 10mm in a G20 was fully equal to the .41 Mag. While I've seen hotter loads for the 10mm, I'll provide comparative ballistics from Hodgdon Powder's reloading data. As close as possible to an apples to apples comparison. Max loads were:

    10mm, 5" barrel, 200gr @ 1172fps/610 ft lbs energy, 35KSI
    .41 Mag, 10" barrel, 210gr @ 1631fps/1241 ft lbs, 36.4K CUP

    While the longer barrel certainly helped the .41 mag numbers, it would undoubtedly have substantial edge even with a comparable barrel length. Don
     

    Wanna kill these ads? We can help!
  2. Bren

    Bren
    Expand Collapse
    NRA Life Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2005
    41,051
    7,433
    Location:
    Kentucky
    Ballistics is not the primary choice factor, when you compare a semi-auto cartridge to a revolver cartridge. Both the capacity and reload speed of a semi-auto and the shootability of the cartridges far outweigh ballistic numbers. If energy was most important, we'd all be carrying our .44 magnums and .380 and 9mm and .38 would be history.
     

  3. collim1

    collim1
    Expand Collapse
    Shower Time!

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2005
    7,187
    749
    Location:
    USA
  4. AK_Stick

    AK_Stick
    Expand Collapse
    AAAMAD
    1. Glock Talk's Drunk Squad

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2004
    17,252
    985
    Location:
    Alaska, again (for now)
    The 41 mag is more gun, and the 10mm, can't really hope to compete in any fair comparison.


    Though the 10mm, is by far the more popular of the two.
     
  5. Glock40man

    Glock40man
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2011
    6,856
    83
    Location:
    The Midwest
    The 41 Mag. is "more gun" in terms ballistics. In that respect, the 10MM will never be 41 Magnum period. But, you knew that. Then again, I have yet to see a 41 Mag. with the capacity of the 10MM Auto pistols. Its a trade off, they both have their place IMO.
     
  6. WinterWizard

    WinterWizard
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2012
    1,417
    3
    No way a full power 10mm matches a full power .41 magnum. It's not even a debate.
     
  7. ShallNotBeInfringed

    ShallNotBeInfringed
    Expand Collapse
    NRA Business Al

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2013
    1,566
    3
    A hot load 10 is close to ballistics of a typical 41.

    However, my Glock 20 has 20 in the magazine and one in the pipe. You can then change mags in a second or two.

    In a SHTF drama, the 41 looks better in a gun collection than it does on your hip.

    I would carry a 40 way over a 41 for capacity reasons alone.

    sent from my rotary wall phone
     
  8. Berto

    Berto
    Expand Collapse
    woo woo

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2003
    24,046
    1,935
    Location:
    WA
    Round vs round, the .41 is a bit more.
     
  9. sasqwatch2

    sasqwatch2
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2013
    432
    17
    Location:
    Illinois
    Saying 10 mm and .41 magnum in the same sentence will ruffle some petticoats around here.
     
  10. bac1023

    bac1023
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2004
    101,827
    2,436
    Location:
    PA
    Yeah, it comes up often. 41mag is capable of at Lear 50% more energy. It's really not close.

    10mm is ballistically about equal to 357mag.
     
  11. bac1023

    bac1023
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2004
    101,827
    2,436
    Location:
    PA
    Not really. It's just that saying they are equals shows how ignorant some people are about ballistics. If you don't know what you're talking about, it's usually best to keep your mouth shut.

    I think comparisons come up because they are about equal in diameter. However, power isn't close.
     
    #11 bac1023, Sep 24, 2013
    Last edited: Sep 24, 2013
  12. Pier23

    Pier23
    Expand Collapse
    Silver Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2012
    3,497
    224
    This isn't my favorite game to play, but since I have not left for work yet....

    Do we have any empiracle data to play with? Gelatin results? Dead pigs?

    I fall into the placement of the hole is more important than the hole itself camp, and if a round blows through the target without leaving a wound channel behind, a lot of energy has been expended for no practical purpose.
     
  13. Pier23

    Pier23
    Expand Collapse
    Silver Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2012
    3,497
    224
    True, but then the internet would be silent.
     
  14. bac1023

    bac1023
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2004
    101,827
    2,436
    Location:
    PA
    I agree. In fact 10mm may be more effective on human size targets since more energy may be able to be expended without just blowing through. However, if we're just talking about the rounds themselves, there is quite a difference.
     
    #14 bac1023, Sep 24, 2013
    Last edited: Sep 24, 2013
  15. JK Freak

    JK Freak
    Expand Collapse
    OffRoadRenegade

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2013
    272
    1
    Location:
    Toledo Ohio
    I'd take my Glock 20 just due to the sheer capacity of the magazines, Hard to beat 20 rounds of 10mm with 1 in the tube! Never really had a interest in the 41 mag, I bought a Smith 629 in 44 a few years back and love it!
     
  16. JK Freak

    JK Freak
    Expand Collapse
    OffRoadRenegade

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2013
    272
    1
    Location:
    Toledo Ohio
    I'm with ya pier, A 22 through the heart is gonna suck more than a 9mm through the arm!
     
  17. Bruce M

    Bruce M
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2010
    38,420
    9,057
    Location:
    S FL
    Ahh Another caliber debate. Aways enjoyable.
     
  18. bac1023

    bac1023
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2004
    101,827
    2,436
    Location:
    PA
    :rofl:
     
  19. bac1023

    bac1023
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2004
    101,827
    2,436
    Location:
    PA
    Yeah, this should really be in caliber corner.
     
  20. SDGlock23

    SDGlock23
    Expand Collapse
    Glockoholic

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2005
    6,489
    134
    Location:
    Under the dome on the flat earth
    The 10mm being a .41 Magnum is one of those old sayings that just needs to go ahead die already. It's false no doubt, but just think of how many who don't know any better have bought into it hook, line and sinker. I like the 10mm, but shot for shot, it's no .41 Mag.

    I have a 230gr 10mm that will do 1150 fps from my G20 Gen4, and that's a warm load for a 10mm, and very heavy for caliber. A .41 Mag will shoot a 230gr at near 1500 fps. Comparing my warm 10mm loads, and Underwood 10mm as well, to warmer .41 Mag loads, there's about a 300 fps advantage with the .41 Mag, plus it can shoot heavier bullets than the 10mm can.
     
    #20 SDGlock23, Sep 24, 2013
    Last edited: Sep 24, 2013