Heard that mentioned too, mine was a late April baby and still had the old but very useable connector, unlike the many told experiences of excessively high pull rates. While it has been replaced with the (-) connector and it made the trigger lighter, the trigger really doesn't seem quite as crisp on the break for me.
Mine was made Sep 2016 and it has the '-' connector. One does not have to take it apart to see that, just take the slide off and turn the gun sideways with grip on the right. On the side of my connector is stamped a '-'.
But, I've read so many different things regarding this. Some say 'no stamp' means it's a minus, some say it's not... Gads it's pretty difficult to follow what means what...
Mine was made Sep 2016 and it has the '-' connector. One does not have to take it apart to see that, just take the slide off and turn the gun sideways with grip on the right. On the side of my connector is stamped a '-'
Sounds like glock needed more than the three years when the shield and xds and rugers all came out in small single stack 9mm guns to figure out how to build one. They are using customers again to do the research on what needs fixing.
Mine was bought on May 1st and is one of the first to start coming with the 33564 If I remember correctly when I started my thread about the new connector.
The # on my 43 is BBAExxx if that helps you any
Heard that mentioned too, mine was a late April baby and still had the old but very useable connector, unlike the many told experiences of excessively high pull rates. While it has been replaced with the (-) connector and it made the trigger lighter, the trigger really doesn't seem quite as crisp on the break for me.
Same experience here. I have an older model 43 and installed the (-) connector to find out that the trigger was lighter but wasn't nearly as crisp. I haven't reinstalled the old one yet but I probably will. The heavy trigger really didn't bother me while shooting but knowing that it was a bit heavier than all my other Glocks bothered me and I thought my shooting might improve if I installed it. In reality I shot fine with the old connector and was quite accurate with it. Here is a fine example of reading too much crap on the internet and thinking you need to do it.
I broke my own rule when I bought a G43 for my wife. I swore I would never buy another Glock until they were out for at least three years so all the other suckers could complain enough that the issues would be fixed. This time I was the sucker. 11-pound trigger pull every time while the box plainly stated 5.5. Took forever but finally got it acceptable. Still not great.
My GLOCK 43 was made in 2015 and had the old connector. Like several have said here; the 33564 connector did lighten it slightly, but just doesn't "break" as clean.
Oh well, it's not really meant to have an Olympic target trigger.
Well I was about to give the old 33215 another run until I noticed a flaking issue. Don't think I want to reinstall that into something I carry most days.
Got my gray 43 about a month ago and when first firing, I didn't notice a heavier trigger than my other Glocks. In fact, I didn't even think about it.
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Glock Talk
21M posts
185.2K members
Since 1999
A forum community dedicated to Glock firearm owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about optics, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, troubleshooting, accessories, classifieds, and more!