GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-20-2011, 22:57   #81
ICARRY2
NRA Life Member
 
ICARRY2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,729
Quote:
Judge Davies ruled in his sentencing memorandum5 that, of the total fifty-plus baton strikes, only about the last six (or so) inflicted by Officer Powell were unreasonable, and therefore excessive. The judge further ruled that Rodney King’s head injuries, facial fractures, as well as his fibula (leg) fracture were all part of a reasonable use of force. It only became unreasonable when Officer Powell failed to stop striking him toward the very end of the tape, when it was judged that King had stopped resisting.
So the judge ruled that 6 baton strikes were unreasonable out of fifty-plus baton strikes and he sentenced them to prison. So much for not being a Monday morning quarterback.

Those officers should have never been fired, prosecuted or much less sent to prison.
ICARRY2 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2011, 04:57   #82
TBO
CLM Number 122
Why so serious?
 
TBO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: NRA Life Member
Posts: 44,898
Blog Entries: 1


View the video link below of a Police Shooting:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7At5...eature=related


After viewing this what does it look like? Grounds for shooting, no grounds for shooting, undetermined? This is what is often presented in a News article on TV, paper, or Online.

For more information there is a second video link below of the same incident from the 2nd squad on the scene. This would the the squad/officer to the right of the first video. What, if anything, does this information add/change. Does video really "show it all". Did video 1 show it all. These are things that need to be contemplated upon each and every "breaking" event.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPEiR...eature=related
__________________
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened."

"If you have integrity, nothing else matters. If you don't have integrity, nothing else matters".

"A person who won't reason has no advantage over one who can't reason."

"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored."

“Ignorance is a lot like alcohol: the more you have of it, the less you are able to see its effect on you.”


Originally Posted by Rooster Rugburn:
Didn't the whole sheepdog thing actually start right here on Glock Talk? A bunch of wannabees bought a bunch of T-shirts and took an oath to defend those who won't defend themselves?

Last edited by TBO; 02-24-2011 at 04:57..
TBO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2011, 05:33   #83
4949shooter
Senior Member
 
4949shooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: New Jersey Republik
Posts: 12,946


Those are great videos. They truly illustrate that events don't always appear as they seem to someone looking in from the outside.

This is why we must piece the puzzle together from the video, the officers' reports, and the evidence at the scene to determine what really transpired.
__________________
"...the men under your command deserve your leadership."-OXCOPS
4949shooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2011, 23:32   #84
TBO
CLM Number 122
Why so serious?
 
TBO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: NRA Life Member
Posts: 44,898
Blog Entries: 1


TBO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2011, 07:03   #85
txleapd
Hook 'Em Up
 
txleapd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: TX
Posts: 6,173
This thread should really be a sticky....
__________________
1911 Club #75
Kahr Club #286
Lone Star Glockers #919


"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity” Sigmund Freud
txleapd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2011, 09:45   #86
CJStudent
Fenced In
 
CJStudent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: KY
Posts: 17,727
Send a message via AIM to CJStudent Send a message via Yahoo to CJStudent
Quote:
Originally Posted by txleapd View Post
This thread should really be a sticky....
Agreed!
__________________
"Opportunity is missed by most people because it comes dressed in overalls and looks like work." -- Thomas Edison

Quote:
The first round is a moral decision. All of the following rounds are tactical decisions.
CJStudent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2011, 16:56   #87
use2b6L32
Senior Member
 
use2b6L32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kalifornistan
Posts: 1,480
BTT for stickyness.
__________________
Certified Glock Armorer
use2b6L32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2011, 20:27   #88
ateamer
NRA4EVR
 
ateamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: In the hallway - it's on cuz!
Posts: 14,748
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICARRY2 View Post
So the judge ruled that 6 baton strikes were unreasonable out of fifty-plus baton strikes and he sentenced them to prison. So much for not being a Monday morning quarterback.

Those officers should have never been fired, prosecuted or much less sent to prison.
And the judge was also a no-balls POS for not having the spine to move the trial to a venue where a fair jury could be gotten, one that wasn't terrified of what was going to happen if they acquitted. And he also could have thrown out that "dual sovereignty" BS out the window.
__________________
Firearms instructor/Glock armorer
Airplane pilot - Commercial/Instrument rating
49er Faithful
Know-it-all
ateamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2011, 18:42   #89
Straight Pipe
Senior Member
 
Straight Pipe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: too close to the boarder
Posts: 2,066
1950 - tell, make.

1960 - tell, tell again, make.

1970 - ask, tell, make.

1980 - ask, tell, tell again, make.

1990 - ask, ask again, tell, tell again, make.

2000 - ask, ask again, ask again, tell, tell again, ask once more, make.

2010 - ask, ask again, tell, ask again, tell again (in a firm but non-disrespectfull voice), ask one more time, tell them this time you mean it, beg, make (if you're not already dead).
__________________
RONPAUL 2012 STUPID didn't work so now let's try BATCRAP-CRAZY
Straight Pipe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2011, 18:55   #90
Rabbi
Lifetime Membership
The Bombdiggity
 
Rabbi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: San AntonioTexas
Posts: 30,431


Quote:
Originally Posted by Straight Pipe View Post
1950 - tell, make.

1960 - tell, tell again, make.

1970 - ask, tell, make.

1980 - ask, tell, tell again, make.

1990 - ask, ask again, tell, tell again, make.

2000 - ask, ask again, ask again, tell, tell again, ask once more, make.

2010 - ask, ask again, tell, ask again, tell again (in a firm but non-disrespectfull voice), ask one more time, tell them this time you mean it, beg, make (if you're not already dead).
I like that....sad, but true.
__________________
In the world to come, each of us will be called to account for all the good things G-d put on earth which we refused to enjoy. ~ The Babylonian Talmud

Whenever you get mad as hell about it all, grab your rifle and head outside. If you are the only one there...it's not time yet

"Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master." - Sallust
Rabbi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2011, 19:53   #91
lawman800
Juris Glocktor
 
lawman800's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Out the frying pan & into the fire!
Posts: 37,488
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Straight Pipe View Post
1950 - tell, make.

1960 - tell, tell again, make.

1970 - ask, tell, make.

1980 - ask, tell, tell again, make.

1990 - ask, ask again, tell, tell again, make.

2000 - ask, ask again, ask again, tell, tell again, ask once more, make.

2010 - ask, ask again, tell, ask again, tell again (in a firm but non-disrespectfull voice), ask one more time, tell them this time you mean it, beg, make (if you're not already dead). Get disciplined or fired for doing your job because someone thought you were being a nag for asking too many times when they didn't want to do it in the first place.
Corrected it for you.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by blueiron:
I've said it before and I'll say it here: they'd look better with lividity.
lawman800 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2011, 21:20   #92
RussP
Moderator
 
RussP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Central Virginia
Posts: 44,117
Blog Entries: 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by txleapd View Post
This thread should really be a sticky....
Done, thanks to Mrs. VR!
__________________
Freedom has a taste to those who fight and almost die, that the protected will never know.

"Comment is free, but facts are sacred." C.P. Scott, 1921
RussP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2011, 22:05   #93
Dragoon44
Lifetime Membership
Unfair Facist
 
Dragoon44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 24,414
We had a much shorter use of force process.

Tell

call and ambulance to transport for treatment or transport to jail whichever was required.
__________________
“Right is still right, even if nobody is doing it. And wrong is still wrong, even if everybody is doing it.”—Texas Ranger saying.
Dragoon44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2011, 02:46   #94
ICARRY2
NRA Life Member
 
ICARRY2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,729
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICARRY2 View Post
So the judge ruled that 6 baton strikes were unreasonable out of fifty-plus baton strikes and he sentenced them to prison. So much for not being a Monday morning quarterback.

Those officers should have never been fired, prosecuted or much less sent to prison.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ateamer View Post
And the judge was also a no-balls POS for not having the spine to move the trial to a venue where a fair jury could be gotten, one that wasn't terrified of what was going to happen if they acquitted. And he also could have thrown out that "dual sovereignty" BS out the window.
What is dual sovereignty? Never heard of it before.
ICARRY2 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2011, 11:26   #95
lawman800
Juris Glocktor
 
lawman800's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Out the frying pan & into the fire!
Posts: 37,488
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICARRY2 View Post
What is dual sovereignty? Never heard of it before.
It's a way for the government to get two bites at the apple, so to speak. Double jeopardy prevents you from being tried for the same crime twice by the same government entity, such as a state or federal court. If you got acquitted or case dismissed once jeopardy has attached, you are good to go and cannot be guilty of that crime in that jurisdiction's court of law.

This is also part of public policy for the government to bring all charges forward at the same time because they can't come back and keep charging you for different things out of the same action.

However, as the state and the Feds both may have jurisdiction over something, then you have two sovereign entities with separate courts and both can try you for the same thing and not violate double jeopardy.

Case in point, Rodney King. The state has jurisdiction over the state crimes against the officers, which then acquitted them. The Feds have jurisdiction over the civil rights part, which convicted them, even of it was out of the same transactional occurrence. No double jeopardy occurred even though the officers were tried twice for the same action.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by blueiron:
I've said it before and I'll say it here: they'd look better with lividity.
lawman800 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2011, 12:38   #96
DaBigBR
No Infidels!
 
DaBigBR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Circling the wagons.
Posts: 15,924
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICARRY2 View Post
What is dual sovereignty? Never heard of it before.
lawman covered it, but here's more info:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separat...ate_sovereigns

Also called the separate sovereigns doctrine.
__________________
"Logic is rarely the engine that propels a police department forward."

-David Simon in "Homicide"
DaBigBR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2011, 08:04   #97
coyote_bait
Member
 
coyote_bait's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ventura county, Kalifornia
Posts: 16
Not all of us civilians are completely ignorant of reasonable use of force. My first exposure to it was Rodney King, and the first thing that came to mind was, "I guess that dude should have done what he was told." I started talking to friends that were cops at the time and they began to educate me a bit on some of the use of force tactics and rules. (I have a MUCH greater understanding now as I have several friends and family members in law enforcement, and we "war game" regularly). Then the riots came, I could see fire from my house, (I lived in Long Beach at the time) NOT a real good thing to see. I was disgusted with the second trial, first, for the fact that it was filed, (this was when I learned that there is a "work around" for double jeopardy). Second, that the officers were found guilty. This was SO obviously done to prevent another riot. Later, when the O.J thing was going on, I saw a woman on T.V. say that if O.J. was found guilty that they would riot again.
Just my $0.02, and you probably got ripped off.
__________________
I've been told that I'm paranoid because I have a gun, this is nonsense, I have a gun, why would I be paranoid?

Last edited by coyote_bait; 06-01-2011 at 08:05..
coyote_bait is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2011, 04:16   #98
Straight Pipe
Senior Member
 
Straight Pipe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: too close to the boarder
Posts: 2,066
Quote:
Originally Posted by coyote_bait View Post
Not all of us civilians are completely ignorant of reasonable use of force. My first exposure to it was Rodney King, and the first thing that came to mind was, "I guess that dude should have done what he was told." I started talking to friends that were cops at the time and they began to educate me a bit on some of the use of force tactics and rules. (I have a MUCH greater understanding now as I have several friends and family members in law enforcement, and we "war game" regularly). Then the riots came, I could see fire from my house, (I lived in Long Beach at the time) NOT a real good thing to see. I was disgusted with the second trial, first, for the fact that it was filed, (this was when I learned that there is a "work around" for double jeopardy). Second, that the officers were found guilty. This was SO obviously done to prevent another riot. Later, when the O.J thing was going on, I saw a woman on T.V. say that if O.J. was found guilty that they would riot again.
Just my $0.02, and you probably got ripped off.
In the Roney King incident there were at least two times when the officers would have been justified if they used deadly force.

In other words: Those Officers got in trouble for saving his sorry life.
Needless to say, that lesson has been well learned by a lot of Officers.
__________________
RONPAUL 2012 STUPID didn't work so now let's try BATCRAP-CRAZY
Straight Pipe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2011, 18:24   #99
coyote_bait
Member
 
coyote_bait's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ventura county, Kalifornia
Posts: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by Straight Pipe View Post
In the Roney King incident there were at least two times when the officers would have been justified if they used deadly force.

In other words: Those Officers got in trouble for saving his sorry life.
Needless to say, that lesson has been well learned by a lot of Officers.
Yep, good thing they didn't because he went on to be such a fine, upstanding citizen.... Sorry, my sarcasm got away from me for a minute there.
__________________
I've been told that I'm paranoid because I have a gun, this is nonsense, I have a gun, why would I be paranoid?
coyote_bait is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2011, 20:37   #100
lawman800
Juris Glocktor
 
lawman800's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Out the frying pan & into the fire!
Posts: 37,488
Blog Entries: 1
Hey, Rodney went on to move to the exotic upscale city of Rialto where there is only 1 or 2 murders a week and the police force experiences 100% turnover every few years and who is your Chief changes depending on the whim of the City Council.

But I digress... he also has a nice, successful marriage to one of the original jurors in the civil trial who voted to give him the millions of dollars. Can anyone say, Gold DIGGAH!?!?!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by blueiron:
I've said it before and I'll say it here: they'd look better with lividity.
lawman800 is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply


Tags
deadly force, police shootings, use of force
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:58.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 764
153 Members
611 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,244
Nov 11, 2013 at 16:42