GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-19-2013, 11:22   #51
PhotoFeller
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Midwest and south
Posts: 2,681
Blog Entries: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by bac1023 View Post
Huh?

So, it's better to sacrifice the integrity of the design and the frame, because a person is afraid to use the gun as it was intended? Sounds great.

I just don't understand the logic at all. In my opinion, one of the dumbest mods in the gun industry.
bac-

I suspect you would be hard pressed to prove that the integrity of the design would be sacrificed by adding a Cominolli safety. I haven't read anything authoritative to support your claim.

Some authoritative sources, like Maas, have written that the safety works reliably. Mass stated he isn't aware of any Cominolli failures; he doesn't endorse adding the safety to a Glock, but he states that they work well.

I have considered adding a Cominolli to one or more of my Glocks, but I haven't done it. My lack of action isn't because I think it might make the gun less reliable or weaken the frame.

This topic isn't worth a lengthy debate. I simply believe unsupported statements offered to support an opinion should be questioned. If I am wrong, I will 'eat crow' and remain forever mute on this subject.

Last edited by PhotoFeller; 10-19-2013 at 11:48..
PhotoFeller is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2013, 11:50   #52
dakrat
Senior Member
 
dakrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: worldwide, on time, on target
Posts: 2,727
External thumb safety on a Glock..

General Glocking
__________________
---Revolvers are the future---

Last edited by dakrat; 10-19-2013 at 11:51..
dakrat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2013, 12:26   #53
PhotoFeller
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Midwest and south
Posts: 2,681
Blog Entries: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by ithaca_deerslayer View Post
I think it is important to have a safety on a Glock. Good ones typically cost over $50. They are made of sturdy kydex, form fitted to the shape of the gun, completly cover the trigger guard, and the gun is pulled free from them with a firm "snap" sound.

___________
I joined the NRA, have you yet?
Now here ^^ is an idea worthy of consideration. Covering the trigger with a quality holster is all the protection one needs to carry with absolute safety.

Hmmm. Why do bac and others who tote 1911s want that darn manual safety when a $50+ holster is all they really need? All one has to do after the gun is drawn from the holster is keep from touching the trigger till its time to go boom. Problem solved! No manual safety needed...on any handgun!

Last edited by PhotoFeller; 10-19-2013 at 12:26..
PhotoFeller is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2013, 12:59   #54
Warp
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
 
Warp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NE of Atlanta
Posts: 29,847
Quote:
Originally Posted by Athink3r View Post
What's odd to me is that I'm sure that most if not all here have no problem with a manual safety on pistols that come with them
I don't buy pistols that have manual safeties because my handguns are all serve defensive use and I don't want manual safeties on defensive pistols.

And if the pistol comes with one...that's probably because the way it is designed requires that you use it in order to be safe. A Glock is always safe. Trigger not pulled = won't fire.
__________________
The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.

I HIGHLY recommend Google Chrome and Adblock to all world wide web users. (I would have left GT a long time ago without these extensions!)
Warp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2013, 13:03   #55
bac1023
Senior Member
 
bac1023's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 87,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhotoFeller View Post
Now here ^^ is an idea worthy of consideration. Covering the trigger with a quality holster is all the protection one needs to carry with absolute safety.

Hmmm. Why do bac and others who tote 1911s want that darn manual safety when a $50+ holster is all they really need? All one has to do after the gun is drawn from the holster is keep from touching the trigger till its time to go boom. Problem solved! No manual safety needed...on any handgun!
Hopefully, you aren't being serious about the 1911. The trigger is totally different and it's a gun to be carried cocked and locked. You don't carry a 1911 with the safety off and hammer cocked. You're comparing apples and oranges.

While I usually carry a 1911, I do carry one of my Glocks on occasion.
__________________
.

1911 Buyer's Guide

Last edited by bac1023; 10-19-2013 at 13:41..
bac1023 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2013, 13:04   #56
mrgreg5000
Senior Member
 
mrgreg5000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: atlanta
Posts: 174
Quote:
Originally Posted by bac1023 View Post
Hopefully, you aren't being serious about the 1911. The trigger is totally different and it's a gun to be carried cocked and locked. You don't carry a 1911 with the safety off and hammer cocked. You're comparing apples and oranges.


yuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuup
__________________
greg dennis
mrgreg5000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2013, 13:17   #57
bac1023
Senior Member
 
bac1023's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 87,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhotoFeller View Post
bac-

I suspect you would be hard pressed to prove that the integrity of the design would be sacrificed by adding a Cominolli safety. I haven't read anything authoritative to support your claim.

Some authoritative sources, like Maas, have written that the safety works reliably. Mass stated he isn't aware of any Cominolli failures; he doesn't endorse adding the safety to a Glock, but he states that they work well.

I have considered adding a Cominolli to one or more of my Glocks, but I haven't done it. My lack of action isn't because I think it might make the gun less reliable or weaken the frame.

This topic isn't worth a lengthy debate. I simply believe unsupported statements offered to support an opinion should be questioned. If I am wrong, I will 'eat crow' and remain forever mute on this subject.
I have no more proof that it compromises integrity than you do that it doesn't.

All I know is that altering a proven design to that degree is never a good thing.
__________________
.

1911 Buyer's Guide
bac1023 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2013, 13:50   #58
PhotoFeller
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Midwest and south
Posts: 2,681
Blog Entries: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by bac1023 View Post
Hopefully, you aren't being serious about the 1911. The trigger is totally different and it's a gun to be carried cocked and locked. You don't carry a 1911 with the safety off and hammer cocked. You're comparing apples and oranges.

While I usually carry a 1911, I go carry one of my Glocks on occasion.
My query goes to logic more than trigger design consideration.

The common 'logic' among GT members:

-Always use a quality holster in good condition to carry safely. If the trigger is covered in a secure holster, the pistol is absolutely safe from unintended discharge.

-Always keep the trigger finger outside of the trigger guard when handling the pistol for any reason, except at the moment when the pistol is to be intentionally fired at a specific target. This 'trigger finger discipline' is all that is needed to avoid a ND.

My question is, why doesn't this pair of widely held safety rules apply to all handguns, including the 1911? Either the rules are absolute, or they are not. If they are not absolutely true, why doesn't the logic hold for some handguns?
PhotoFeller is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2013, 14:26   #59
bac1023
Senior Member
 
bac1023's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 87,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhotoFeller View Post

My question is, why doesn't this pair of widely held safety rules apply to all handguns, including the 1911? Either the rules are absolute, or they are not. If they are not absolutely true, why doesn't the logic hold for some handguns?
Come on, man...

The 1911 isn't designed that way. That would be akin to carrying a revolver with the hammer back, as the grip safety would be squeezed just by taking the gun out of its holster.

The Glock's trigger is designed to be much safer. When you carry a decocker design, such as a Sig, there is essentially no safety either.

Let's all use some common sense here.

The bottom line is to carry the gun as designed instead of altering the design to mimic a different gun that you probably should have bought in the first place.
__________________
.

1911 Buyer's Guide
bac1023 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2013, 14:41   #60
PaLEOjd
Senior Member
 
PaLEOjd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,768
Quote:
Originally Posted by bac1023 View Post
If you want a manual safety, you don't buy a Glock. It's that simple.

Glock did offer models with an external manual safety. Not sure if there are any here in the USA or if they still come from the factory for anybody anymore but Glock did make them for the Tasmanian police at one point.

Here is a photo from Glock. Not sure how long ago this was but it was posted on here a few years ago.

General Glocking
__________________
G19, G19-Gen4, G17 RTF2 "gilly", G17-Gen4
G27, G23, G23-Gen4 G22-Gen4, G26-Gen4, G26
PaLEOjd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2013, 14:50   #61
bac1023
Senior Member
 
bac1023's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 87,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaLEOjd View Post
Glock did offer models with an external manual safety. Not sure if there are any here in the USA or if they still come from the factory for anybody anymore but Glock did make them for the Tasmanian police at one point.

Here is a photo from Glock. Not sure how long ago this was but it was posted on here a few years ago.

General Glocking
I remember seeing the ad, but I never saw one in the flesh and wasn't even sure they were ever produced.
__________________
.

1911 Buyer's Guide
bac1023 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2013, 14:50   #62
Warp
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
 
Warp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NE of Atlanta
Posts: 29,847
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhotoFeller View Post
My query goes to logic more than trigger design consideration.

The common 'logic' among GT members:

-Always use a quality holster in good condition to carry safely. If the trigger is covered in a secure holster, the pistol is absolutely safe from unintended discharge.

-Always keep the trigger finger outside of the trigger guard when handling the pistol for any reason, except at the moment when the pistol is to be intentionally fired at a specific target. This 'trigger finger discipline' is all that is needed to avoid a ND.

My question is, why doesn't this pair of widely held safety rules apply to all handguns, including the 1911? Either the rules are absolute, or they are not. If they are not absolutely true, why doesn't the logic hold for some handguns?


Because different pistols are designed differently.

Some are safe all the time, like the Glock. Others are not safe unless they are on safe.
__________________
The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.

I HIGHLY recommend Google Chrome and Adblock to all world wide web users. (I would have left GT a long time ago without these extensions!)

Last edited by Warp; 10-19-2013 at 14:51..
Warp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2013, 15:00   #63
PhotoFeller
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Midwest and south
Posts: 2,681
Blog Entries: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by bac1023 View Post
Come on, man...

The 1911 isn't designed that way. That would be akin to carrying a revolver with the hammer back, as the grip safety would be squeezed just by taking the gun out of its holster.

The Glock's trigger is designed to be much safer. When you carry a decocker design, such as a Sig, there is essentially no safety either.

Let's all use some common sense here.

The bottom line is to carry the gun as designed instead of altering the design to mimic a different gun that you probably should have bought in the first place.
Will a 1911 fire if the trigger isn't pulled?

Are you saying the Glock pistol forgives some unintended pressure on the trigger while a 1911 does not? Said another way, one can be a little 'sloppy' with a Glock in Condition 1 while there is no margin for sloppiness with a cocked and locked 1911?

What element of common sense am I overlooking?

Are you also saying trigger finger discipline does not provide absolute prevention of touching the trigger unintentionally.
PhotoFeller is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2013, 15:17   #64
Tiro Fijo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 5,016
PhotoFeller, you've beat this topic to death as you have countless times before. Personally, I think you should carry a musket and DO NOT apply the percussion cap until the enemy has appeared.
Tiro Fijo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2013, 15:24   #65
Nakanokalronin
JMB & MTK
 
Nakanokalronin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,156
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhotoFeller View Post
Will a 1911 fire if the trigger isn't pulled?

Are you saying the Glock pistol forgives some unintended pressure on the trigger while a 1911 does not? Said another way, one can be a little 'sloppy' with a Glock in Condition 1 while there is no margin for sloppiness with a cocked and locked 1911?

What element of common sense am I overlooking?

Are you also saying trigger finger discipline does not provide absolute prevention of touching the trigger unintentionally.
Been there and read this before. The guns are designed the way they where meant to be. The 1911 has a very short pull, if you want they make a DA 1911, although not many care for them. A short pull is why the thumb safety exists since the shelf of the sear against the hammer is small and could cause an issue if dropped right, although it's slim. The hammer just drops when the trigger is pulled. An XD/M is closer to a SA gun, hence the grip safety.

The Glock was made with a striker block, trigger tab and a longer pull hence why there are no safeties. Learn mechanics of a gun and you'll understand why certain safeties are in place and how some are pointless. A pointless one is like on my BG380. A thumb safety on a long DAO gun is pretty pointless. A thumb safety on a Glock is also pointless unless there is no trigger control from the user on a DAO system.

I don't know what else to tell you put learn the mechanics and understand why one gun has this and the other gun has that.
Nakanokalronin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2013, 15:24   #66
tonyparson
Senior Member
 
tonyparson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dayton, TN.
Posts: 5,059
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiro Fijo View Post
PhotoFeller, you've beat this topic to death as you have countless times before. Personally, I think you should carry a musket and DO NOT apply the percussion cap until the enemy has appeared.
__________________
When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.......
Thomas Jefferson
tonyparson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2013, 15:28   #67
F106 Fan
Senior Member
 
F106 Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 5,389
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhotoFeller View Post
Will a 1911 fire if the trigger isn't pulled?

Are you saying the Glock pistol forgives some unintended pressure on the trigger while a 1911 does not? Said another way, one can be a little 'sloppy' with a Glock in Condition 1 while there is no margin for sloppiness with a cocked and locked 1911?

What element of common sense am I overlooking?

Are you also saying trigger finger discipline does not provide absolute prevention of touching the trigger unintentionally.
On a 1911, it takes very few thousandths of an inch of trigger pull to get it to fire. The hammer is fully cocked and will fire with the slightest trigger pull.

On the Glock, the firing pin spring is compressed by the trigger motion. Even if the firing pin could move forward without a trigger pull, it is unlikely to carry enough energy to light the primer. Basically, the Glock isn't cocked.

Both systems may have a firing pin block. 1911s prior to the Series 80 models (or similar) don't have a firing pin block. Models after the Series 80 may have a firing pin block. Different manufacturers choose whether to implement it or not. For California, a firearm may not discharge when dropped so all guns introduced after 1/1/2001 probably have a firing pin block. Obviously, the Glocks always have a firing pin block.

A 1911 without a firing pin block will very probably discharge with some kind of impact if the thumb safety is disengaged. There is also the possibility that the hammer will only fall to the half-cock notch. That was always the intent. But it clearly wasn't sufficient or we wouldn't have the firing pin block.

Richard
__________________
"No matter how cynical you become, it's never enough to keep up." - Lily Tomlin

Last edited by F106 Fan; 10-19-2013 at 15:33..
F106 Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2013, 15:36   #68
PhotoFeller
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Midwest and south
Posts: 2,681
Blog Entries: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by F106 Fan View Post
On a 1911, it takes very few thousandths of an inch of trigger pull to get it to fire. The hammer is fully cocked and will fire with the slightest trigger pull.

On the Glock, the firing pin spring is compressed by the trigger motion. Even if the firing pin could move forward without a trigger pull, it is unlikely to carry enough energy to light the primer. Basically, the Glock isn't cocked.

Both systems may have a firing pin block. 1911s prior to the Series 80 models (or similar) don't have a firing pin block. Models after the Series 80 may have a firing pin block. Different manufacturers choose whether to implement it or not. For California, a firearm may not discharge when dropped so all guns introduced after 1/1/2001 probably have a firing pin block. Obviously, the Glocks always have a firing pin block.

A 1911 without a firing pin block will very probably discharge with some kind of impact if the thumb safety is disengaged. There is also the possibility that the hammer will only fall to the half-cock notch. That was always the intent. But it clearly wasn't sufficient or we wouldn't have the firing pin block.

Richard
Thanks.
PhotoFeller is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2013, 15:40   #69
bac1023
Senior Member
 
bac1023's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 87,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhotoFeller View Post
Will a 1911 fire if the trigger isn't pulled?

Are you saying the Glock pistol forgives some unintended pressure on the trigger while a 1911 does not? Said another way, one can be a little 'sloppy' with a Glock in Condition 1 while there is no margin for sloppiness with a cocked and locked 1911?

What element of common sense am I overlooking?

Are you also saying trigger finger discipline does not provide absolute prevention of touching the trigger unintentionally.
I honestly don't think you're overlooking anything. I think you're intentionally trying to be argumentative. I just got finished explaining to you the differences. The 1911 is not safe to be carried cocked and unlocked, just as a revolver is not safe to be carried cocked. Very little trigger pressure is needed to discharge the gun. Glocks are DESIGNED to be carried that way.

What don't you understand?

Quite honestly, my theory of there being no such thing as a stupid question has been seriously put into doubt over your last couple of posts.

Good grief...
__________________
.

1911 Buyer's Guide
bac1023 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2013, 15:42   #70
PhotoFeller
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Midwest and south
Posts: 2,681
Blog Entries: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nakanokalronin View Post
Been there and read this before. The guns are designed the way they where meant to be. The 1911 has a very short pull, if you want they make a DA 1911, although not many care for them. A short pull is why the thumb safety exists since the shelf of the sear against the hammer is small and could cause an issue if dropped right, although it's slim. The hammer just drops when the trigger is pulled. An XD/M is closer to a SA gun, hence the grip safety.

The Glock was made with a striker block, trigger tab and a longer pull hence why there are no safeties. Learn mechanics of a gun and you'll understand why certain safeties are in place and how some are pointless. A pointless one is like on my BG380. A thumb safety on a long DAO gun is pretty pointless. A thumb safety on a Glock is also pointless unless there is no trigger control from the user on a DAO system.

I don't know what else to tell you put learn the mechanics and understand why one gun has this and the other gun has that.
Thanks. All I want is for the 'experts' to explain why they hold the opinions they do. Facts are helpful. Cryptic answers that imply "trust me, I am an authority" don't do much for me.
PhotoFeller is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2013, 15:52   #71
bac1023
Senior Member
 
bac1023's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 87,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhotoFeller View Post
Thanks. All I want is for the 'experts' to explain why they hold the opinions they do. Facts are helpful. Cryptic answers that imply "trust me, I am an authority" don't do much for me.
Honestly, some of it is so blatantly obvious, I fail to see why explanation is needed in the first place...
__________________
.

1911 Buyer's Guide
bac1023 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2013, 15:54   #72
PhotoFeller
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Midwest and south
Posts: 2,681
Blog Entries: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by bac1023 View Post
I honestly don't think you're overlooking anything. I think you're intentionally trying to be argumentative. I just got finished explaining to you the differences. The 1911 is not safe to be carried cocked and unlocked, just as a revolver is not safe to be carried cocked. Very little trigger pressure is needed to discharge the gun. Glocks are DESIGNED to be carried that way.

What don't you understand?

Quite honestly, my theory of there being no such thing as a stupid question has been seriously put into doubt over your last couple of posts.

Good grief...
Argumentative? Is that a bad thing?
PhotoFeller is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2013, 16:00   #73
PhotoFeller
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Midwest and south
Posts: 2,681
Blog Entries: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by bac1023 View Post
Honestly, some of it is so blatantly obvious, I fail to see why explanation is needed in the first place...
Blatantly obvious to folks who are new to handguns, new to GT?
PhotoFeller is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2013, 16:00   #74
ithaca_deerslayer
Senior Member
 
ithaca_deerslayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Upstate NY, USA
Posts: 18,591
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhotoFeller View Post
My query goes to logic more than trigger design consideration.

The common 'logic' among GT members:

-Always use a quality holster in good condition to carry safely. If the trigger is covered in a secure holster, the pistol is absolutely safe from unintended discharge.

-Always keep the trigger finger outside of the trigger guard when handling the pistol for any reason, except at the moment when the pistol is to be intentionally fired at a specific target. This 'trigger finger discipline' is all that is needed to avoid a ND.

My question is, why doesn't this pair of widely held safety rules apply to all handguns, including the 1911? Either the rules are absolute, or they are not. If they are not absolutely true, why doesn't the logic hold for some handguns?
I think you have a good point and have used good logic.

Bac won't agree with me on this, but this point is why I think a Glock is better than a 1911 for a carry gun. Glock is also better than DA/SA semi-autos.

I think I get what Bac is saying, to use those guns as designed. But what I'm saying is the Glock is a higher form of evolution. Use with a good holster for safety, and keep finger off trigger until BOOM time.

No need for a manual safety on a Glock. And other than collecting and appreciating the classics, no need for having a carry gun that requires a safety

Lets also add to this that we don't need a change in trigger pull from first shot to second shot

___________
I joined the NRA, have you yet?
ithaca_deerslayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2013, 16:09   #75
ShallNotBeInfringed
NRA Business Al
 
ShallNotBeInfringed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: NRA Benefactor Life Member Nebraska
Posts: 1,238
Quote:
Originally Posted by ithaca_deerslayer View Post

Lets also add to this that we don't need a change in trigger pull from first shot to second shot

___________
I joined the NRA, have you yet?
For those of us that understand the firearm, the first shot is different than subsequent shots, because we do not recycle the trigger 100%
__________________
19 21 Cutaways 19 19C 20 20SF 21 21C 23 23C 32 32C 22LR 460 Glock Armorer
Nebraska Concealed Carry Instructor, 32 years CC Experience1981-2013 Retired FFL1991-2001
NRA Benefactor Life NRA CRSO NRA instructor RSOi CPi PPITHi PPOTHi RTBAVi
ShallNotBeInfringed is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 22:39.



Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,187
324 Members
863 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,244
Nov 11, 2013 at 11:42