GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-08-2013, 01:54   #1
HerrGlock
CLM Number 2
Scouts Out
 
HerrGlock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 64,410


On concealed carry, Illinois governor could lose policy battle but win poli

http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/g...d38a041da.html
__________________
Sent from my rotary phone
"The way I see it as soon as a baby is born, he should be issued a banjo!"- Linus Van Pelt
UNIX - Not just for Vestal Virgins any more
HerrGlock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2013, 17:26   #2
clarson_75
Senior Member
 
clarson_75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 331
I knew the liberals would argue their way into a corner. You are from Ill. aren't you Herr? Do you think constitutional carry will take effect?
__________________
Our two party system is like a giant bowl of **** staring at itself in the mirror ~ Lewis Black

This nation is lead by a government that doesn't care what the law is and filled with a majority of people that don't care what the government does.
clarson_75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2013, 17:40   #3
HerrGlock
CLM Number 2
Scouts Out
 
HerrGlock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 64,410


Quote:
Originally Posted by clarson_75 View Post
I knew the liberals would argue their way into a corner. You are from Ill. aren't you Herr? Do you think constitutional carry will take effect?
Nope, I've driven through Chicago a few times is as close to living there as I've ever come.

My guess: They're going to override the veto tomorrow, it's going to be the one they passed and Quinn is going to bluster and whine until dooms day.

The state police will whine about having only 30 days to turn around licenses and the first ones will go out about 45-60 days after they're submitted.

A handful of people will be arrested for minor violations (in posted store) and some of the cops will try to make examples of these people.

There will be lawsuits galore with the state guys dragging their feet. The Chicago way of life will get turned all screwy because they have to issue permits and aren't allowed to have anything resembling the iron hand they've been used to.

Somewhere around January the first permits will hit the streets and Chicago politicians will be griping, moaning and complaining for years.

Next year one of the first things on the agenda state politician-wise will be adding restrictions on the permits followed by some amendments from down state relaxing the permit requirements and off limits places.
__________________
Sent from my rotary phone
"The way I see it as soon as a baby is born, he should be issued a banjo!"- Linus Van Pelt
UNIX - Not just for Vestal Virgins any more
HerrGlock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2013, 17:52   #4
Caver 60
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Midwest
Posts: 3,551
I hope his 'campaign rally' stunt backfires on him.

Remember the SLPD is also rabidly antigun.
Caver 60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2013, 18:53   #5
Fox
Varmit Control
 
Fox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 8,168
Blog Entries: 1
I hope the legislators override his veto and make him look weak for the DNC primary elections. It will mean that he will spend alot of his money fighting off challengers in the primary election before the general election.
Fox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2013, 21:43   #6
WarCry
Senior Member
 
WarCry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: IL, on the banks of the Muddy River
Posts: 7,213
Quote:
Originally Posted by HerrGlock View Post
Nope, I've driven through Chicago a few times is as close to living there as I've ever come.

My guess: They're going to override the veto tomorrow, it's going to be the one they passed and Quinn is going to bluster and whine until dooms day.

The state police will whine about having only 30 days to turn around licenses and the first ones will go out about 45-60 days after they're submitted.

A handful of people will be arrested for minor violations (in posted store) and some of the cops will try to make examples of these people.

There will be lawsuits galore with the state guys dragging their feet. The Chicago way of life will get turned all screwy because they have to issue permits and aren't allowed to have anything resembling the iron hand they've been used to.

Somewhere around January the first permits will hit the streets and Chicago politicians will be griping, moaning and complaining for years.

Next year one of the first things on the agenda state politician-wise will be adding restrictions on the permits followed by some amendments from down state relaxing the permit requirements and off limits places.
The only things you've got wrong here are the issue times. FOID cards are 30 days. the CCW is going to start with a 90-day issue time. Law enforcement has 30 days to lodge a protest if they want, which will then send it to a review panel (it is NOT "may issue". Local LEO cannot deny permits, they can simply file that think an applicant shouldn't be approved).

The ISP has 180 days to create an application, and 60 days to figure out who they're going to authorize as trainers. I don't know if they'll take the full 180 days to make the application, but it's probably 60/40 and pick 'em whether they do or not.
__________________
"If you have something to say, now would be a perfect time to keep it to yourself." --Col. Chester Phillips
"If you believe everything you read, better not read." --Japanese proverb
WarCry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2013, 02:14   #7
HerrGlock
CLM Number 2
Scouts Out
 
HerrGlock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 64,410


Now here's one for people to think about.

When can out of staters drive through Chicago with a CCW on their hip? As soon as it's signed? 60 days? 90 days?

I know the state police have 180 days to implement but when does the actual law take effect?

This is the one point that is amusing as hell whenever a new state passes this law, out of state people with permits recognized can carry sooner than instate people.

(edit) I see this in many of the articles
Quote:
If the override succeeds, the bill becomes law immediately.

http://www.bnd.com/2013/07/08/268693...#storylink=cpy
So out of state people driving from Indiana to Wisconsin could carry Wed morning if the veto is overridden.

I kinda feel sorry for the first handful of people who get pulled over and say, "I'm carrying a handgun on my hip..."
__________________
Sent from my rotary phone
"The way I see it as soon as a baby is born, he should be issued a banjo!"- Linus Van Pelt
UNIX - Not just for Vestal Virgins any more

Last edited by HerrGlock; 07-09-2013 at 02:17..
HerrGlock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2013, 07:17   #8
07 LMB Z06
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 467
Quote:
Originally Posted by HerrGlock View Post
Now here's one for people to think about.

When can out of staters drive through Chicago with a CCW on their hip? As soon as it's signed? 60 days? 90 days?

I know the state police have 180 days to implement but when does the actual law take effect?

This is the one point that is amusing as hell whenever a new state passes this law, out of state people with permits recognized can carry sooner than instate people.

(edit) I see this in many of the articles


So out of state people driving from Indiana to Wisconsin could carry Wed morning if the veto is overridden.

I kinda feel sorry for the first handful of people who get pulled over and say, "I'm carrying a handgun on my hip..."
I believe you can only carry from out of state as long as you are simply driving through IL to get to another destination (as you mentioned) and you do not exit your vehicle. You will want to verify this yourself before trying it, but I believe I remember that being the case.

If you plan on actually carrying in IL you will need a non-resident permit which will take just as long as a resident permit and will also cost you $300.

Last edited by 07 LMB Z06; 07-09-2013 at 07:18..
07 LMB Z06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2013, 08:25   #9
WarCry
Senior Member
 
WarCry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: IL, on the banks of the Muddy River
Posts: 7,213
Quote:
Originally Posted by HerrGlock View Post
Now here's one for people to think about.

When can out of staters drive through Chicago with a CCW on their hip? As soon as it's signed? 60 days? 90 days?

I know the state police have 180 days to implement but when does the actual law take effect?

This is the one point that is amusing as hell whenever a new state passes this law, out of state people with permits recognized can carry sooner than instate people.

(edit) I see this in many of the articles


So out of state people driving from Indiana to Wisconsin could carry Wed morning if the veto is overridden.

I kinda feel sorry for the first handful of people who get pulled over and say, "I'm carrying a handgun on my hip..."
The bill says "This Act takes effect upon becoming law".

House and Senate are both in session at 11am Central this morning (I can provide links to live feeds if anyone's interested), and if they both vote to override, then the law is effective upon the final (second) vote. If both vote by noon, you can drive from South Bend to Milwaukee for dinner tonight.
__________________
"If you have something to say, now would be a perfect time to keep it to yourself." --Col. Chester Phillips
"If you believe everything you read, better not read." --Japanese proverb
WarCry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2013, 09:52   #10
wjv
Senior Member
 
wjv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 12,243
Quote:
Originally Posted by HerrGlock View Post
Somewhere around January the first permits will hit the streets and Chicago politicians will be griping, moaning and complaining for years.
The crime rate will go down and all of the politicians will take credit for it but none will name CCW as being part of the reason. . .
__________________
Bill
Pacific NW


The urge to save humanity is almost always a false-face for the urge to rule it.
- H. L. Mencken -
wjv is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2013, 10:00   #11
HerrGlock
CLM Number 2
Scouts Out
 
HerrGlock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 64,410


Quote:
Originally Posted by wjv View Post
The crime rate will go down and all of the politicians will take credit for it but none will name CCW as being part of the reason. . .
Actually, I do believe Chicago is going to be the exception to what I've seen elsewhere.

There's going to be quite a few shootings at first. Remember, the gang bangers are used to being completely in charge of any part of the city they care to take.

It'll take a bit of reeducation before they figure out the people have teeth.

The other side of that is the people in and around Chicago are so conditioned to abhor guns that there won't be near as many carry permits there as there normally are elsewhere. It'll take (my guess) a year or so of getting used to "Hey, people actually carry firearms and are NOT criminals. Lemme see about this" frame of mind.
__________________
Sent from my rotary phone
"The way I see it as soon as a baby is born, he should be issued a banjo!"- Linus Van Pelt
UNIX - Not just for Vestal Virgins any more
HerrGlock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2013, 10:06   #12
Jakestir
Senior Member
 
Jakestir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 966
Quote:
Originally Posted by HerrGlock View Post
Actually, I do believe Chicago is going to be the exception to what I've seen elsewhere.

There's going to be quite a few shootings at first. Remember, the gang bangers are used to being completely in charge of any part of the city they care to take.

It'll take a bit of reeducation before they figure out the people have teeth.

The other side of that is the people in and around Chicago are so conditioned to abhor guns that there won't be near as many carry permits there as there normally are elsewhere. It'll take (my guess) a year or so of getting used to "Hey, people actually carry firearms and are NOT criminals. Lemme see about this" frame of mind.
This and I would assume a pistol permit from the city is still required. Also mag limits and such. A lot of hoops for the average person to jump through.

Sent from my Milestone X2 using Ohub Campfire mobile app
Jakestir is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2013, 10:37   #13
WarCry
Senior Member
 
WarCry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: IL, on the banks of the Muddy River
Posts: 7,213
House overrides veto 77-31

Off to the Senate.
__________________
"If you have something to say, now would be a perfect time to keep it to yourself." --Col. Chester Phillips
"If you believe everything you read, better not read." --Japanese proverb
WarCry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2013, 10:37   #14
HerrGlock
CLM Number 2
Scouts Out
 
HerrGlock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 64,410


Quote:
Originally Posted by Jakestir View Post
This and I would assume a pistol permit from the city is still required. Also mag limits and such. A lot of hoops for the average person to jump through.
They cannot have mag limits or any other limit for handguns beyond what's set for the state in the bill sent to Quinn.

The House just overrode Quinn's concealed-carry AV 77-31. No discussion.
__________________
Sent from my rotary phone
"The way I see it as soon as a baby is born, he should be issued a banjo!"- Linus Van Pelt
UNIX - Not just for Vestal Virgins any more
HerrGlock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2013, 10:45   #15
WarCry
Senior Member
 
WarCry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: IL, on the banks of the Muddy River
Posts: 7,213
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jakestir View Post
This and I would assume a pistol permit from the city is still required. Also mag limits and such. A lot of hoops for the average person to jump through.

Sent from my Milestone X2 using Ohub Campfire mobile app
Local ordinances on long-guns in place or passed within 10 days after adoption of this bill are valid. Anything after 10 days would be invalid (i.e. Cook County's AWB).

ANY handgun ordinances are invalid as of the adoption of HB0183, including Chicago's asinine city fees, licensing, registration, etc. All authority for handgun law rests solely with the state, negating other current ordinances on the books and banning any future ordinances.
__________________
"If you have something to say, now would be a perfect time to keep it to yourself." --Col. Chester Phillips
"If you believe everything you read, better not read." --Japanese proverb
WarCry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2013, 10:46   #16
IndyGunFreak
RIP My Friends
 
IndyGunFreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Indiana
Posts: 29,691
Send a message via ICQ to IndyGunFreak Send a message via AIM to IndyGunFreak Send a message via MSN to IndyGunFreak Send a message via Yahoo to IndyGunFreak Send a message via Skype™ to IndyGunFreak


What time is the recall vote.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by GioaJack View Post
The fire is no longer my major concern since I am leaving immediately on an unexpected road trip to Indianapolis. Watch the national news over the next couple of days, I'll wave... well, only if I'm cuffed in the front.
RIP Jack
IndyGunFreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2013, 10:49   #17
blackjack
Senior Member
 
blackjack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Sand Springs OK
Posts: 2,169
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarCry View Post
ANY handgun ordinances are invalid as of the adoption of HB0183, including Chicago's asinine city fees, licensing, registration, etc. All authority for handgun law rests solely with the state, negating other current ordinances on the books and banning any future ordinances.
I'm glad to see this part and I hope they can pull it off. I expect this is what will be tied up in court with various groups in the vanguard: home rule cities, anti-gun advocates, etc.
blackjack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2013, 11:00   #18
WarCry
Senior Member
 
WarCry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: IL, on the banks of the Muddy River
Posts: 7,213
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackjack View Post
I'm glad to see this part and I hope they can pull it off. I expect this is what will be tied up in court with various groups in the vanguard: home rule cities, anti-gun advocates, etc.
No court-challenges needed. In order for any legislation to overrule the Home Rule, they require a 3/5th super majority. Both houses passed 183 with that margin and room to spare.

I mean, it COULD be challenged, of course, but it was all done straight up according to the law of IL. If they hadn't wanted to overrule the Home Rule authority, we would have had CCW 3 years ago.
__________________
"If you have something to say, now would be a perfect time to keep it to yourself." --Col. Chester Phillips
"If you believe everything you read, better not read." --Japanese proverb

Last edited by WarCry; 07-09-2013 at 11:00..
WarCry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2013, 11:00   #19
Jakestir
Senior Member
 
Jakestir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 966
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarCry View Post
Local ordinances on long-guns in place or passed within 10 days after adoption of this bill are valid. Anything after 10 days would be invalid (i.e. Cook County's AWB).

ANY handgun ordinances are invalid as of the adoption of HB0183, including Chicago's asinine city fees, licensing, registration, etc. All authority for handgun law rests solely with the state, negating other current ordinances on the books and banning any future ordinances.
Thanks for the correction

Sent from my Milestone X2 using Ohub Campfire mobile app
Jakestir is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2013, 11:45   #20
blackjack
Senior Member
 
blackjack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Sand Springs OK
Posts: 2,169
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarCry View Post
No court-challenges needed. In order for any legislation to overrule the Home Rule, they require a 3/5th super majority. Both houses passed 183 with that margin and room to spare.

I mean, it COULD be challenged, of course, but it was all done straight up according to the law of IL. If they hadn't wanted to overrule the Home Rule authority, we would have had CCW 3 years ago.
And the good news keeps on coming... There may be hope for IL yet -- it's just tough for me to overcome my own cynicism that is reinforced with such matters as "The Chicago Way."
blackjack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2013, 11:54   #21
WarCry
Senior Member
 
WarCry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: IL, on the banks of the Muddy River
Posts: 7,213
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackjack View Post
And the good news keeps on coming... There may be hope for IL yet -- it's just tough for me to overcome my own cynicism that is reinforced with such matters as "The Chicago Way."
I'm not QUITE ready to say it's a done deal yet. The bill passed the house with 89 votes, but only had 77 vote to override the veto. If there's that big of 'change of heart' in the Senate, there could be a problem.
__________________
"If you have something to say, now would be a perfect time to keep it to yourself." --Col. Chester Phillips
"If you believe everything you read, better not read." --Japanese proverb
WarCry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2013, 12:02   #22
Caver 60
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Midwest
Posts: 3,551
What about some activist judge legislating from the bench and at least delaying things by allowing numerous antigun court challenges? Happened when CCW was passed in MO. Took months to get it all straightened out.
Caver 60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2013, 12:02   #23
Jakestir
Senior Member
 
Jakestir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 966
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarCry View Post
I'm not QUITE ready to say it's a done deal yet. The bill passed the house with 89 votes, but only had 77 vote to override the veto. If there's that big of 'change of heart' in the Senate, there could be a problem.
Let's hope not. It would be nice if this state could at least do this right.

Sent from my Milestone X2 using Ohub Campfire mobile app
Jakestir is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2013, 12:03   #24
WarCry
Senior Member
 
WarCry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: IL, on the banks of the Muddy River
Posts: 7,213
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jakestir View Post
Let's hope not. It would be nice if this state could at least do this right.

Sent from my Milestone X2 using Ohub Campfire mobile app
I think it'll be okay, but the loss of 12 votes was pretty drastic in the House.
__________________
"If you have something to say, now would be a perfect time to keep it to yourself." --Col. Chester Phillips
"If you believe everything you read, better not read." --Japanese proverb
WarCry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2013, 13:20   #25
RHVEtte
Senior Member
 
RHVEtte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,847
Is the Senate back in session and voting on this yet? If they don't pass it by the end of the day, what happens?
__________________
Liberty is a candle in a tempest. It is a rare and beautiful thing that must be jealously guarded, lest it be snuffed out. And like the candle, Liberty under tyranny is difficult to reignite. -- undoubtedly said by someone smarter than I.
RHVEtte is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 17:25.



Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,320
439 Members
881 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,244
Nov 11, 2013 at 11:42