GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-05-2013, 14:13   #51
SCmasterblaster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Hartford, Vermont
Posts: 15,863
I wouldn't mind having a .380 pocket pistol for my wintertime coat.
__________________
Gun Ownership Offers Freedom in Many Dimensions
SCmasterblaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 15:05   #52
Warp
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
 
Warp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NE of Atlanta
Posts: 29,847
Quote:
Originally Posted by SCmasterblaster View Post
I wouldn't mind having a .380 pocket pistol for my wintertime coat.
Would you choose that over a .38spl +P 5 shot snub nose revolver? If so, why?
__________________
The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.

I HIGHLY recommend Google Chrome and Adblock to all world wide web users. (I would have left GT a long time ago without these extensions!)
Warp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 15:15   #53
Joshhtn
Rastaman!
 
Joshhtn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 6,195


Quote:
Originally Posted by Warp View Post
Would you choose that over a .38spl +P 5 shot snub nose revolver? If so, why?
Perhaps weight, width, & capacity?

I can't help but notice your overwhelming hatred for the 380... Why so much hate?
__________________
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
***CHECK OUT MY EBAY STORE FOR EVERYTHING YOU NEED-***
HEINRICH TREASURES

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric View Post
Dude, you are ****ing banned.

Last edited by Joshhtn; 05-05-2013 at 15:53..
Joshhtn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 15:18   #54
CharlestonG26
Senior Member
 
CharlestonG26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 3,132
Quote:
Originally Posted by fg17 View Post
What I'm talking about is that you will be fine with a .380 and in my situation and in most peoples situation the odds of actually using your gun are so small that it does not justify carrying a bigger gun. To each his own.

Pros: compact, lightweight, can carry almost all the time

con: minimal stopping power, harder to shoot than a bigger gun.
Some years ago I decided to 'base my situation' on the possibility that I was seated in a restaurant when a lunatic walked in and decided to randomly open fire on the patrons. I sure as hell don't want to depend on 7 yard shooting skills and a Ruger LCP to save my *****.
__________________
NRA Life Member

"Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the Act depriving a whole nation of arms, as the blackest." Mahatma Gandhi
CharlestonG26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 15:35   #55
Delmonte67
Glock 40 cal.
 
Delmonte67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 1,008
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredj338 View Post
This shows a tremendous lack of understanding wound ballistics. FWIW, just because a LEA issues something doesn't mean much. If you need your BUG, you need it badly & a 380, IMO, just ain't getting it done. Again, shorts or not, there are micro 9mm that are easier to shoot & more effective.
Bro, I carry my 380 for the SIZE. Caliber Corner To HIDE in shorts while swinging a club, or sitting on a boat fishing very comfortably. I own several calibers of pistols- and I love them all, I love my G27 probably the most, but I have no problem with 380 as a self defense round in a close quarters confrontation. Hell -I would'nt want to get shot with a pellet gun repeatedly, I would probably turn and run myself. Trust me I looked at all the small 9's -most were still pretty much the SIZE and WEIGHT of my G27. Liked the super SMALL SIZE of the Bodyguard-THIN and LIGHTWEIGHT for SHORTS. Hey it comes down to what ya like and feel comfortable with- carry a 16" 44 mag if that makes you feel more comfortable - its America.
__________________
PROUD VETERAN, NRA MEMBER

Last edited by Delmonte67; 05-05-2013 at 15:50..
Delmonte67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 15:46   #56
Arvinator
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 188
After carrying a gun for 23 years I finally got my first .380 pistol. I've had little pocket pistols from .22LR, .25acp, and have had a .32 KelTec for about 10 years. Why the .380?
I carry a 9MM or larger off duty, issue .40 on duty but the pocket pistols serve as backup for off duty in light summer clothing. With a Glock 27 and spare mag off duty, the little pocket pistol rides in a pocket holster while wearing jeans, or in the rear pocket while wearing shorts. When the little Ruger LCP came out I waited for a few years to let any possible bugs get worked out. I keep the .32 in a desk drawer scattered with a few more handguns while at home and the .380 took it place. I selected the Remington 102 Grain Golden Sabers as carry ammo.
It's not as powerful (Or accurate) as one of .38 snubs, and I know that. While I know that no one caliber is a sure manstopper, I do think a few well placed .380 rounds if properly applied will motivate someone to stop his or her aggressive behavior.
Arvinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 15:59   #57
Warp
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
 
Warp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NE of Atlanta
Posts: 29,847
Quote:
Originally Posted by Delmonte67 View Post
I have no problem with 380 as a self defense round in a close quarters confrontation.
And if it isn't close quarters, well...you'll be wishing you had a "real" gun.

As the poster above says, somebody walks into the restaurant (or movie theater, or store, or whatever) and starts shooting...is a small .380 pocket gun what you want to have?

It would be better than nothing, absolutely, but as other posters hvae mentioned there are plenty of pretty small and slim 9x19 pistols if you really want something small/thin. And of course the venerable J-frame.
__________________
The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.

I HIGHLY recommend Google Chrome and Adblock to all world wide web users. (I would have left GT a long time ago without these extensions!)
Warp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 16:28   #58
Delmonte67
Glock 40 cal.
 
Delmonte67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 1,008
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warp View Post
And if it isn't close quarters, well...you'll be wishing you had a "real" gun.

As the poster above says, somebody walks into the restaurant (or movie theater, or store, or whatever) and starts shooting...is a small .380 pocket gun what you want to have?

It would be better than nothing, absolutely, but as other posters hvae mentioned there are plenty of pretty small and slim 9x19 pistols if you really want something small/thin. And of course the venerable J-frame.
That's it damn it! Caliber Corner I'm carrying my AR15 in my golf bag-JUST IN CASE!!! There may be 10 assailants or the Koreans invade us while I'm on the 17th hole!!!!! Zombies !!! I'm sooo stupid!!! What was I thinking???!!!:p
__________________
PROUD VETERAN, NRA MEMBER

Last edited by Delmonte67; 05-05-2013 at 16:36..
Delmonte67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 16:31   #59
Warp
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
 
Warp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NE of Atlanta
Posts: 29,847
I'm jealous that you can adequately and comfortably conceal a rifle all day every day, regardless of attire. Props!
__________________
The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.

I HIGHLY recommend Google Chrome and Adblock to all world wide web users. (I would have left GT a long time ago without these extensions!)
Warp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 16:39   #60
Delmonte67
Glock 40 cal.
 
Delmonte67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 1,008
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warp View Post
I'm jealous that you can adequately and comfortably conceal a rifle all day every day, regardless of attire. Props!
Caliber Corner Caliber Corner I could actually fit my Sub2000 40 Cal. in my golf bag- it folds to 16"
__________________
PROUD VETERAN, NRA MEMBER
Delmonte67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 16:43   #61
VinnieD
Senior Member
 
VinnieD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 997
Cons:
Light and slow round
Limited capacity in its most popular platforms
Pocket guns also come in 9mm and .38spl which are almost as small (but not quite)
Small frame means a very difficult to control gun even with the lighter recoil of the round. It's just very hard to hold on to such a tiny grip.

Pros:
Extremely compact package
Still better than a .32 or lower
Was good enough for James Bond
Some gun is better than no gun, so if you absolutely can't carry anything bigger it's better to have a .380 than nothing.
Easier to control recoil in larger packages makes .380 ideal for those who are recoil averse or arthritic.
Compact pocket guns make good backup guns without adding much bulk to your EDC.

All in all, I can't say that pros outweigh cons or vice versa, but rather that .380 is an extremely situational round. Yes most popular rounds are more powerful, but there are cases where you genuinely can't carry anything larger, or might be an older or smaller shooter who can't handle anything more powerful.

Certainly .380 has its purposes. It won't replace more powerful rounds, but neither can more powerful rounds take its place, in those instances where the .380 shines either for the very small guns that can fire it, or its extremely mild recoil in full size guns.
__________________
"Use more gun." -The Engineer- (Team Fortress 2)
http://gungeekfrag.tumblr.com
VinnieD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 16:52   #62
Joshhtn
Rastaman!
 
Joshhtn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 6,195


Quote:
Originally Posted by Delmonte67 View Post
That's it damn it! Caliber Corner I'm carrying my AR15 in my golf bag-JUST IN CASE!!! There may be 10 assailants or the Koreans invade us while I'm on the 17th hole!!!!! Zombies !!! I'm sooo stupid!!! What was I thinking???!!!:p


Some folks are still going to think you're under gunned... You need a .50 BMG
__________________
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
***CHECK OUT MY EBAY STORE FOR EVERYTHING YOU NEED-***
HEINRICH TREASURES

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric View Post
Dude, you are ****ing banned.
Joshhtn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 16:59   #63
dakrat
Senior Member
 
dakrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: worldwide, on time, on target
Posts: 2,768
pro: small pistol

con: Colt created it for girly men. who can easily conceal it in the purse.


Posted using Outdoor Hub Campfire
__________________
---Revolvers are the future---
dakrat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 17:01   #64
Joshhtn
Rastaman!
 
Joshhtn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 6,195


Quote:
Originally Posted by dakrat View Post
pro: small pistol

con: Colt created it for girly men. who can easily conceal it in the purse.


Posted using Outdoor Hub Campfire
Second time you've posted something to that extent in this thread... Troll much?
__________________
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
***CHECK OUT MY EBAY STORE FOR EVERYTHING YOU NEED-***
HEINRICH TREASURES

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric View Post
Dude, you are ****ing banned.
Joshhtn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 17:01   #65
dakrat
Senior Member
 
dakrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: worldwide, on time, on target
Posts: 2,768
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhotoFeller View Post
Sounds like you wouldn't mind taking a couple .380 slugs in the chest at 10'. Let us know how that works out for you.
that would hurt real bad. how would you like to be in a dual with a .45 acp?


Posted using Outdoor Hub Campfire
__________________
---Revolvers are the future---
dakrat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 17:02   #66
brownsbacker
Member
 
brownsbacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Euclid,OH
Posts: 51
Is that a sub2000 in your pocket ? or are you happy to see me !.
brownsbacker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 17:02   #67
dakrat
Senior Member
 
dakrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: worldwide, on time, on target
Posts: 2,768
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshhtn View Post
Second time you've posted something to that extent in this thread... Troll much?
nope, each post is different.

its quite entertaining to see you guys get it all in a wad.


Posted using Outdoor Hub Campfire
__________________
---Revolvers are the future---
dakrat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 17:05   #68
Delmonte67
Glock 40 cal.
 
Delmonte67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 1,008
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by VinnieD View Post
Cons:
Light and slow round
Limited capacity in its most popular platforms
Pocket guns also come in 9mm and .38spl which are almost as small (but not quite)
Small frame means a very difficult to control gun even with the lighter recoil of the round. It's just very hard to hold on to such a tiny grip.

Pros:
Extremely compact package
Still better than a .32 or lower
Was good enough for James Bond
Some gun is better than no gun, so if you absolutely can't carry anything bigger it's better to have a .380 than nothing.
Easier to control recoil in larger packages makes .380 ideal for those who are recoil averse or arthritic.
Compact pocket guns make good backup guns without adding much bulk to your EDC.

All in all, I can't say that pros outweigh cons or vice versa, but rather that .380 is an extremely situational round. Yes most popular rounds are more powerful, but there are cases where you genuinely can't carry anything larger, or might be an older or smaller shooter who can't handle anything more powerful.

Certainly .380 has its purposes. It won't replace more powerful rounds, but neither can more powerful rounds take its place, in those instances where the .380 shines either for the very small guns that can fire it, or its extremely mild recoil in full size guns.
Absolutely agree! I LOVE my 40 Cal Glock and always carry it, I shoot it way better than my 9's- believe it or not. Just wanted something (better than nothing) to conceal in my shorts, loved the BG's size and I cant tell its there. 380 better caliber than 40? Never! But it was a lot thinner/lighter than the micro nines I looked at. I bought a 32 Kel TEC off a buddy a few years ago and hated it! Sights sucked and you could hardly hit anything at 10 feet-sold it. Shot my friends Bodyguard and was highly impressed with the accuracy-awesome! So I bought one for myself. It has real sights, external safety, slide lock back after last round and don't forget the laser! Lol! (never used it) Seriously all joking with my fellow GT'ers aside- its a pretty good shooter and not one hiccup ever- I would recommend it to anyone who wants to carry a 380 during a shorts/ hot day out. But 75% of the time its my trustworthy G27- never a better pistol I have ever owned- in my honest opinion
__________________
PROUD VETERAN, NRA MEMBER

Last edited by Delmonte67; 05-05-2013 at 17:31..
Delmonte67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 17:06   #69
fastbolt
Senior Member
 
fastbolt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Within the lightning (Northern CA)
Posts: 9,415
I've drafted a post for this thread a few times, but always decided to delete it. maybe this one will get posted.

Anyway, the advantages of the diminutive .380's are few, with the primary ones being lighter weights & smaller sizes than most of the smallish 9's.

Disadvantages run longer, and mostly revolve around how much harder it is for many folks to shoot the little .380's accurately, controllably, rapidly & effectively.

The primary reason I bought a Ruger LCP after I got rid of my last .380 about 25 years ago was the smaller overall size. I could clip it into some pants pockets in which I couldn't slip one of my 5-shot J-frames.

I'd watched a lot of our folks shoot various smallish .380's for quals, including the Bodyguard .380 & LCP, but it wasn't until I finally relented to a close friend's urging to try his LCP that I decided to get one of my own. Now, I carry it a surprising amount of the time.

I figured out the trigger within the first mag load, and experienced being able to make very small, tightly clustered, clover-leaf groups from 3-7 yds right away, and that was using 3 types of modern JHP loads (Speer GDHP, Ranger T-Series & Rem GS HPJ).

The little gun was amazing when it came to practical accuracy, even with the rudimentary iron sights (which reminded me of older J-frame sights).

I could make solid hits even when shooting-while-moving against standard size threat targets ranging from 7-10+ yds, too, and get respectable hits at further distances.

Now, would I rather have one of my 5-shot J's loaded with one of the better JHP +p loads? Sure. I like the heavier bullet weights available in the .38 +P loads.

Would I rather have the LCP instead of not being armed when running around town in really light clothes and hot weather? Absolutely.

Spare me the "comforting versus comfortable" spiel. I've carried a gun with a badge for 30 years, and have been a firearms instructor for more than 20 years, so I understand the meaning behind the comment (but also think any number of folks may be taking his comment out of context, at times, too).

Caliber? Yep, the .380 is on the lighter end of things for a dedicated defensive weapon.

Sure, improved ammunition has given us some better expanding options, but there's that TANSTAAFL issue ... meaning there's always going to be at one place where you have to choose where you're willing to compromise.

I'd rather have the LCP ... (or Bodyguard, but it's just enough larger than the LCP that I refrained, and I didn't want the added bulk of the integral laser) ... than another itty bitty .22 or .25, both of which I tried out as a young cop. Not keen on the .32, either, which is even smaller and lighter in caliber & bullet weight than the .380 ACP.

I'd much rather have one of my .357 Magnum, .45, .40 S&W or 9mm pistols than one of my .38's or my .380 ... but there are increasingly more times when I simply don't want to belt on a larger handgun anymore, or pocket-carry one of my subcompact Glock 9's/.40, my CS9, SW999c, CS45, etc.

The 5-shot .38 is a "better" compromise than the .380, and as a long time revolver shooter I do well enough with them ... but the LCP is another option I've found useful.

I've listened to a couple of officer safety/tactics, etc classes in the last year where there were any number of instances involving cops saving themselves with secondary/backup weapons chambered in both .38 Spl & .380 ACP. They're still doing the job, so to speak, which is probably why they're still authorized (or even issued) as secondary & off-duty weapons ... and nowadays we have better choices for guns chambered in both calibers, as well as the ammunition used in each.

Mindset - Awareness - Skillset - Experience - Training - Practice.

A lack of any of these arguably critical considerations isn't something that's necessarily going to be offset or remedied by "caliber".

Whenever someone wants to start some "spirited debate" at the range, or feels the need to denigrate the choice of another shooter, I remind them that the "proof of the matter" is often found demonstrated out at the firing line, when someone is performing one of the more demanding & difficult courses-of-fire.

You have to be able to make sound decisions ... using good judgment, drawing upon knowledge, training & experience ... act upon a decision ... use good skills & tactics ... and get a sufficient number of accurate & solid hits on the intended threat target(s). Everything else may be a distraction.

You see enough gunshot victims, "caliber" starts to take on a bit less importance.

Just my thoughts. I absolutely respect differing opinions of other folks, too. As an instructor, I work with the person, first & foremost. Their choice of gun/caliber is their choice ... unless it's a requirement/restriction, in which case it doesn't matter what either of us thing about it, right?

I guess I'll post this one ...
__________________
Sub Club #9; .40 S&W Club #1953; S&W Club #3913
Retired LE - firearms instructor/armorer

Last edited by fastbolt; 05-05-2013 at 17:09..
fastbolt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 17:08   #70
Warp
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
 
Warp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NE of Atlanta
Posts: 29,847
Quote:
Originally Posted by dakrat View Post
nope, each post is different.

its quite entertaining to see you guys get it all in a wad.
Yeah...

Caliber Corner
__________________
The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.

I HIGHLY recommend Google Chrome and Adblock to all world wide web users. (I would have left GT a long time ago without these extensions!)
Warp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 18:08   #71
fg17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 449
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warp View Post
Question: Have you ever worn a helmet or harness while driving a car?

I hear people throw this out there a lot, and so far the people doing so haven't had any idea what they were talking about.

* Helmets reduce visibility and your ability to hear. In a race car you generally aren't concerned with hearing anything unless it's through a headset you are wearing under the helmet (spotter/crew chief/whatever). Out on the road you are going to want to be able to hear other cars, horns, sirens of emergency vehicles, people's voices, etc. And visibility matters.

* One of the reasons passenger car seat belts are normally loose, and the tensioners only lock the belt up when the car senses the potential need (higher G forces from braking, turning, an impact, whatever) is that it is important to be able to lean forward, sideways, etc, so that you can look around when necessary.

All of that might very well make you less safe by increasing your chances of being involved in an accident, and might make other people less safe by increasing the chances that you run into them or pull out in front of them.



Driving on public roads and driving on a race track are two entirely different things

That was just one example. No I don't wear a helmet in my car. I don't wear one on a bike or horse even though I should. I do wear one on a motor cycle. My original point was that I believe the 380 is ok and in my situation and in most peoples the odds of using your gun are quite small and because of that I will no longer carry a big gun on a daily basis. I have heard people in this thread say people are ill informed or just plain dumb to carry a .380 or that they are girly guns. Gimmie a break, When I was younger very few states even had concealed carry and we survived just fine. I'm glad we have it now but I'm still not afraid to leave my house without a gun.
fg17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 18:24   #72
dakrat
Senior Member
 
dakrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: worldwide, on time, on target
Posts: 2,768
people assume a perfect scenario in their favor where a robber brings a baseball bat to a gunfight. sometimes it doesnt always turn out that way and you might find yourself exchanging fires. sometimes multiple thugs with firepower. goodluck with your 6 shooter wonder. prepare for the worst. bring enough gun to the fight. good enough is never enough.


Posted using Outdoor Hub Campfire
__________________
---Revolvers are the future---

Last edited by dakrat; 05-05-2013 at 18:26..
dakrat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 18:29   #73
dakrat
Senior Member
 
dakrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: worldwide, on time, on target
Posts: 2,768
Quote:
Originally Posted by fg17 View Post
When I was younger very few states even had concealed carry and we survived just fine. I'm glad we have it now but I'm still not afraid to leave my house without a gun.
dont get the word "afraid" and "prepared" mixed up. theres a difference




Posted using Outdoor Hub Campfire
__________________
---Revolvers are the future---
dakrat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 18:32   #74
steven07
Senior Member
 
steven07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 264
Quote:
Originally Posted by fastbolt View Post
I've drafted a post for this thread a few times, but always decided to delete it. maybe this one will get posted.

Anyway, the advantages of the diminutive .380's are few, with the primary ones being lighter weights & smaller sizes than most of the smallish 9's.

Disadvantages run longer, and mostly revolve around how much harder it is for many folks to shoot the little .380's accurately, controllably, rapidly & effectively.

The primary reason I bought a Ruger LCP after I got rid of my last .380 about 25 years ago was the smaller overall size. I could clip it into some pants pockets in which I couldn't slip one of my 5-shot J-frames.

I'd watched a lot of our folks shoot various smallish .380's for quals, including the Bodyguard .380 & LCP, but it wasn't until I finally relented to a close friend's urging to try his LCP that I decided to get one of my own. Now, I carry it a surprising amount of the time.

I figured out the trigger within the first mag load, and experienced being able to make very small, tightly clustered, clover-leaf groups from 3-7 yds right away, and that was using 3 types of modern JHP loads (Speer GDHP, Ranger T-Series & Rem GS HPJ).

The little gun was amazing when it came to practical accuracy, even with the rudimentary iron sights (which reminded me of older J-frame sights).

I could make solid hits even when shooting-while-moving against standard size threat targets ranging from 7-10+ yds, too, and get respectable hits at further distances.

Now, would I rather have one of my 5-shot J's loaded with one of the better JHP +p loads? Sure. I like the heavier bullet weights available in the .38 +P loads.

Would I rather have the LCP instead of not being armed when running around town in really light clothes and hot weather? Absolutely.

Spare me the "comforting versus comfortable" spiel. I've carried a gun with a badge for 30 years, and have been a firearms instructor for more than 20 years, so I understand the meaning behind the comment (but also think any number of folks may be taking his comment out of context, at times, too).

Caliber? Yep, the .380 is on the lighter end of things for a dedicated defensive weapon.

Sure, improved ammunition has given us some better expanding options, but there's that TANSTAAFL issue ... meaning there's always going to be at one place where you have to choose where you're willing to compromise.

I'd rather have the LCP ... (or Bodyguard, but it's just enough larger than the LCP that I refrained, and I didn't want the added bulk of the integral laser) ... than another itty bitty .22 or .25, both of which I tried out as a young cop. Not keen on the .32, either, which is even smaller and lighter in caliber & bullet weight than the .380 ACP.

I'd much rather have one of my .357 Magnum, .45, .40 S&W or 9mm pistols than one of my .38's or my .380 ... but there are increasingly more times when I simply don't want to belt on a larger handgun anymore, or pocket-carry one of my subcompact Glock 9's/.40, my CS9, SW999c, CS45, etc.

The 5-shot .38 is a "better" compromise than the .380, and as a long time revolver shooter I do well enough with them ... but the LCP is another option I've found useful.

I've listened to a couple of officer safety/tactics, etc classes in the last year where there were any number of instances involving cops saving themselves with secondary/backup weapons chambered in both .38 Spl & .380 ACP. They're still doing the job, so to speak, which is probably why they're still authorized (or even issued) as secondary & off-duty weapons ... and nowadays we have better choices for guns chambered in both calibers, as well as the ammunition used in each.

Mindset - Awareness - Skillset - Experience - Training - Practice.

A lack of any of these arguably critical considerations isn't something that's necessarily going to be offset or remedied by "caliber".

Whenever someone wants to start some "spirited debate" at the range, or feels the need to denigrate the choice of another shooter, I remind them that the "proof of the matter" is often found demonstrated out at the firing line, when someone is performing one of the more demanding & difficult courses-of-fire.

You have to be able to make sound decisions ... using good judgment, drawing upon knowledge, training & experience ... act upon a decision ... use good skills & tactics ... and get a sufficient number of accurate & solid hits on the intended threat target(s). Everything else may be a distraction.

You see enough gunshot victims, "caliber" starts to take on a bit less importance.

Just my thoughts. I absolutely respect differing opinions of other folks, too. As an instructor, I work with the person, first & foremost. Their choice of gun/caliber is their choice ... unless it's a requirement/restriction, in which case it doesn't matter what either of us thing about it, right?

I guess I'll post this one ...
Excellent post and I'm glad you finally decided to chime in. When I bought my LCP the only thing on my mind was its size and how well it functioned. At that time it was still cold outside and I carried it in my pocket or left it in the center console but still always had my PM40 on me as well. Now that it is starting to warm up, and since I let go of my KAHR in a trade on a gen4 19 the LCP will be my primary gun in summer clothes. Once it cools back down the 19 will go back on my belt but till then I feel like my LCP loaded with critical duty is sufficient enough. Again thank you for input.
steven07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 18:32   #75
Joshhtn
Rastaman!
 
Joshhtn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 6,195


Quote:
Originally Posted by dakrat View Post
people assume a perfect scenario in their favor where a robber brings a baseball bat to a gunfight. sometimes it doesnt always turn out that way and you might find yourself exchanging fires. sometimes multiple thugs with firepower. goodluck with your 6 shooter wonder. prepare for the worst. bring enough gun to the fight. good enough is never enough.


Posted using Outdoor Hub Campfire
Says the guy with "Revolvers are the future" in his signature line
__________________
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
***CHECK OUT MY EBAY STORE FOR EVERYTHING YOU NEED-***
HEINRICH TREASURES

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric View Post
Dude, you are ****ing banned.

Last edited by Joshhtn; 05-05-2013 at 18:33..
Joshhtn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:55.



Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 732
176 Members
556 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,244
Nov 11, 2013 at 11:42