Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-27-2013, 14:37   #1
HoneyBear
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 27
Siderlock

Does anyone have any experience or opinions about this lock?
HoneyBear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2013, 16:03   #2
MJB
Senior Member
 
MJB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 599
My opinion is that it is a totally useless item. If you feel the need for a manual external safety then get a gun that has one. There's lots out there to choose from.

If you want to stick with Glock then just don't pull the trigger and it won't fire.
MJB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2013, 19:12   #3
kindaclever1
Senior Member
 
kindaclever1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 233
Quote:
Originally Posted by HoneyBear View Post
Does anyone have any experience or opinions about this lock?
I have had them installed on all my Glocks for the past couple years. Never any issues. I like how fast I can disengaged the safety as its located on the trigger. They all have a nice positive lock and unlock. Plus if you decide down the road that you no longer want to have a manual safety you can easily remove it. Oh and be prepared for a little flaming. I don't know what it is about firearms. But people get really opinionated on what type of firearm you should carry. I say find out what works best for you. Its your Glock.
good luck!

Last edited by kindaclever1; 03-27-2013 at 19:13..
kindaclever1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2013, 16:36   #4
Paul53
Geezer Boomer
 
Paul53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Corner of walk & Don't Walk
Posts: 4,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJB View Post
My opinion is that it is a totally useless item. If you feel the need for a manual external safety then get a gun that has one. There's lots out there to choose from.

If you want to stick with Glock then just don't pull the trigger and it won't fire.
Did you have trouble with a Siderlock? I assume your strong opinion is from personal use. Granted it's not for everyone, but for some questions each has to find his own answer.

I used one for a year and it was absolutely super. May put it back on my 19. Just depends on where I go and my comfort level. Wouldn't hesitate to recommend it to anyone who felt they needed the extra assurance.
__________________
Every living human has DNA that traces back to Africa. All the wars are about differences we've invented or chosen.

Last edited by Paul53; 03-28-2013 at 16:38..
Paul53 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2013, 18:46   #5
jmb79
Senior Member
 
jmb79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 1,647
If the OP runs a search on the part's term, s/he will find more threads on the subject than s/he can read in an evening.

My personal opinion is that the siderlock is a horrible addition to any Glock. The primary reason for my belief is that use of the siderlock requires one to violate one of the four fundemental tenants of gun safety, to wit: thou shall keep thy finger off the trigger until thy sights are on target and thou are ready to shoot.
jmb79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2013, 19:41   #6
Paul53
Geezer Boomer
 
Paul53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Corner of walk & Don't Walk
Posts: 4,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmb79 View Post
The primary reason for my belief is that use of the siderlock requires one to violate one of the four fundemental tenants of gun safety, to wit: thou shall keep thy finger off the trigger until thy sights are on target and thou are ready to shoot.
I found it easy to release the Siderlock with the mid section of my finger as I placed my trigger finger. However, not everybody has XXXL hands like mine, so I concede you have a very good point.
__________________
Every living human has DNA that traces back to Africa. All the wars are about differences we've invented or chosen.
Paul53 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2013, 19:59   #7
rotjovi
Senior Member
 
rotjovi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 248
I looked at LWD's page on the safety. It says it "Protects from accidental discharge."

Most here on GT know there is no such thing. Negligent discharge maybe, but not accidental...


Posted using Outdoor Hub Campfire
rotjovi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2013, 04:51   #8
Bill Lumberg
BTF Inventor
 
Bill Lumberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,306
Few things are more comical than a safety that requires placing a finger in the trigger guard to activate and deactivate.
__________________
Did someone talk to you about your TPS reports?
Bill Lumberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2013, 18:52   #9
PEC-Memphis
Scottish Member
 
PEC-Memphis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Doh ?
Posts: 4,017
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg View Post
Few things are more comical than a safety that requires placing a finger in the trigger guard to activate and deactivate.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmb79 View Post
If the OP runs a search on the part's term, s/he will find more threads on the subject than s/he can read in an evening.

My personal opinion is that the siderlock is a horrible addition to any Glock. The primary reason for my belief is that use of the siderlock requires one to violate one of the four fundemental tenants of gun safety, to wit: thou shall keep thy finger off the trigger until thy sights are on target and thou are ready to shoot.
Bingo.
__________________
To all members of our Armed Forces - past, present and future - thank you for your service to our country.

Last edited by PEC-Memphis; 03-29-2013 at 18:58..
PEC-Memphis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2013, 18:57   #10
PEC-Memphis
Scottish Member
 
PEC-Memphis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Doh ?
Posts: 4,017
Quote:
Originally Posted by rotjovi View Post
Most here on GT know there is no such thing. Negligent discharge maybe, but not accidental...[/URL]
And those folks would be incorrect.

Firearms are mechanical devices that have in the past, and will in the future, not function as designed/intended. NDs are the most common, but ADs do occur.
__________________
To all members of our Armed Forces - past, present and future - thank you for your service to our country.
PEC-Memphis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2013, 19:20   #11
Paul53
Geezer Boomer
 
Paul53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Corner of walk & Don't Walk
Posts: 4,232
Honeybear, there you have it. Those who've used the Siderlock like it. The "purists" who might change many things on their Glocks say it's blasphemous to add the trigger safety.
The posts are already becoming argumentative and off topic. Soon the trolls will jump in arguing semantics and why it's all Obama's fault.
__________________
Every living human has DNA that traces back to Africa. All the wars are about differences we've invented or chosen.
Paul53 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2013, 19:23   #12
markerbeacon
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Madison, AL
Posts: 407
MJB, Anger issues friend.
markerbeacon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2013, 09:25   #13
MJB
Senior Member
 
MJB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 599
Quote:
Originally Posted by markerbeacon View Post
MJB, Anger issues friend.
Naw, no anger here. The OP asked for opinion and I just gave mine.

To elaborate, I simply don't like devices that need to be removed/switched off before the gun is ready to shoot. I've experienced twice (though it was a shotgun) where I intended to shoot but had the manual safety on. Once pheasant hunting and once shooting sporting clays. This is a low stress scenario. In a life and death self defense scenario (high stress) this could cost you your life not simply a missed bird or clay.

As stated this is my opinion and YMMV.
MJB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2013, 09:31   #14
Clusterfrack
Senior Member
 
Clusterfrack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 2,408
Interesting idea. I wouldn't consider it because it is so nonstandard. Literally no gun currently in production works that way, so you're learning skills that have no other application. What's more, I don't see the need for it. Put your Glock in a good holster and it's safer than a Mexican carry Glock with one of these trigger button thingies.
__________________
"I have one simple request... and that is to have sharks with fricking laser beams attached to their heads!"--Dr. Evil
Clusterfrack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2013, 09:45   #15
ZO6Vettever
Senior Member
 
ZO6Vettever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 370
Quote:
Originally Posted by rotjovi View Post
I looked at LWD's page on the safety. It says it "Protects from accidental discharge."

Most here on GT know there is no such thing. Negligent discharge maybe, but not accidental...


Posted using Outdoor Hub Campfire
It keeps the trigger from being pulled if it gets snagged on a shirt or holster. Why do they call it "Glock leg"? I would think that's accidental.
__________________
Sent from my rotary phone.

Remember, we're all on the same side!

Army Vet Dec 1965 - Dec 1971
ZO6Vettever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2013, 09:48   #16
Clusterfrack
Senior Member
 
Clusterfrack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 2,408
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZO6Vettever View Post
It keeps the trigger from being pulled if it gets snagged on a shirt or holster. Why do they call it "Glock leg"? I would think that's accidental.
It's negligent to not check your holster for obstructions before re-holstering.
__________________
"I have one simple request... and that is to have sharks with fricking laser beams attached to their heads!"--Dr. Evil
Clusterfrack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2013, 15:14   #17
rdunk
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 66
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg View Post
Few things are more comical than a safety that requires placing a finger in the trigger guard to activate and deactivate.
Which is exactly how you deactivate the OEM Glock safety. Just stick that old finger in there on the trigger, and deactivate the safety while pulling the trigger!! It goes Bang!!! Intended or not!

That is why so many who own Glocks, like me, still would rather have a Glock with a manual safety. In my opinion, a Glock striker fired pistol has no safety against most of the accidental firing possible causes, except against maybe being dropped. However, for me, if it is a hammer fired pistol, such as is my Sig 229, then no manual safety needed for my comfort.

But, to each their own opinions!
rdunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2013, 20:03   #18
Paul53
Geezer Boomer
 
Paul53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Corner of walk & Don't Walk
Posts: 4,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by rdunk View Post
Which is exactly how you deactivate the OEM Glock safety. Just stick that old finger in there on the trigger, and deactivate the safety while pulling the trigger!! It goes Bang!!! Intended or not!

That is why so many who own Glocks, like me, still would rather have a Glock with a manual safety. In my opinion, a Glock striker fired pistol has no safety against most of the accidental firing possible causes, except against maybe being dropped. However, for me, if it is a hammer fired pistol, such as is my Sig 229, then no manual safety needed for my comfort.

But, to each their own opinions!
Dang, everytime I come up with a good answer somebody has beat me to it! Need to get a faster brain.

But as stated above, Glock has 3 safeties, but you have to pull the trigger to release them. There's also a more conventional external safety that can be added.

But a question. People talk about changing barrels, sights, springs, 25 cent trigger job, trigger connectors, and so on forever. I'd guess very few Glocks are completely stock. Why does only the idea of adding a safety bring up such strong feelings?
__________________
Every living human has DNA that traces back to Africa. All the wars are about differences we've invented or chosen.
Paul53 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2013, 20:09   #19
Clusterfrack
Senior Member
 
Clusterfrack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 2,408
I don't have strong feelings about other people cutting into their Glocks and adding a thumb safety. I do feel strongly that it will never happen to any of mine.
__________________
"I have one simple request... and that is to have sharks with fricking laser beams attached to their heads!"--Dr. Evil
Clusterfrack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2013, 20:28   #20
samurairabbi
Dungeon Schmuck
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 6,922
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul53 View Post
Why does only the idea of adding a safety bring up such strong feelings?
Because the anti-firearm crowd has been dumping on the safety-less Glock for so long we believe that adding an external applied safety to a Glock somehow validates what they have been saying.
__________________
Samurai Rabbi
samurairabbi is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:30.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 664
208 Members
456 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31