Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-18-2013, 11:47   #1
ArmoryDoc
Senior Member
 
ArmoryDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 5,985
Requesting Sig P226 vs. P229 size comparison

Does anyone own both and can you do an overlay showing the size comparison of both guns ? I have the 226R but am jonesing for a 229. If there isn't that much realized difference I may not be able to justify the funds for it.

I know what the specs say but sometimes it's easier for an actual visual comparison. Thanks !
ArmoryDoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2013, 18:09   #2
mr00jimbo
Senior Member
 
mr00jimbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 4,317
I only have P226s myself.
But I'll try to find some comparison pictures from the internet
General Firearms Forum
General Firearms Forum
__________________
"Learning to shoot with a Glock is like learning to drive with a car with a smashed windshield and two flat tires."
-Yo
mr00jimbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2013, 23:07   #3
ArmoryDoc
Senior Member
 
ArmoryDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 5,985
Wow. Not a lot of difference, is there ? Thanks jimbo, for the legwork. I think that answered my question.
ArmoryDoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2013, 23:48   #4
mr00jimbo
Senior Member
 
mr00jimbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 4,317
No problem! Sorry I couldn't be of more help.
__________________
"Learning to shoot with a Glock is like learning to drive with a car with a smashed windshield and two flat tires."
-Yo
mr00jimbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2013, 01:03   #5
sns3guppy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,042
For what it's worth, I find the P229 a lot more balanced, comfortable, and for the small difference, just enough compact to be comfortable concealed. It's a full size duty weapon, too.

If you're going to be shooting .40, the P229 is one of the best platforms on the market.
sns3guppy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2013, 02:01   #6
Andy W
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 3,983
I think the P226 is actually slightly thinner than the supposedly "compact" P229. Holding both my 226 and various 229s, the grip does feel fatter on the 229 from what I remember. If the 229 feels better to you, get it. If you are just buying it because you feel it's more compact, you are probably wasting your money. I'd get a 239 if I wanted a concealable Sig classic pistol. That or the new 224 or whatever its called.
Andy W is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2013, 02:41   #7
RJ's Guns
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 791
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy W View Post
I think the P226 is actually slightly thinner than the supposedly "compact" P229. Holding both my 226 and various 229s, the grip does feel fatter on the 229 from what I remember. If the 229 feels better to you, get it. If you are just buying it because you feel it's more compact, you are probably wasting your money. I'd get a 239 if I wanted a concealable Sig classic pistol. That or the new 224 or whatever its called.
According to the Sig Sauer web site, both the P229 and P226 have an "overall width of 1.5 inches."

How the grips feel may depend on which model of P226 and P229 one is comparing. For instance, I prefer the "custom aluminum grips" on the Elite Dark models better than "ergonomic one piece reduced reach grips used (on Sig's) E2 pistols"

RJ

Last edited by RJ's Guns; 02-19-2013 at 02:41..
RJ's Guns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2013, 02:44   #8
NEOH212
Diesel Girl
 
NEOH212's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North East Ohio
Posts: 9,094
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArmoryDoc View Post
Wow. Not a lot of difference, is there ? Thanks jimbo, for the legwork. I think that answered my question.
The size difference doesn't seem that much until you try to conceal it. Although the 226 can be carried concealed rather well, the slightly smaller size of the 229 makes it easier to conceal and I find if more comfortable.
__________________
When you finish speaking, don't forget to wipe.
NEOH212 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2013, 07:09   #9
GreenDrake
Rip Lips
 
GreenDrake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: North Idaho
Posts: 7,785
I don't know how the grip feels fatter on a 229, I went to Cabela's to check out guns when I was in the market last month. After holding all the Sig line, the P229 was a complete natural fit and much smaller compared to the 226. It's a perfect balance. After simply handling it for a little bit I bought it, once I checked LGS pricing it was a no brainer. Granted, I think the 226 had Hogues on it, which definitely fatten it up quite a bit.

Went back last week and their prices came up. Luckily I got my model, the P229R E2 for $769. Not sure of price variations between the 9mm and .40 but the only one they had on the shelf last week was a .40 and it was almost a grand.

I could not be happier with my purchase. The E2 grips are very nicely contoured and textured and accuracy is dead on beautiful for my usage so far. It's the perfect carry gun for me, couldn't recommend it higher.

General Firearms Forum
__________________
"Can you FLY, Bobby?"
P229 EDC

Last edited by GreenDrake; 02-19-2013 at 07:11..
GreenDrake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2013, 07:52   #10
SigFTW
Senior Member
 
SigFTW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: TX
Posts: 2,217
I have both and the P229 40 is smaller, easier to carry and very well balanced as other stated.

My P226 is a range gun and the P229 is a carry.
__________________
Spent brass to me is like the ring to Gollum "We wants it, we needs it. Must have the precious"
SigFTW is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:37.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 725
192 Members
533 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31