GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-30-2013, 20:26   #1
Mountain10mm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 424
Senate hearing and cigarettes

Did anyone else hear the overly repeated sound bite from the Senate hearing today on gun control where the opposition said (I'm paraphrasing) that "talking about gun control and not including guns would be like talking about lung cancer and not including cigarettes."

Great analogy except that cigarettes are a not right specifically listed in the Constitution, do not require a background check, are not banned, or are not in the process of being banned. No one has tried to shorten (in comparison to magazine capacity) a cigarette, restrict where a business can sell cigarettes, or prohibit possession. All they have done is prohibit where you can smoke a cigarette...and I'm willing to bet all the geographic areas combined about where you can legally discharge a firearm is a mere fraction of where cigarette smoking is allowed.
Mountain10mm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2013, 20:30   #2
VA27
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: usa
Posts: 1,519
Not to mention the fact that not all lung cancer is caused by cigarettes.
__________________
The United States already has a national gun policy. It's called the Second Amendment.

The NRA is my union.
VA27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2013, 21:01   #3
NorthCarolinaLiberty
MentalDefective
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Tax Funded Mental Institution
Posts: 5,144
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mountain10mm View Post

...cigarettes ...do not require a background check, are not banned, or are not in the process of being banned. No one has tried to shorten (in comparison to magazine capacity) a cigarette, restrict where a business can sell cigarettes, or prohibit possession.

The analogy is perfectly logical to big government types. If you have thought of it, someone is trying to do it.



With the New World Order, all things are possible:

1. Proposal for prescription only cigarettes in Oregon:
http://www.kptv.com/story/20662618/b...ion-only-drugs




2. TV cigarette ads banned in the early 1970s.





3. Simon Chapman of Tobacco Control suggests licensing for cigarette consumers. Aspects of the license:
  • Up to $200 government license fee
  • Maximum number of cigarettes purchased
  • Government database of smokers and their Smart Cards
  • Tourists apply for license before traveling
  • Applicants pass a knowledge test for smoking
The Australian Chapman notes that the WorldHealth Organization's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control has been ratifiedby 176 nations.

http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/...342-Framework1

NorthCarolinaLiberty is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:16.



Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 759
207 Members
552 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,244
Nov 11, 2013 at 11:42